Public sector bureaucracies and economic growth

  1. Jorge Onrubia 2
  2. Javier J. Pérez 1
  3. A. Jesús Sánchez-Fuentes 2
  1. 1 Banco de España
    info

    Banco de España

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f26yq04

  2. 2 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

Revista:
Revista de economía mundial

ISSN: 1576-0162

Año de publicación: 2019

Número: 51

Páginas: 121-138

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.33776/REM.V0I51.3906 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openArias Montano editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de economía mundial

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Las burocracias del sector público son actores clave en las economías avanzadas, como en el caso de los países de la Unión Europea, para el buen funcionamiento de los papeles asignados a los gobiernos (proporcionar servicios y prestaciones del Estado de Bienestar, infraestructuras públicas y diseño del marco jurídico y económico institucional). Desde esta perspectiva, el buen funcionamiento de la burocracia pública es crucial para el crecimiento potencial. Por lo tanto, las diferencias entre países en la calidad de las burocracias pueden explicar las diferencias en el crecimiento económico. En consecuencia, la existencia de “burocracias con intereses propios” puede llevar a políticas fiscales inadecuadas, a la captura regulatoria o al mal funcionamiento del mercado laboral, dañando los incentivos y generando importantes costes de eficiencia. Dos son los objetivos de este artículo. En primer lugar, revisamos la literatura existente, centrándonos en los principales canales de la relación entre burocracia y crecimiento. Y en segundo, ofrecemos un ejercicio empírico que ilustra los vínculos entre la calidad burocrática/institucional y el crecimiento económico.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

J. Onrubia acknowledges the financial support of Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (project ECO2016-76506-C4-3-R). Sánchez-Fuertes acknowledges the financial support of the Regional Government of Andalusia (project SEJ 1512)

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A. (2001): “The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation”, American Economic Review, 91, 1369-1401.
  • Besley, T. and Persson, T. (2011): Pillars of Prosperity: The Political Economics of Development Clusters, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Butkiewicz, J. L. and Yanikkaya, H. (2006): “Institutional quality and economic growth: Maintenance of the rule of law or democratic institutions, or both?”, Economic Modelling, 23(4), 648-661.
  • Campos, M. M., D. Depalo, E. Papapetrou, R. Ramos and J. J. Pérez (2017): “Understanding the Public Sector Pay Gap”, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 6, 1-29.
  • Campos, J. E., Lien, D. and Pradhan, S. (1999): “The impact of corruption on investment: Predictability matters”, World Development, 27, 1059-1067.
  • Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V. and Teorell, J. (2012): “The merit of meritocratization: Politics, bureaucracy, and the institutional deterrents of corruption”, Political Research Quarterly, 65, 656-668.
  • Döhler, M. (2018): “Discovering the Dark Side of Power: The principal’s moral hazard in political-bureaucratic relations”, International Journal of Public Administration, 41, 190-202.
  • Dollar, D. and Kraay, A. (2003): “Institutions, trade, and growth”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 133-162.
  • Easterly, W. and Levine, R. (2003): “Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 3-39.
  • Economides, G., A, Philippopoulos, and V. Vassilatos (2015): “Public, or private, providers of public goods? A dynamic general equilibrium study”, European Journal of Political Economy, 36, 303-327.
  • Evans, P. and Rauch, J. E. (1999): “Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of Weberian state structures on economic growth”, American Sociological Review, 64, 748-765.
  • Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2004): “Do institutions cause growth?”, Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 271-303.
  • Fernández-de-Córdoba, G., Pérez, J. J. and J.L. Torres (2012): “Public and private sector wages interactions in a general equilibrium model”, Public Choice, 150, 309- 326.
  • Giordano, R., D. Depalo, M. Coutinho Pereira, B. Eugene, E. Papapetrou, J. J. Pérez, L. Reiss, and M. Roter (2015): “The public sector pay gap in a selection of euro area countries in the pre-crisis period”, Hacienda Pública Española/Review of Public Economics, 214, 11-34.
  • Gomes, P. (2018): “Heterogeneity and the public sector wage policy”, International Economic Review, 59 (3), 1469-1489.
  • González-Páramo, J. M. and Onrubia, J. (2003): “Información, evaluación y competencia al servicio de una gestión eficiente de los servicios públicos”, Papeles de Economía Española, 95, 2-23.
  • Hall, R. E. and Jones, C. I. (1999): “Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83-116.
  • Helpman, E. (2008): “Introduction”, in E. Helpman (Ed.), Institutions and economic performance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Knutsen, C. H. (2013): “Democracy, state capacity, and economic growth”, World Development, 43, 1-18.
  • Kollintzas, T., Papageorgiou, D., Tsionas, E. and Vassilatos, V. (2018b): “Market and political power interactions in Greece: An empirical investigation”, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 7, 1-43.
  • Kollintzas, T., D. Papageorgiou and V. Vassilatos (2018a): “Market and political power interactions in Greece: A theory”, European Journal of Political Economy, 53, 59-83.
  • Laffont, J. J. (2000): Incentives and political economy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Lamo, A., Pérez J. J. and Schuknecht, L. (2012): “Public or private sector wage leadership? An international perspective”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 144, 228-244.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1999): “The quality of government”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15, 222-279.
  • Mauro, P. (1995): “Corruption and growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681- 712.
  • Maley, J. and T. Moutos (1996): “Does government employment crowd-out private employment? Evidence from Sweden”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2, 289- 302.
  • Martimort, D. (1996): “The multiprincipal nature of government”, European Economic Review, 40, 673-685.
  • Mueller, D. C. (2003): Public Choice III, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Niskanen, W. A. (1968): “The Peculiar Economics of Bureaucracy”, American Economic Review, 58, 293-305.
  • Niskanen, W. A. (1971): Bureaucracy and Representative Government, AldineAtherton, Chicago, IL.
  • North, D. C. (1989): “Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction”, World Development, 17(9), 1319-1332.
  • North, D. C. (1990): Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Rauch, J. E. (1995): “Bureaucracy, infrastructure, and economic growth: Evidence from U.S. cities during the progressive era”, American Economic Review, 85, 968-979.
  • Rauch, J. E. and Evans, P. B. (2000): “Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries”, Journal of Public Economics, 75, 49-71.
  • Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. and Trebbi, F. (2004): “Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development”, Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131-165.
  • Rosen, H. S, and Gayer, T. (2014): Public Finance, 10th ed., McGraw-Hill Education, New York.
  • Savoia, A. and Sen, K. (2015): “Measurement, evolution, determinants, and consequences of state capacity: a review of recent research”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 29, 441-458.
  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1993): “Corruption”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 599-617.
  • Teorell, J., Dahlberg, S., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., Hartmann, F., and R. Svensson (2015): “The quality of government standard dataset”. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, Sweden. Available online at: www.qog.pol.gu.se
  • Tirole, J. (1994): “The internal organization of government”, Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 1-29.
  • Ujhelyi, G. (2014): “Civil service reform”, Journal of Public Economics, 118, 15-25.
  • Weber, M. (1922): Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen, Mohr. English edition: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, T. Parsons, Hodge, London, 1947.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet