Diseño de pagos para aproximaciones no paramétricas en valoración contingente con formato dicotómico simple

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alberini, A. y Carson, R. T. (1993), "Choice of thresholds for efficient binary discrete choice estimation", Discussion paper 90-34R, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego.
• Alberini, A. (1995), Testing willingness to pay models of discrete choice contingent valuation survey data, Land Economics, 71, 1: 83-95.
• An, M. Y. (2000), "A semiparametric distribution for willingness to pay and statistical inference with dichotomous choice contingent valuation data", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82, 3: 487-500.
• Araña, J. E. y León, C. J. (2005), "Flexible mixture distribution modeling of dichotomous choice contingent valuation with heterogeneity", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50: 170-188.
• Araña, J. E. y León, C. J. (2006), "Modelling unobserved heterogeneity in contingent valuation of health risks", Applied Economics, 38, 19: 2.315-2.325.
• Ayer, M.; Brunk, H. D.; Ewing, G. M.; Reid, W. T. y Silverman, E. (1955), "An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information", Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26, 4: 641-647.
• Bishop, R. C. y Heberlein, T. A. (1979), "Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased?", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 5: 926-930.
• Boman, M.; Bostedt, G. y Kriström, B. (1999), "Obtaining welfare bounds in discrete-response valuation studies: A non-parametric approach", Land Economics, 75, 2: 284-294.
• Brouwer, R. (2006), "Do stated preference methods stand the test of time? A test of the stability of contingent values and models for health risks when facing an extreme event", Ecological Economics, 60, 2: 399-406.
• Carson, R. T. (2007), Contingent valuation. A comprehensive bibliography and history, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
• Casey, J. F.; Kahn, J. R. y Rivas, A. (2006), "Willingness to pay for improved water service in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil", Ecological Economics, 58, 2: 365-372.
• Chen, H. Z. y Randall, A. (1997), "Semi-nonparametric estimation of binary response models with an application to natural resource valuations», Journal of Econometrics, 76, 2: 323-340.
• Cooper, J. (1993), "Optimal bid selection for dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24, 1: 25-40.
• Cooper, J. (2002), "Flexible functional form estimation of willingness to pay using dichotomous choice data", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43, 2: 267-279.
• Creel, M. y Loomis, J. (1997), "Semi-nonparametric distribution-free dichotomous choice contingent valuation", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 3: 341-358.
• Crooker, J. R. y Herriges, J. A. (2004), "Parametric and semi-nonparametric estimation of willingness-to-pay in the dichotomous choice contingent valuation framework", Environmental and Resource Economics, 27, 4: 451-480.
• Del Saz-Salazar, S. y García-Menéndez, L. (2001), "Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in a large city. Evidence from the Spike Model and from a Non-Parametric Approach", Environmental and Resource Economics, 20, 2: 103-112, 2001.
• Duffield, J. W. y Patterson, D. A. (1991), "Inference and optimal design for a welfare measure in dichotomous choice contingent valuation", Land Economics, 67, 2: 225-239.
• Hanemann, W. M. (1984), "Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses", American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66, 3: 332-341.
• Hanemann, W. M. y Kanninen, B. (1996), "The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data", Working Paper, 798, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California at Berkeley.
• Hanemann, W. M. y Kanninen, B. (1999), "The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data", en I. Bateman y Willis, K. G. (eds.), Valuing environmental preferences: Theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the U.S, E.C. and developing countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 302-441.
• Härdle, W.; Müller, M.; Sperlich, S. y Werwatz, A. (2004), Nonparametric and semiparametric models. An Introduction, New York, NY: Springer.
• Horowitz, J. L. (1998), Semiparametric methods in econometrics, New York, NY: Springer.
• Horowitz, J. L. y Härdle, W. (1994), "Testing a parametric model against a semiparametric alternative", Econometric Theory, 10: 821-848.
• Horowitz, J. L. y Savin, N. E. (2001), "Binary response models: Logits, probits and semiparametrics", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 4: 43-56.
• Huhtala, A. (2000), "Binary choice valuation studies with heteregeneous preferences regarding the program being valued", Environmental and Resource Economics, 16, 3: 263-279.
• Kanninen, B. J. (1991), "Optimal experimental design for contingent valuation surveys", PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
• Kanninen, B. J. (1993), "Optimal experimental design for double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation", Land Economics, 69, 2: 138-146.
• Kanninen, B. J. y Kriström, B. (1993), "Sensitivity of willingness to pay estimates to bid design in dichotomous choice valuation models: Comment", Land Economics, 69, 2: 199-202.
• Kriström, B. (1990), "A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies", Land Economics, 66, 2: 135-139.
• Kristöm, B. (1997), "Spike models in contingent valuation", American Journal of Agricultural Economcis, 79: 1013-1023.
• Layton, D. F. y Moeltner, K. (2005), "The cost of power outages to heterogeneous households. An application of the gamma-lognormal distribution", en Scarpa, R. y Alberini, A. (eds.), Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, Dordrecht: Springer Publishing, 35-54.
• Le Cessie, S. y Van Houwelingen, J. C. (1991), "A goodness-of-fit test for binary regression models, based on smoothing methods", Biometrika, 47: 267-1282.
• Lehtonen, E.; Kuuluvainen, J.; Pouta, E.; Rekola, M. y Li, C. (2003), "Non-market benefits of forest conservation in southern Finland", Environmental Science & Policy, 6, 3: 195-204.
• Loureiro, M. L.; Loomis, J. B. y Nahuelhual, L. (2004), "A comparison of a parametric and a non-parametric method to value a non-rejectable public good", Journal of Forest Economics, 10, 2: 61-74.
• McFadden, D. (1994), "Contingent valuation and social choice", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 4: 689-708.
• McFadden, D. (1999), "Computing willingness to pay in random utility model", en Moore, J.; Riezman, R. y Melvin, J. (Eds.), Trade, theory and econometrics: Essays in honour of John S. Chipman, London: Routledge, 253-274.
• Menegakia, A. N.; Hanley, N.; Tsagarakis, K. P. (en prensa), "The social acceptability and valuation of recycled water in Crete: A study of consumers' and farmers' attitudes", Ecological Economics.
• Menzel. S. y Scarpa, R. (2005), "Protection motivation theory and contingent valuation: perceived realism, threat and WTP estimates for biodiversity protection", Working Paper, 26.05, FEEM.
• Mitchell, R. C. y Carson, R. T. (1989), Using surveys to value public goods. The contingent valuation method, Washington, D.C.: Resources for the future.
• Nyquist, H. (1990), "Optimal designs of discrete response experiments in contingent valuation studies", Statistical Research Report, University of Umea.
• Ozuna, T.; Jang, K. y Stoll, J. R. (1993), "Testing for misspecification in the referendum contingent valuation approach", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 2: 332-338.
• Proença, I. y Ritter, C. (1994), "Semiparametric testing of the link function in models for binary outcomes", Discussion Paper, 9415, Institut de Statistique, Université Catholique de Louvain.
• Proença, I. y Santos Silva, J. M. C. (2000), "Parametric and semiparametric specification tests for binary choice models: A comparative simulation study", Working Paper, 07-2000, CEMAPRE, Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
• Provencher, K.; Baerenklau, A. y Bishop, R. C. (2002), "A finite mixture logit model of recreational angling with serially correlated random utility bill", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 4: 1066-1075.
• Scarpa, R. y Bateman, I. (2000), "Efficiency gains afforded by improved bid design versus follow-up valuation questions in discrete-choice CV studies", Land Economics, 76, 2: 299-311.
• Scarpa, R.; Willis, K. y Garrod, G. (2001), "Estimating benefits for effective enforcement of speed reduction from dichotomous-choice CV. The case of rural trunk roads", Environmental and Resource Economics, 20, 4: 281-304.
• Silvey, S. D. (1980), Optimal design. An introduction to the theory for parameter estimation, New York, NY: Chapman and Hall Ltd.
• Werner, M. (1999), "Allowing for zeros in dichotomous choice contingent valuation models", Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. 17, 4: 479-486.