Análisis de "serious games" anti-"bullying"recursos lúdicos para promover habilidades prosociales en escolares

  1. del Moral Pérez, María Esther 1
  2. Villalustre Martínez, Lourdes 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Zeitschrift:
Revista complutense de educación

ISSN: 1130-2496,  1988-2793

Datum der Publikation: 2018

Ausgabe: 29

Nummer: 4

Seiten: 1345-1364

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5209/RCED.55419 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista complutense de educación

Zusammenfassung

The research is ascribed to Personal and Social Learning & Ethics (PSLE) that advocates for the implementation of serious games (SG) in educational contexts to promote personal and social learning from an ethical perspective. The paper analyzes the educational potential of a sample of free online anti-bullying SG (N = 10) — promoted by international educational institutions — aimed at developing prosocial skills in schoolchildren. The study adopts a qualitative methodology, focused on the content analysis, to identify the strategies they adopt on: 1) psycho-ludic and interactive aspects (typology of exposed aggressions, underlying learning theory and adopted play strategies); and, 2) the degree to which they promote different abilities (analytical, metacognitive and prosocial). Thus, it is verified that most of these games recreate simulations of verbal and physical aggression to victims and damage to their belongings, cyberbullying, threats, blackmail, humiliations, etc., inviting the player to assume roles to identify with the victim or with friends of victims. Their game mechanics help to: discriminate attitudes and negative behaviors, recognize one’s own and others’ feelings, foster empathy to connect with others, make decisions, and resolve assertive conflicts. However, they suffer from dynamics that stimulate communication (negotiating capacity, active listening and assertiveness). This work offers to primary teachers 10 attractive interactive instruments of a playful nature — simulators or role-plays — that can be integrated as didactic resources in preventive programs of the mistreatment between equals. Although they require the design of activities that activate complementary skills related to interpersonal communication, and which invite schoolchildren explicitly to reflect and critically analyze their actions, to promote respect and mutual understanding. An instrument is also presented to systematize content analysis and didactic potential of serious anti-bullying games.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Aldrich, C. (2009). The Complete Guide to Simulations and Serious Games: How the Most Valuable. San Francisco, USA: Pfeiffer.
  • Alklind, A.S., Backlund, P. & Niklasson, L. (2012). The coaching cycle a coaching-by-gaming approach in serious games. Simulation & Gaming, 43(5), 648-672. doi: 10.1177/1046878112439442
  • Adelman, M., Rosenberg, K.E., & Hobart, M. (2016). Simulations and Social Empathy Domestic Violence Education in the New Millennium. Violence against Women, 15. doi: 10.1177/1077801215625850
  • Baranowski, T., Buday, R., Thompson, D.I., & Baranowski, J. (2008). Playing for real: video games and stories for health-related behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(1), 74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.027
  • Blumenfeld, W.J. (2011). Abuse of Human-Computer Intections: A Counterpoint to Transformative and Liberatory Technologies. In G. Kurubacak, & T. Yuzer (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Transformative Online Education and Liberation: Models for Social Equality (pp. 292-311). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-046-4.ch015
  • Breuer, J. S., & Bente, G. (2010). Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4(1), 7-24.
  • Cava, M.J., Buelga S., Musitu G., & Murgui, S. (2010). Violencia escolar entre adolescentes y sus implicaciones en el ajuste psicosocial: Un estudio longitudinal. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 15(1), 21-34.
  • Consejo de Europa (2016). Competences for Democratic Culture. Recuperado de http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/competences_en.asp
  • Cuervo, A. V., & Martínez, A. C. (2014). Relación entre el autoconcepto social, el clima familiar y el clima escolar con el bullying en estudiantes de secundaria. Avances en psicología latinoamericana, 32(3), 447-457.
  • Charsky, D. (2010). From edutainment to serious games: A change in the use of game characteristics. Games and Culture, 5(2), 177-198. doi: 10.1177/1555412009354727
  • Chaux, E. & Velásquez, A.M. (2008). Violencia en los colegios de Bogotá: contraste internacional y algunas recomendaciones. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 55, 14-37
  • Del Moral, M.E. (2004). Pautas procedimentales para el diseño y análisis de videojuegos desde una perspectiva educativa. En M.E. Del Moral (Coord.), Sociedad del Conocimiento, Ocio y Cultura: Un enfoque interdisciplinar, (pp. 407-426). Oviedo: Editorial KRK.
  • Del Moral, M.E. & Fernández, L.C. (2015). Videojuegos en las aulas: implicaciones de una innovación disruptiva para desarrollar las Inteligencias Múltiples. Revista Complutense de Educación, 26 (número extra), 97-118.
  • Del Moral, M.E., Fernández, L.C., & Guzmán, A.P. (2015). Videogames: Multisensory Incentives Boosting Multiple Intelligences in Primary Education. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13(2), 243-270.
  • Del Moral, M.E., Villalustre, L., Yuste, R., & Esnaola, G. (2012). Evaluación y diseño de videojuegos: generando objetos de aprendizaje en comunidades de práctica. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 33. Recuperado de http://www.um.es/ead/red/33/esther_et_al.pdf
  • Díaz-Aguado, M.J. (2006). Sexismo, violencia de género y acoso escolar. Propuestas para una prevención integral de la violencia. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, (73), 38-57.
  • Filella, G.; Cabello, E.; Pérez-Escola, N.; Ros, A. (2016). Evaluación del programa de Educación Emocional “Happy 8-12” para la resolución asertiva de los conflictos entre iguales. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 14(3), 582-602. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.40.15164
  • Gardner, H. (2005). Inteligencias múltiples. La teoría en la práctica. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Garaigordobil, M., & Martínez-Valderrey, V. (2015). Effects of Cyberprogram 2.0 on" face-to-face" bullying, ciberbullying, and empathy. Psicothema, 27(1), 45-51. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.78
  • Girard, C., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2013). Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta‐analysis of recent studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 207-219. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00489.x
  • Gini, G., (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What's wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 6, 528-539.
  • Graesser, A., Chipman, P., Leeming, F., & Biedenbach, S. (2009). Deep learning and emotion in serious games. In U. Ritterfeld, M. Cody & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Serious games: Mechanisms and effects, (pp. 81-100). New York: Routledge.
  • Gradinger, P., Yanagida, T., Strohmeier, D., & Spiel, C. (2016). Effectiveness and sustainability of the ViSC Social Competence Program to prevent cyberbullying and cyber‐victimization: Class and individual level moderators. Aggressive behavior, 42(2), 181-193.
  • Greitemeyer, T., & Osswald, S. (2010). Effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 98(2), 211-221. doi: 10.1177/0146167209333045
  • Hromek, R., & Roffey, S. (2009). Promoting social and emotional learning with games: " It's fun and we learn things". Simulation & Gaming, 40(5), 626-644 doi: 10.1177/1046878109333793
  • Irshad, E., & Atta, M. (2013). Social competence as predictor of bullying among children and adolescents. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 39(1), 35-42.
  • Johnsen, K., Dickerson, R., Raij, A., Lok, B., Jackson, J., Shin, M., ... & Lind, D.S. (2005, March). Experiences in using immersive virtual characters to educate medical communication skills. In Virtual Reality, 2005. Proceedings. VR 2005, (pp. 179-186). Bonn, Germany: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/VR.2005.1492772
  • Kim, B., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(4), 800-810. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.004
  • Lieberman, D.A. (2009). Designing serious games for learning and health in informal and formal settings. In U. Ritterfeld, M. Cody & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Serious games: Mechanisms and effects, (pp. 117-130). New York: Routledge.
  • Mallon, B., & Lynch, R. (2014). Stimulating psychological attachments in narrative games engaging players with game characters. Simulation & Gaming, 45(4-5), 508-527. doi: 10.1177/1046878114553572
  • Martín-Babarro, J. (2014). Assessment and detection of peer-bullying through analysis of group context. Psicothema, 26(3), 357-363. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.85
  • Microsoft (2015). YouthSpark Challenge for Change. Recuperado de https://www.microsoft.com/about/philanthropies/youthspark/youthsparkhub/about-youthspark
  • Muros, B., Aragón, Y. & Bustos, A. (2013). La ocupación del tiempo libre de jóvenes en el uso de videojuegos y redes [Youth’s Usage of Leisure Time with Video Games and Social Networks]. Comunicar, 40, 31-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C40-2013-02-03
  • Olenik-Shemesh, D., Heiman, T., & Rabin, E. (2014). Virtual Anti-Bullying Village Project for Coping with Bullying and Cyberbullying within a 3d Virtual Learning Environment: Evaluation Research. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 7(2), 97-124. doi: 10.7903/ijcse.1147
  • Peng, W., Lee, M., & Heeter, C. (2010). The Effects of a Serious Game on Role‐Taking and Willingness to Help. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 723-742. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01511.x
  • Pereira, G., Brisson, A., Prada, R., Paiva, A., Bellotti, F., Kravcik, M., & Klamma, R. (2012). Serious games for personal and social learning & ethics: status and trends. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 53-65. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.058
  • Powers, R.B., & Kirkpatrick, K. (2013). Playing With Conflict Teaching Conflict Resolution Through Simulations and Games. Simulation & Gaming, 44(1), 51-72. doi: 10.1177/1046878112455487
  • Raminhos, C.S., Claudio, A. P., Carmo, M. B., Carvalhosa, S., de Jesus Candeias, M., & Gaspar, A. (2015, June). A serious game to prevent bullying and promote empathy. In 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), (pp. 1-6). Aveiro, Portugal: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/CISTI.2015.7170404
  • Ramírez, F.C. (2001). Variables de personalidad asociadas en la dinámica bullying (agresores versus víctimas) en niños y niñas de 10 a 15 años. Anales de Psicología, 17(1), 37-43.
  • Raybourn, E.M. (2013). Honing emotional intelligence with game-based crucible experiences. In P. Felicia (Ed.), Developments in Current Game-Based Learning Design and Deployment, (pp. 155-168). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-1864-0.ch012
  • Rincón, A.I., & Ávila, W.D. (2014). Simbiosis vital para describir el ciberbullying en Colombia. Revista Científica General José María Córdova, 12(14), 149-164. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/recig/v12n14/v12n14a09.pdf
  • Salmivalli, C. (2014). Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions?. Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 286-292.
  • Salmivalli, C., & Poskiparta, E. (2012). Making bullying prevention a priority in Finnish schools: The KiVa antibullying program. New Directions for Youth Development, 133, 41-53. doi: 10.1002/yd.20006
  • Sanmartín, M.G., Carbonell, A.E., & Baños, C.P. (2011). Relaciones entre empatía, conducta prosocial, agresividad, autoeficacia y responsabilidad personal y social de los escolares. Psicothema, 23(1), 13-19.
  • Segal, E.A. (2011). Social empathy: A model built on empathy, contextual understanding, and social responsibility that promotes social justice. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(3), 266-277. doi: 10.1080/01488376.2011.564040
  • Sheehan, M. (1999). Workplace bullying: Responding with some emotional intelligence. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 57-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268641
  • Shen, C., Wang, H., & Ritterfeld, U. (2009). Serious games and seriously fun games. In U. Ritterfeld, M. Cody & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Serious games: Mechanisms and effects, (pp. 48-61). New York: Routledge.
  • Stege, L., Van Lankveld, G., & Spronck, P. (2011). Serious games in education. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 10(1), 1-9.
  • Williford, A., Elledge L.C., Boulton, A.J., DePaolis, K.J., Little, T.D., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Effects of the KiVa antibullying program on cyberbullying and cybervictimization frequency among Finnish youth. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 42(6), 820-33. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.787623
  • Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H., & Van Der Spek, E.D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031311
  • Zielke, M.A., Evans, M. J., Dufour, F., Christopher, T.V., Donahue, J. K., Johnson, P., ... & Flores, R. (2009). Serious games for immersive cultural training: Creating a living world. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2, 49-60. http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MCG.2009.30
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet