Consecuencias de la socialización familiar en la cultura española

  1. Musitu Ochoa, Gonzalo
  2. García Pérez, José Fernando
Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2004

Volume: 16

Issue: 2

Pages: 288-293

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicothema

Abstract

Consequences of the family socialization in the Spanish culture. A socialization model with two dimensions ¿demandingness and responsiveness¿ and four typologies ¿authoritative, indulgent, authoritarian and negligent¿ has different implications for children of the Spanish culture that in the Anglo-Saxon culture. The aims of the present research were to confirm that these differences are not due to the effect of the method, and also to replicate previous Spanish studies in which these differences were obtained. Two studies (400 Spanish adolescents in the first one and 4369 in the second one) showed that Spanish children who have received authoritative socialization have the same, or lower, self-concept than children who have received indulgent socialization, the reverse of the relationship found in Anglo-Saxon samples in previous research. These results suggest that the effects of the different socialization typologies cannot be directly generalized to different cultures.

Bibliographic References

  • Barber, B., Chadwick, B. y Oerter, R. (1992). Parental behaviors and adolescent self–esteem in the United States and Germany. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 128-141.
  • Baumrind, D. (1967). Child cares practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 43-88.
  • Baumrind, D. (1971), Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monograph, 4 (1, Pt. 2).
  • Bean, R.A., Bush, K.R., McKenry, P.C. y Wilson, S.M. (2003). The impact of parental support, behavioral control, and psychological control on the academic achievement and self-esteem of African American and European American adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research. 18(5), 523-541.
  • Bersabé, R., Fuentes, M.J. y Motrico, E. (2001). Psychometric analysis of two scales to evaluate parents’ educational styles. Psicothema, 13(4), 678-684.
  • Bersabé, R., Rivas, T., Fuentes, M.J. y Motrico, E. (2002). Aplicación de la Teoría de la Generalizabilidad a una escala para evaluar estilos de autoridad parental. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 4, 111-119.
  • Chao, R.K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1.111-1.119.
  • Chao, R.K. (2001). Extending research on the consequences of parenting style for Chinese Americans and European Americans. Child Development, 72, 1.832-1.843.
  • Darling, N. y Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 487-496.
  • Díez, J. P. y Peirats, E.B. (1997). Analysis of socialization parenting styles related to adolescent alcohol abuse. Psicothema, 9(3), 609-617.
  • Fitts, W.H. (1965). The Tennessee Self-Concept Scale. Nashville, TN: Counselor Recordings and Test.
  • García, J.F., Gracia, E. y Musitu, G. (1988). Diferencias en los tópicos de comunicación entre padres e hijos, según la dirección de la comunicación y las variables sexo, edad y estatus. Cuadernos de Consulta Psicológica, 4, 31-41.
  • García, J.F. y Musitu, G. (1999). AF5. Autoconcepto forma 5. Madrid: TEA ediciones.
  • González, A.R., Holbein, M.F.D. y Quilter, S. (2002). High school students’ goal orientations and their relationship to perceived parenting styles. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 27(3), 450-470.
  • Gracia, E. (2002). Child maltreatment in the context of parental behavior: Parents and children perceptions. Psicothema, 14(2), 274-279.
  • Lamborn, S.D., Mounts, N.S., Steinberg, L. y Dornbusch, S.M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1.049-1.065.
  • Lewis, C.C. (1981). The effects of parental firm control: A reinterpretation of the findings. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 547-563.
  • Maccoby, E.E. y Martin, J.A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction. In Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-101), Mussen P. H. (Ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Marchetti, B. (1997). Concetto di se’relazioni familiari e valori. Tesis de Licenciatura en Psicología Social. Universita degli Studi di Bologna.
  • Musitu, G., García, J.F. y Gutiérrez, M. (1994). AFA-Autoconcepto Forma A (2ª edición). Madrid: TEA.
  • Musitu, G. y García, J.F. (2001). ESPA29. Escala de Socialización Parental en la Adolescencia. Madrid: TEA ediciones.
  • Perris, C., Jaconbon, L., Lindstromg, Von Knorring, L. y Perris, H. (1980). Development of a new inventory for assessing memories of parental rearing behaviour. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 61, 265-274.
  • Smetana, J.G. (1995). Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence. Child Development, 66, 299-315.
  • Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S.M. y Brown, B.B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723-729.
  • Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S., Darling, N., Mounts, N. y Dornbusch, S.M. (1994). Over–time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 65, 754-770.
  • Wang, Q. y Li, J. (2003). Chinese children’s self-concepts in the domains of learning and social relations. Psychology in the Schools, 40(1), 85-101.
Data source: Dialnet