Tipología de relaciones de empleoUna propuesta integradora

  1. Rosa Navarro, Dolores de la
  2. Cabrera, Elizabeth F.
Aldizkaria:
Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

ISSN: 1576-5962

Argitalpen urtea: 2008

Alea: 24

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 81-112

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.4321/S1576-59622008000100005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

Laburpena

Over the last few years, the growing recognition of the importance of human resources for organizational excellence has led to an increased emphasis on employee loyalty. Nonetheless, not all employees experience the same type of employee relationship, either due to the organizations concern for economic efficiency or simply as a consequence of dif- ferent supervisory approaches to people management. In any case, we believe that organi- zations should on one hand define clearly the type of relationship they want to establish with their employees and on the other hand should make an effort to be consistent in the different human resources practices and in the organization’s strategy. This is necessary to ensure that the diverse messages individuals get, help them develop realistic expectations to lower the likelihood of perceiving a breach in their psychological contract. We have therefore reviewed the classifications of employment relationships developed by authors from different research areas in order to suggest a synthesis that combines the most impor- tant features of each.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Arthur, J.B. (1992). The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel minimills. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 488-506.
  • Arthur, J.B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (3), 670-687.
  • Atkinson, C. (2007). Building high performance employment relationships in small firms. Employee Relations, 29(5), 506-519.
  • Baron, J.N. y Kreps, D.M. (1999). Strategic Human Resources: Frameworks for General Managers. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Becker, B. y Gerhart, G. (1996). The impact of HRM on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 779- 801.
  • Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Blau, P.M. (1982). Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Boudreau, J.W. y Ramstad, P.M. (1999). Human resource metrics: Can measure be strategic? En P. Wright, L. Dyer, B.J. Boudreau y G. Milkovich (Eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (suplemento 4), 75-98. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Cappelli, P. y Newmark, D. (2001). Do “high performance” work practices improve establishment level outcomes? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, 737-775.
  • Cappelli, P. y Singh, H. (1992). Integrating strategic human resources and strategic management. En D. Lewin, O.S. Mitchell, y P. Sherer (Eds.), Research Frontiers in Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 165-192. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.
  • Coyle-Shapiro, J. A-M. y Conway, N. (2004). The employment relationship through the lens of social exchange. En J. Coyle-Shapiro, L. Shore, S. Taylor y L. Tetrick (Eds.), The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives, 5-28. Oxford University Press.
  • Coyle-Shapiro, J. A-M., Shore, L.M., Taylor, M.S. y Tetrick, L.E. (2004). The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
  • Delery, J.E. (1998). Issues of fit in strategic human resource management: Implications for research. Human Resource Management Review, 8 (3), 289- 309.
  • Delery, J.E. y Doty, D.H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: tests of universalis- tic, contingency and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (4), 802-835.
  • Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
  • Fox, Alan (1974). Beyond contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations. London: Farber and Farber Limited.
  • Gakovic, A. y Tetrick, L.E. (2003). Perceived organizational support and work status: a comparison of the employ- ment relationships of part-time and fulltime employees attending university classes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5): 649–666.
  • Gerhart, B., Wright, P.M., McMahan, G.C. y Snell, S.A. (2000). Measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimate? Personnel Psychology, 53, 803- 834.
  • Grimmer, M. y Oddy, M. (2007). Violation of the psychological contract: The mediating effect of relational versus transactional beliefs. Australian Journal of Management, 32(1): 153-174.
  • Huselid, M.A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (3), 635-672.
  • Ichniowski, C. y Shaw, K. (1999). The effects of human resource management systems on economic performance: An international comparison of US and Japanese plants. Management Science, 45, 704–721.
  • Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K. y Prennushi, G. (1997). The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. The American Economic Review, 87 (3).
  • Lam, L.W. y White, L.P. (1998). Human resource orientation and corporate performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9, 351–364.
  • Lawler, E.E. (1988). Choosing an Involvement Strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 2 (3), 197-204.
  • Lee, J. y Miller, D. (1999). People matter: Commitment to employees, strategy and performance in Korean firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 579–593.
  • Lee, M.B. y Chee, Y. (1996). Business strategy, participative human resource management and organizational performance: The case of South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 34, 77–94.
  • Lepak, D.P. y Snell, S.A. (1999). The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24 (1), 31-48.
  • Lepak, D.P. y Snell, S.A. (2002). Examining the Human Resource Architecture: the Relationship among Human Capital, Employment, and Human Resource Configurations. Journal of Management, 28 (4): 517-543.
  • Macneil, I. R. (1980). The New Social Contract. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Maharaj, K., Ortlepp, K. y Stacey, A. (2008). Psychological contracts and employment equity practices: A comparative study. Management Dynamics, 17(1): 16-30.
  • Mahoney, T.A. y Watson, M.R. (1993). Evolving modes of workforce governance: An evaluation. En B.E. Kaufman y M.N. Kleiner (Eds.), Employee representation: Alternative and future directions, 135- 168. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association, University of Wisconsin.
  • McDuffie, J.P. (1995). HR Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organiza- tional Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 48, 197- 221.
  • McMahan, G.C., Virick, M. y Wright, P.M. (1999). Alternative theoretical perspectives for SHRM. Progress, problems, and prospects. En P. Wright, L. Dyer, J. Boudreau y G. Milkovich (Eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (suplemento 4), 99-122. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Osterman, P. (1988). Employment futures: Reorganization, dislocation, and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ostroff, C. (2000). Human resource management and firm performance: Prac- tices, systems, and contingencies. Documento de trabajo, Arizona State University.
  • Ouchi, W.G. (1980). Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129-143.
  • Ouchi, W.G. y Johnson, J.B. (1978). Types of organizational control and their relationship to emotional well-being. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 293-317.
  • Pearce, J. y Peters R.H. (1985). A con- tradictory norm view of employeremployee exchange. Journal of Management, 11 (1), 19-30.
  • Rousseau, D.M. (1995). Psychological contract in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Rousseau, D.M. (2000). Psychological contract inventory. Informe técnico nº 2000-02: The Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University.
  • Rousseau, D.M. y Greller, M. (1994). Human resource practices: administrative contract makers. Human Resource Management, 33, 385-401.
  • Rousseau, D.M. y McLean Parks, J. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. En L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 1-47. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Rubery, J., Earnshaw, J., Marchington, M., Lee Cooke, F. y Vincent, S. (2002). Changing organizational forms and the employment relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (5), 645-672.
  • Schalk, R. (2004). Changes in the employment relationship across time. En J. Coyle-Shapiro, L. Shore, S. Taylor y L. Tetrick (Eds.), The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives, 284-311. Oxford University Press.
  • Shore, L.M. y Barkslade, K. (1998). Examining degree of balance and level of obligation in the employment relationship: a social exchange approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 731-744.
  • Shore, L.M., Tetrick, L.E., CoyleShapiro, J. A-M. y Taylor, M.S. (2004). Direction for future research. En J. CoyleShapiro, L. Shore, S. Taylor y L. Tetrick (Eds.), The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives, 351-364. Oxford University Press.
  • Tsui, A.S. y Wang, D.X. (2002). Employment relationships from employer’s perspective: Current research and future directions. En C.L. Cooper y I.T. Robertson (Eds.). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 77-114. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Tsui, A.S., Pearce, J.L., Porter, L.W. y Hite, J.P. (1995). Choice of employee- organization relationship: Influence of external and internal organizational factors. En G.R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 117-151. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Tsui, A.S., Pearce, J.L., Porter, L.W. y Tripoli, A.M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1089-1121.
  • Walton, R.E. (1985). From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, Marzo-Abril, 77-84.
  • Wright, P.M. y Boswell, W.R. (2002). Desegregating HRM: A review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research. Journal of Management, 28 (3), 247-276.
  • Wright, P.M. y Sherman, W.S. (1999). Failing to find fit in strategic human resource management: Theoretical and empirical problems. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (suplemento 4), 53-74. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Wright, P.M. y Snell, S.A. (1998). Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 23 (4), 756-772.
  • Youndt, M.A., Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W. y Lepak, D.P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (4), 836-866.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet