A longitudinal study of L2 historical writingLexical richness and writing proficiency in Content and Language Integrated Learning

  1. Granados, Adrián 1
  2. López-Jiménez, María Dolores 1
  3. Lorenzo, Francisco 1
  1. 1 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

Revue:
Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos ( AELFE )

ISSN: 1139-7241 2340-2784

Année de publication: 2022

Número: 43

Pages: 129-154

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17398/2340-2784.43.129 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos ( AELFE )

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Résumé

Al contrario que la mayor parte de la investigación realizada hasta ahora sobre la competencia escrita en contextos formales –que es transversal y está desvinculada del contenido disciplinar–, el propósito de este estudio es ofrecer una descripción longitudinal de la riqueza léxica en el lenguaje histórico en L2 de estudiantes de enseñanza secundaria bilingüe AICLE a lo largo de tres años. La herramienta computacional Coh-Metrix 3.0 ha sido utilizada para analizar la evolución de la diversidad, la densidad y la sofisticación léxicas de un corpus de aprendices compuesto por 75 narraciones históricas producidas por los mismo 15 estudiantes como parte de sus clases de historia en inglés L2. Los resultados muestran un incremento en la cantidad de unidades léxicas empleadas por los estudiantes, así como en la abstracción y asociabilidad de los términos. Esto indica que los estudiantes mejoraron su riqueza léxica, a la vez que desarrollaron su competencia escrita y su literacidad histórica.

Références bibliographiques

  • Achugar, M. & B. Carpenter (2014). "Tracking movement toward academic language in multilingual classrooms”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.002
  • Achugar, M. & M. J. Schleppegrell (2005). “Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks”. Linguistics and Education 16(3): 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.02.003
  • Asención-Delaney, Y. & Y. Collentine (2011). “A multidimensional analysis of a written L2 Spanish corpus”. Applied Linguistics 32: 299-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq053
  • Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & L. Gulikers (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
  • Barber, H. A., Otten, L. J., Kousta, S. T., & G. Vigliocco (2013). “Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task”. Brain & Language 125: 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.005
  • Biber, D. (1992). “The Multi-Dimensional Approach to Linguistic Analyses of Genre Variation: An Overview of Methodology and Findings”. Computers and the Humanities 26(5/6): 331-345.
  • Britton, J., Martin, N., & H. Rosen (1966). Multiple Marking of Compositions. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
  • Christie, F. & K. Maton (2011). Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives. London: Continuum.
  • Christie, F. (2012). Language education: A functional perspective. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Coffin, C. (2006). “Reconstructing personal time as collective time: Learning the dis-course of history” in R. Whittaker, M. O’Donnell, M. & A. McCabe (eds.), Language and literacy: Functional approaches, 15-45. London: Continuum.
  • Coffin, C. (2009). Historical discourse. London: Continuum.
  • Crossley, S. A., & D. S. McNamara (2011). “Understanding expert ratings of essay quality: Coh-Metrix analyses of first and second language writing”. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning 21(2-3): 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2011.040197
  • Crossley, S. A., & D. S. McNamara. (2012). “Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication”. Journal of Research in Reading 35(2): 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01449.x
  • Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., Allen, L. K., Gou, L., & D. S. McNamara (2014). “Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in automated writing evaluation”. Journal of Writing Assessment, 7 (1).
  • Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R. D., McNamara, D. S., & A. Graesser. (2011) “Predicting human scores of essay quality using computational indices of linguistic and textual features” in G. Biswas, S. Bull, J. Kay, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 438-440. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_62
  • Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D. S., & S. Jarvis (2010). “Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices”. Language Testing 28(4): 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210378031
  • Crossley, S. A., Weston, J., McLain Sullivan, S. T., & D. S. McNamara (2011). The development of writing proficiency as a function of grade level: A linguistic analysis. Written Communication 28(3): 282-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311410188
  • Crossley, S.A. (2020). “Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview”. Journal of Writing Research 11(3): 415-443. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01
  • Cummins, J. (1979). “Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters”. Working Papers on Bilingualism 19: 121-129.
  • Deane, M., & P. O’Neill (2011). Writing in the Disciplines. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dóczi, B. & J. Kormos (2016). Longitudinal Developments in Vocabulary Knowledge and Lexical Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Douglas, R. D. (2013). “The lexical breadth of undergraduate novice level writing competency”. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 16(1): 152-170.
  • Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2008). “From novice to disciplinary expert: disciplinary identity and genre mastery’”. English for Specific Purposes 27(2): 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.006
  • Ellis, N. (2002). “Frequency Effects in Language Processing: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 143-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024
  • Ellis, N. C. (2012). “Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190512000025
  • Engber, C. A. (1995). “The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions”. Journal of Second Language Writing 4(2): 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90004-7
  • Flowerdew, J. (2014). “Corpus-based approach to language description for specialized academic writing.’” Language Teaching 50: 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000378
  • Gardner, S., Nesi, H. & D. Biber (2019) “Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing”. Applied Linguistics 40(4): 646–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005
  • Grabe, W. (2002). “Narrative and expository macro-genres” in A. N. Johns (ed), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Grant, L. &A. Ginther (2000). Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing 9: 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00019-9
  • Grobe, C. (1981). “Syntactic maturity, mechanics, and vocabulary as predictors of quality ratings”. Research in the Teaching of English 15(1): 75–85.
  • Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & D. S. McNamara (2013). “Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study”. Assessing Writing 18(3): 218-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Harmon, Z. & V. Kapatsinski (2017). “Putting old tools to novel uses: The role of form accessibility in semantic extension”. Cognitive Psychology 98: 22-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.08.002
  • Harwood, N. & G. Hadley (2004). “Demystifying institutional practices: critical pragmatism and the teaching of academic writing”. English for Specific Purposes 23(4): 355-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.08.001
  • Haswell, R. (2000). “Documenting improvement in college writing: A longitudinal approach”. Written Communication 17(3): 307–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088300017003001
  • Hornberger, N. (2004). “The Continua of Biliteracy and the Bilingual Educator: Educational Linguistics in Practice”. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 7(2): 155-171. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597565-004
  • Jarvis, S. (2002).” Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity”. Language Testing 19(1): 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt220oa
  • Jarvis, S. (2013). “Capturing the diversity in lexical diversity”. Language Learning 63(Supplement 1): 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00739.x
  • Jarvis, S. (2017). “Grounding lexical diversity in human judgments”. Language Testing 34(4): 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217710632
  • Jarvis, S., Grant, L., Bikowski, D., & D. Ferris (2003). Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing 12(4): 377–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.09.001
  • Kuiken, F., & I. Vedder (2014). “Rating written performance: What do raters do and why?” Language Testing 31(3): 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214526174
  • Kyle, K., & S. A. Crossley (2016). “The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing”. Journal of Second Language Writing 34(4): 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003
  • Lahuerta Martínez, A. C. (2015). “The Written Competence of Spanish Secondary Education Students in Bilingual and Non-­Bilingual Programs”. Porta Linguarum 24: 74-61. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.53796
  • Laufer, B., & P. Nation (1995). “Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production”. Applied Linguistics 16: 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
  • Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & P. Durán (2004). Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-51180-4
  • McCarthy, P. M. & S. Jarvis (2010). “MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment”. Behavior Research Methods 42(2): 381-392. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
  • McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & P. M. McCarthy. (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication 27(1): 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547
  • McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & R. Roscoe (2013). “Natural Language Processing in an Intelligent Writing Strategy Tutoring System”. Behavior Research Methods 45(2): 499-515. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1
  • McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., Cai, Z. & A. Graesser (2014). Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mohan, B., Leung, C. & C. Davison (2001). English as a Second Language in the Mainstream. London: Pearson Education.
  • Nikula, T. (2017). “Emerging themes, future research directions” in A. Llinares & T. Morton (eds.), Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL, 307-313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Nokes, J. D. (2013). Building students’ historical literacies: Learning to read and reason with historical texts and evidence. New York: Routledge.
  • Nold, E. W., & S. W. Freedman (1977). An analysis of readers’ responses to essays. Research in the Teaching of English 11(2): 164–174.
  • Ortega, L. & H. Byrnes (eds.). (2008). The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. New York: Routledge.
  • Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2018). “Examining second language vocabulary growth. Replications of Schmitt (1998) and Webb & Chang (2012)”. Language Teaching 52(4): 512-523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481800037X
  • Prediger, S. & K. Hein (2017). “Learning to meet language demands in multi-step mathematical argumentations: Design research on a subject-specific genre”. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 5(2): 309-337. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-0010
  • Reppen, R. (1994). Variation in elementary student language: A multi-dimensional perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
  • Rose, D. (2008). “Writing as linguistic mastery: The development of genre-based literacy pedagogy” in R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley, & M. Nystrand (eds.), Handbook of Writing Development, 151–166. London: Sage.
  • Schleppegrel, M.J. & M. C. Colombi. (2002). Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages. Mawhaw: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Shanahan, T. & C. Shanahan (2008). “Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents. Rethinking content-area literacy”. Harvard Educational Review 78: 40-59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
  • Spöttl, C. & M. Mccarthy (2004). “Comparing the knowledge of formulaic sequences across L1, L2, L3 and L4” in N. Schmitt (ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use, 191-225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Tracy-Ventura, N., Mitchell, R. & K. McManus (2016). “The LANGSNAP longitudinal learner corpus. Design and use” in M. Alonso-Ramos (ed.), Spanish Learner Corpus Research. Current trends and future perspectives, 117-142. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
  • Vanhove, J., Bonvin, A., Lambelet, A., & R. Berthele (2019) Predicting perceptions of the lexical richness of short French, German, and Portuguese texts using text-based indices. Journal of Writing Research 10(3): 499-525. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.10.03.04
  • White, H. (2010). In R. Doran (Ed.), The fiction of narrative: Essays on history, literature, and theory, 1957-2007. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Wolfe-Quintero, K, Inagaki, S. & K. Hae-Youn (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Young, A., & T. Fulwiler (1986). Writing Across the Disciplines: Research into Practice. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.