Roles de los iguales y bullying en la escuelaun estudio cualitativo

Referencias bibliográficas

• Andréu, J. (2001). Las técnicas de análisis de contenido: Una revisión actualizada. Documento de trabajo, S2001/03, Centro de estudios andaluces. Recuperado de http://public.centrodeestudiosandaluces.es/pdfs/S200103.pdf
• Anfara, V. A., Brown, K.M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28-38.
• Björkqvist, K., Ekman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. (1982), Bullies and victims: Their ego picture, ideal ego picture and normative ego picture. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 307–313.
• Boulton, M. J., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Bully/victim problems in middle school children: Stability, self–perceived competence, peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 315-325.
• Boulton, M. J., Trueman, L., & Flemington, J. (2002). Associations between secondary school student’s definitions of bullying, attitudes towards bullying, and tendencies to engage in bullying: Age and sex differences. Educational Studies, 28(4), 353–370.
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
• Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1986). The developmental-interactional view of social behavior: Four issues of adolescent aggression. In D. Olweus, J. Block, & M. Radke-Yarrow (Eds.), Development of antisocial and prosocial behaviour, (pp. 315-342). New York: Academic.
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-131.
• DeRosier, M. E., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Patterson, C. J. (1994). Children’s academic and behavioral adjustment as a function of the chronicity and proximity of peer rejection. Child Development, 65, 1799-1813.
• Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R. & Griesler, P. C. (1994). Peer adaptations in the development of antisocial behavior: A confluence model. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Current perspectives on aggressive behavior (pp. 61-95). New York: Plenum.
• Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistici inquiry. A guide to methods. London: Sage.
• Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J. & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer intervention in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527.
• Kärnä, A., Salmivalli, C., Poskiparta, E., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2008). Do bystanders influence the frequency of bullying in a classroom? The XIth EARA conference, Turin, Italy.
• Lynn Hawkins, D., Pepler, D. J. & Craig, W. M. (2001), Naturalis- tic Observations of Peer Interventions in Bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527.
• Mishna, F. (2004). A Qualitative Study of Bullying from Multiple Perspectives. Children & Schools, 26(4), 234-247.
• Moral, C. (2006). Criterios de validez en la investigación cualitativa actual. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 24(1), 147-164.
• O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.
• Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425–440.
• Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615–627.
• Sainio, M., Veenstra, R., Huitsing, G., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 144-151.
• Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: a review. Aggression and Violent Behaviour 15, 112–120.
• Salmivalli, C., Huttunen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. (1997). Peer networks and bullying in schools. Scandinavian. Journal of Psychology, 38, 305–312.
• Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behaviour, 22, 1–15.
• Salmivalli, C., Lappalainen, M., & Lagerspetz, K. (1998). Stability and change of behaviour in connection with bullying in schools: A two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 205–218.
• Singleton, R. A. & Straits, B. C. (2004) Approaches to Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Ba- sics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
• Sutherland, I., & Shepherd, J. P. (2001). Social dimensions of adolescent substance use. Addiction, 96, 445–458.
• Thomas, D. R. (2003). A general inductive approach for qualitati- ve data analysis. School of Population Health, University of Auckland. Recuperado de http:// www.health.auckland.ac.nz/hrmas/resources/qualdatanalysis.html#Purposes
• Valles, M. S. (1997). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social: Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Madrid: Síntesis.
• Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993) A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3–25.
• Wright, J. C., Giammarino, M. & Parad, H. W. (1986). Social status in small groups: Individual group similarity and the social ‘misfit’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 523–36.
• Zapert, K., Snow, D. L., & Tebes, J. K. (2002). Patterns of substance use in early through late adolescence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 835–852.