Hacia la medida de la innovación empresarialel proceso de validación de escalas

Referencias bibliográficas

• ABDEL-KADER, M. G., y DUGDALET, D. [1998]: «Investment in advanced manufacturing technology: A study of practice in large U.K. companies», Management Accounting Research, vol. 9, 261-284.
• AHIRE, S. L.; GOLHAR, D. Y., y WALLER, M. A. [1996]: «Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs», Decision Sciences, vol. 27, no. 1, 23-56. (Pubitemid 126084055)
• ALVAREZ, M. J. [1993]: «Cambio tecnológico y Contabilidad de Gestión. Los sistemas de información y las nuevas estrategias productivas», en CARMONA, S. (Ed.): Cambio tecnológico y Contabilidad de Gestión, Madrid: ICAC, Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda.
• AMABILE, T. M.; CONTI, R.; COON, H.; LAZENBY, J., y HERRON, M. [1996]: «Assesing the work environment for creativity», Academy of Management Journal, vol. 39, no. 5, 1154-1184.
• ANDERSON, J. C.; CLEVELAND, G., y SCHROEDER, R. G. [1989]: «Operations strategy: A literature review», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 8, 133-158.
• AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION (AERA), AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (APA) y NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION (NCME) [1985]: Standards for Educational and Psichological testing, Washington, D.C.: American Psichological Association.
• BLACK, S. A., y PORTER, L. J. [1996]: «Identification of the critical factors of TQM», Decision Sciences, vol. 27, no.1, 1-21.
• BOYER, K. K; LEONG, G. K.; WARD, P. T., y KRAJEWSKI, L. J. [1997]: «Unlocking the potential of advanced manufacturing technologies», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 15, 331-347. (Pubitemid 127403184)
• BROWNE, M. W. [1984]: «The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices», British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol. 37, mayo, 1-21.
• CAMISÓN, C. [1999]: «Sobre cómo medir las competencias distintivas: un examen empírico de la fiabilidad y validez de los modelos multi-ítem para la medición de los activos intangibles», Comunicación presentada a la First International Conference de The Iberoamerican Academy of Management celebrada en Madrid.
• CAMISÓN, C., y Bou, J. C. [2000]: «Calidad percibida de la empresa: desarrollo y validación de un instrumento de medida», Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol. 9, no. 1, 9-24.
• CAMPBELL, D. T., y FISKE, D. W. [1959]: «Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix», Psychological Bulletin, vol. 56, 81-105.
• CAÑIBANO, L.; GARCÍA-AYUSO, M.; SÁNCHEZ, P.; CHAMINADE, C.; OLEA, M., y ESCOBAR, C. G. [1999]: «Medición de intangibles. Discusión de los indicadores seleccionados. Estudio de un caso español», Comunicación presentada al X Congreso de la Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas celebrado en Zaragoza.
• CAÑIBANO, L.; GARCIA-AYUSO, M., y SÁNCHEZ, P. [1999]: «La relevancia de los intangibles para la valoración y la gestión de empresas», Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, vol. 28, no. 100.
• CARMINES, E. G., y ZELLER, R. A. [1979]: Reliability and validity assessment, Beverly Hills: Sage.
• CHAU, P. Y. K. [1999]: «On the use of construct reliability in MIS research: a metaanalysis», Information and Management, vol. 35, 217-227.
• CHRYSSOCHOIDIS, G. M., y WONG, V. [2000]: «Customización of product technology and international new product success: Mediating effects of new product development and rollout timeliness», The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 17, 268-285.
• CHURCHIL, G. A. [1979]: «A paradigm for developping better measures of marketing constructs», Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 16, 64-73.
• CLARK, K. B.; CHEW, W. B., y FUJIMOTO, T. [1987]: «Product development in the world auto industry», Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 729-771.
• CLARK, K. B., y FUJIMOTO, T. [1991]: Product development performance, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• COHEN, W. [1995]: «Empirical studies of innovative activity», en STONEMAN, P. (Ed.): Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
• COOMBS, R.; NARANDRENM, P., y RICHARDS, A. [1996]: «A literature-based innovation output indicator», Research Policy, vol. 25, 403-413.
• CRONBACH, L. J. [1951]: «Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests», Psychometrika, vol. 16, no. 3, 297-334.
• DAVENPORT, T. H. [1993]: Process Innovation. Reengineering work through Information technolog, Ernst & Young. Harvard Business School Press. Boston Massachusets.
• DABHOLKAR, P. A.; THORPE, D. I., y RENTZ, J. O. [1996]: «A measure.of service quality for retail stores: Scale development and validation», Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 24, no. 1, 3-16. (Pubitemid 126011293)
• DE VAUS, D. A. [1990]: Surveys in social research, London: Unwin Hyman.
• EUROPEAN INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION [1995]: Evaluation of R&D projects, Paris: EIRMA.
• FLYNN, B. B.; SCHROEDER, R. G., y SAKAKIBARA, S. [1994]: «A Framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument», Journal of Operations Research, vol. 1, no. 4, 339-366.
• FLYNN, B. B.; SCHROEDER, R. G., y FLYNN, E. J. [1999]: «World Class manufacturing: An investigation of Hayes and Wheelwright's foundation», Journal of Operations Research, vol. 17, 249-269.
• GALENDE, J., y SUÁREZ, I. [1998]: «Los factores determinantes de las inversiones empresariales en I+D», Economía Industrial, no. 319, 63-76.
• GAMBAU [1997]: «Análisis microeconómico de los determinantes de la innovación: aplicación a las empresas industriales españolas», Revista Española de Economía, vol. 14, no. 1, 41-66.
• GEMSER, G., y LEENDERS, M. A. A. M. [2001]: «How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance», The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 18, 28-38.
• GUARNIZO, J. V., y GUADAMILLAS, F. [1998]: «Innovación y desarrollo tecnológico en las empresas industriales españ olas», Economía Industrial, no. 319, 49-62.
• HAYES, R. H., y WHEELWRIGHT, S. C. [1984]: Restoring our competitive edge; Competing throught manufacturing, New York: Wiley.
• HENSLEY, R. [1999]: «A review of operations management studies using scale development techniques», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 17, 343-358.
• HOWELL, J. M., y SHEA, C. M. [2001]: «Individual differences, environmental scanning, innovation framing, and champion behaviour: Key predictors of project performance», The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 18, 15-27.
• JAYARAM, J.; DROGE, C., y VICKERY, S. K. [1999]: «The impact of human resource management practices on manufacturing performance», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 18, 1-20. (Pubitemid 32080764)
• JORESKOG, K. [1971]: «Statistical analysis of sets of codgenric test», Psycometrica, vol. 36, junio, 109-142.
• KERLINGER, F. N. [1975]: Investigación del comportamiento. Técnicas y metodología, México: Nueva Editorial Interamericana, S.A. de C.V.
• KLEINKNECHT, A. [1993]: New concepts in innovation output measurement. Kleinkecht, A., y Bain, D. (Edits.), St. Martin's Press.
• KOSTE, L. L., y MALHOTRA, M. K. [1999]: «A theoretical framework for analyzing the dimensions of manufacturing flexibility», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 19, 75-93.
• KWORK, W. C. C., y SHARP, D. J. [1998]: «A review of construct measurement issues in Behavioural Accounting research», Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 17, 137-174.
• LATIESA, M. [1998]: «Validez y fiabilidad de las observaciones sociológicas», en GARCÍA, M.; IBÁÑEZ, J., y ALVIRA, F. (Coord.): Análisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigación, Madrid: Alianza Editorial).
• MADRIGAL, R., y MILLER, C. M. [1996]: «Construct validity of spouses' relative influence measures: an application of the Direct Product Model», Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 24, no. 2, 152-170.
• MARTÍNEZ, R. [1995]: Psicometría: Teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos, Madrid: Editorial Síntesis, SA.
• MESSICK, S. [1980]: «Test validity and the ethics of assessment», American Psychologist, vol. 35: 1012-1027.
• MINISTERIO DE INDUSTRIA Y ENERGÍA [1994]: Encuesta sobre estrategias empresariales, Madrid: Ministerio de Industria y Energía.
• MINOR, E. D.; HENSLEY, R. L., y WOOD, D. R. [1994]: «A review of empirical manufacturing studies», International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 14, no. 1, 5-25.
• NUNNALLY, J. C. [1978]: Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2.a ed.
• OCDE [1991]: OCDE Proposed Guidelines for Colecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (Oslo Manual), DSTI/STII/IND/STO (91) 3, París.
• - [1996]: The measurement of Scientific and technological activities. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Oslo Manual, European Commission (EUROSTAT).
• O'LEARY-KELLY, S. W., y VOKURKA, R. J. [1998]: «The empirical assessment of construct validity», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 16, 386-405.
• PATEL, P., y PAVITT, K. [1995]: «Patterns of technological activity: their measurement and interpretation», en STONEMAN, P. (Ed.): Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
• PETER, J. P., y CHURCHILL, G. A. [1986]: «Relationships among research design choices and psychometric properties of rating scales: A meta-analysis», Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 23, 1-10.
• REARDON, J.; MILLER, C. E., y COE, B. [1995]: «Applied scale development: Measurement of store image», Journal of Applied Business Research, vol. 11, no. 4, 85-93.
• SAKAKTBARA, S.; FLYNN, B. B., y SCHROEDER, R. G. [1993]: «A framework and measurement instrument for just-in-time manufacturing», Production and Operations Management, vol. 2, no. 3, 177-194.
• SAMSON, D., y TERZIOVSKI, M. [1999]: «The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 17, 393-409.
• SÁNCHEZ, M., y SARABIA, F. J. [1999]: «Validez y fiabilidad de escalas», en SARABIA, F. J. (Coord.): Metodología para la investigación en marketing y dirección de empresas, Madrid: Editorial Pirámide.
• SARAPH, J. V.; BENSON, P. G., y SCHROEDER, R. G. [1989]: «An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management», Decision Sciences, vol. 20, 810-829.
• SCHWAB, D. P. [1980]: «Construct validity in organizational behavior», Organizational Behavior, vol. 2, 3-43.
• SCHUMPETER, J. A. [1912]: Teoría del desenvolvimiento económico, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 3. a ed., 1963.
• SHERMAN, J. D.; SOUDER, W. E., y JENSSEN, S. A. [2000]: «Differencial effects of the primary forms of cross functional integration on product development cycle time», The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 17, 257-267.
• SMALL, M. H., y YASIN, M. M. [1997]: «Advanced manufacturing technology: Implementation policy and performance», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 15, 349-370. (Pubitemid 127403185)
• TRACEY, M.; VONVEREMBSE, M., y LIM, J. S. [1999]: «Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: Keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving perfomance», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 17, 411-428.
• URRACA, A. [1998]: «I+D y recursos alternativos a la innovación en la industria española», Economía Industrial, no. 319, 91-104.
• VICKERY, S. K.; DROGE, C., y GERMAIN, R. [1999]: «The relationship between product customization and organizational structure», Journal of Operations Management, vol. 17: 377-391.
• WARD, P. T.; LEONG, G. K., y BOYER, K. K. [1994]: «Manufacturing proactiveness and performance», Decision Science, vol. 25, no. 3, 337-358.