La diversidad en los equipos de trabajoestudio de sus efectos y factores moderadores

  1. de Luis Carnicer, María Pilar
  2. Martínez Sánchez, Ángel
  3. Pérez Pérez, Manuela
Icade: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho

ISSN: 1889-7045

Year of publication: 2004

Issue: 62

Pages: 133-154

Type: Article

More publications in: Icade: Revista de la Facultad de Derecho

Bibliographic References

  • AMABILE, T; CONTI, R.; COON, H; LAZENBY, J y HERRON, M. (1996), “Assessing the work environment for creativity”, Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1154-1184.
  • AMASON, A. y SCHWEIGER, D. (1994), “Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making and organizational performance”, International Journal of Conflict Management, 5: 239-253.
  • ARROW, H. y MCGRATH, J. (1993), “Membership matters: How member change and continuity affect small group structure, process and performance”, Small Group Research, 24: 334-361.
  • BILLIG, M. y TAJFEL, H. (1973), “Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior”, European Journal of Social Psychology, 3: 27-52.
  • BLAU, P. (1977), Inequality and Heterogeneity, Nueva York: Free Press.
  • BURSIC, K. (1992), “Strategies and benefits of the successful use of teams in manufacturing organizations”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39: 277-289.
  • BYRNE, D. (1971), The Attraction Paradigm, Nueva York: Academic Press.
  • CHATMAN, J.; POLZER, J.; BARSADE, S. y NEALE, M. (1998), “Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 749-780.
  • COHEN, S. y BAILEY, D. (1997), “What makes team work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite”, Journal of Management, 23: 239-290.
  • COLVIN, G. (1999), “The 50 best companies for Asians, Blacks, and Hispanics: Companies that pursue diversity outperform the S&P 500. Coincidence?”, Fortune, 53-58.
  • COX, T. (1991), “The multicultural organization”, Academy of Management Executive, 5: 34-47
  • ELY, R. y THOMAS, D. (2001), “Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 229-273.
  • FESTINGER, L. (1950), “Informal social communication”, Psychological Review, 57: 271-282.
  • GUZZO, R. y DICKSON, M. (1996), “Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness”, Annual Review of Psychology, 47: 307-338.
  • HARRISON, D.; PRICE, K. y BELL, M. (1998), “Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion”, Academy of Management Journal, 41: 96-107.
  • IBARRA, H. (1992), “Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 422-447.
  • JACKSON, S. (1992), “Team composition in organizations”, en S. Worchel, W. Wood y J. Simpson (eds.), Group Process and Productivity: 1-12, Londres: Sage.
  • JACKSON, S.; MAY, K. y WHITNEY, K. (1995), “Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams”, en R.Guzzo y E. Salas (eds.), Team Decision-Making Effectiveness in Organizations, 204-261, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • JEHN, K.; CHADWICK, C. y THATCHER, S. (1997), “To agree or not to agree. Diversity, conflict, and group outcomes”, International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 287-306.
  • JEHN, K.; NORTHCRAFT, G. y NEALE, M. (1999), “Why some differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741-763.
  • KORABIK, K. (1999), “Sex and gender in the new millennium”, en G. Powell (editor), Gender and Work, 3-16. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • KRAMER, M. (1991), “Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes”, en L. Cummings y B. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 13: 191-227. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • KRAMER, R.; BREWER, N. y HANNA, B. (1996), “Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision”, en R. Kramer y T. Tyler (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, 257-389, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • LEEDE, J. y RIEMSDIJK, M. (2001), “External labour flexibility and teamwork in manufacturing: are the two compatible?”, Proceedings of the 8th EUROMA Conference, Bath (Reino Unido): 1235-1248.
  • MARKÓCZY, L. (1997), “Measuring beliefs: accept no substitutes”, Academy of Management Journal, 40:1228-1242.
  • MILLIKEN, F. y MARTINS, L. (1996), “Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups”, Academy of Management Review, 21: 402-433.
  • NEMETH, C. (1986), “Differential contributions of majority and minority influence”, Psychological Review, 93: 23-32.
  • NONAKA, I. y TAKEUCHI, H. (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company, Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • O REILLY, C.; CALDWELL, D. y BARNETT, W. (1989), “Work group demography, social integration, and turnover”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 21-37.
  • OLSON, E.; WALKER, O. y RUEKERT, R. (1995), “Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness”, Journal of Marketing, 59: 48-62.
  • PELLED, L. (1996), “Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory”, Organization Science, 7: 615-631.
  • PELLED, L. y ADLER, P. (1994), “Antecedents of intergroup conflict in multifunctional product development teams: a conceptual model”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41: 21-28.
  • PELLED, L.; EISENHARDT, K. y XIN, K. (1999), “Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 1-28.
  • POLZER, J.; MILTON, L. y SWANN, W. (2002), “Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 296-324.
  • SCHMIDT, J.; MONTOYA-WEISS, M. y MASSEY, A. (2001), “New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams”, Decision Sciences, 32: 575-600.
  • SHAH, P. y JEHN, K. (1993), “Do friends perform better than acquaintances? The interaction of friendship, conflict, and task”, Group Decision and Negotiation, 2: 149-166.
  • SIMONS, T.; PELLED, L. y SMITH, K. (1999), “Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams”, Academy of Management Journal, 42: 662-674.
  • SIMONS, T. y PETERSON, R. (1999), “Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 102-111.
  • SIMSARIAN, S. y DONAHUE, L. (2001), “Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis”, Journal of Management, 27: 141-162.
  • SMITH, K.; SMITH, K.; OLIAN, J.; SIMS, H.; O BANNON, D. y SCULLE, J. (1994), “Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 412-438.
  • SPEITZER, G. (1995), “Psychological empowerment in the workforce: Dimensions, measurement, and validation”, Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1442-1465.
  • STASSER, G. y STEWART, D. (1992), “Discovery of hidden profiles by decision- making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgement”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63: 426-434.
  • TANNEN, D. (1990), You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation, Nueva York: Ballantine Books.
  • TSUI, A. y O REILLY, C. (1989), “Beyond simply demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads”, Academy of Management Journal, 32: 402-423.
  • TSUI, A.; EGAN, T. y O REILLY, C. (1992), “Being different: Relational demography and organizational commitment”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 549-579.
  • TURBAN, D. y JONES, A. (1988), “Supervisor-subordinate similarity: types, effects, mechanisms”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 228-234.
  • TURNER, J; HOGG, M.; OAKES, P.; REICHER, S. y WETHERELL, M. (1987), Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory, Nueva York: Blackwell.
  • WATSON, W.; KUMAR, E. y MICHAELSEN, L. (1993), “Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups”, Academy of Management Journal, 36: 590-602.
  • WESTPHAL, J. y MILTON, L. (2000), “How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 366-398.
  • WIERSEMAN, M. y BIRD, A. (1993), “Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover”, Academy of Management Journal, 36: 996-1025.
  • WILLIAMS, K. y O REILLY, C. (1998), “Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research”, en B. Staw y L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 20: 77-140. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.