¿Qué pueden aportar las ciencias cognitivas al análisis de las políticas públicas?un análisis comparado

Referencias bibliográficas

• ANDLER, DANIEL (1992): Introduction aux sciences cognitives, París, Folio.
• ARONSON, ELLIOT (1992): «The Return of the Repressed: Dissonance Theory Makes a Comeback», Pychological Inquiry, vol. 3, núm. 4, págs. 303-311.
• BAUMGARTNER, FRANCK R. y BRYAN D. JONES (1993): «Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems», The Journal of Politics, vol. 53, núm. 4, págs. 1044-1074.
• BERGER, PETER y THOMAS LUCKMANN (1966): The Social Construction of Reality, New York, Penguin.
• BOUDON, RAYMOND (1986): L'idéologie. L'origine des idées reçues, París, Fayard.
• BOUDON, RAYMOND, ALBAN BOUVIER y FRANÇOIS CHAZEL (eds.) (1997): Cognition et sciences sociales. La dimension cognitive dans l'analyse sociologique, París, Presses Universitaires de France.
• BOYER, PASCAL (2001): Religion Explained: The Human Instincts that fashion Gods, Spirits and Ancestors, London, Vintage.
• BREHM, JACKW. y ARTHUR R. COHEN (1962): Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance, New York, Wiley.
• CHOMSKY, NOAM (1965): Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
• CICOUREL, AARON V. (1979): La sociologie cognitive, París, Presses Universitaires de France.
• COHEN, MICHAEL D., JAMES G. MARCH y JOHAN P. OLSEN (1972): «A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice», Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 17, núm. 1, págs. 1-25.
• DENNETT, DANIEL C. (1984): Elbow Room. The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
• ELDER, ROGER y CHARLES COBB (1983): The Political Use of Symbols, New York, Longman.
• EYERMAN, RON y ANDREW JAMISON (1991): Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach, Cambridge (ENG), Polity Press.
• FESTINGER, LEON (1957): Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Evanston, Row and Peterson.
• GARDNER, HOWARD (1993): Histoire de la révolution cognitive: La nouvelle science de l'esprit, Paris, Payot.
• GOETHALS, GEORGE R. (1992): «Dissonance and Self-Justification», Psychological Inquiry, vol. 3, núm. 4, pags. 328-345.
• GOUIN, RODOLPHE (2007), «Dispositions», en VINCENT BOURDEAU y ROBERTOMERRILL, (eds.), DicoPo, Dictionnaire de théorie politique, 2007 <http://www.dicopo.org/spip.php?article45>
• GOUIN, RODOLPHE y JEAN-BAPTISTE HARGUINDÉGUY (2007): «De l'usage des sciences cognitives dans l'analyse des politiques publiques», Swiss Political Science Review, vol. 13, núm. 3, págs. 369-393.
• HALL, PETER A. (1986): Governing the Economy. The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• HALL, PETER A. (1992): «The Movement From Keynesianism to Monetarism. Institutional Analysis and British Economic Policy in the 1970'», en SVEN STEINMO, KATHLEEN THELEN y FRANK LONGSTRETH (eds.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, New York, Cambridge University Press, págs. 90-113.
• HALL, PETER A. (1993): «Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State. The Case of Economic Policy-Making in Britain», Comparative Politics, vol. 25, núm. 3, págs. 275-296.
• HALL, PETER A. (1997): «The Role of Interests, Institutions, and Ideas in the Comparative Political Economy of Industrialized Nations», enMARK I. LICHBACH y ALAN S. ZUCKERMAN (eds.), Comparative Politics. Rationality, Culture and Structure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, págs. 174-207.
• HECLO, HUGH (1974): Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden, New Haven, Yale University Press.
• HOLSTI, OLE R. (1962): «The Belief System and National Images: A Case Study», Journal of Conflict Resolution, núm. 6, págs. 244-252.
• JERVIS, ROBERT (1968): «Hypotheses on Misperception», World Politics, vol. 20, núm. 3, págs. 454-479.
• JERVIS, ROBERT (1976): Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
• JERVIS, ROBERT (1993): «The Drunkard's Search», en SHANTO IYENGAR y WILLIAM J. MCGUIRE (eds.), Explorations in Political Psychology, Washington, Duke University Press, págs. 338-360.
• JOBERT, BRUNO y PIERRE MULLER (1987): L'État en action, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
• JONES, BRYAN D. (2001): Politics and the Architecture of Choice. Bounded Rationality and Governance, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
• JONES, BRYAN D. (2002): «Bounded Rationality and Public Policy: Herbert Simon and the Decisional Foundation of Collective Choice», Policy Sciences, vol. 35, págs. 269-284.
• JONES, BRYAN D. (2003): «Bounded Rationality and Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration and Public Policy», Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 13, núm. 4, págs. 395-412.
• JONES, CHARLES O. (1970): An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy, Belmont, Duxbury Press.
• KELMAN, HERBERT y ALFRED BLOOM (1973): «Assumptive Frameworks in International Politics», en JEANNE KNUTSON (ed.), Handbook in Political Psychology, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, págs. 261-295.
• KHONG, YUEN FOONG (1992): Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
• KING, GARY, ROBERT O. KEOHANE y SIDNEY VERBA (1994): Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
• KINGDON, JOHN W. (1997): Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, New York, Pearson Education.
• KUHN, THOMAS (1975): The Structure of Scientific Revolution, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
• KUKLINSKI, JAMES H. (ed.) (2001): Citizens and Politics. Perspectives from Political Psychology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• KUKLINSKI, JAMES H. (2002): Thinking about Political Psychology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• LARSON, DEBORAH W. (1985): Origins of Containment: A Psychological Explanation, Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press.
• LASSWELL, HAROLD D. (1956): The Decision Process: Seven Categories of Functional Analysis, College Park, University of Maryland Press.
• LORD, CHARLES, LEE ROSS y MARK R. LEPPER (1979): «Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence », Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, núm. 37, págs. 2098-2109.
• LUPIA, ARTHURyMATHEW D. MCCUBBINS (1998): The Democratic Dilemma. Can Citizens Learn What They Need To Know?, New York, Cambridge University Press.
• LUPIA, ARTHUR, MATHEW D. MCCUBBINS y SAMUEL L. POPKIN (1998): Elements of Reason. Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, New York, Cambridge University Press.
• MASSAD, PHILLIP M.; BRUNO SALES y PAUL A. SABATIER (1983): «Influencing State Legislative Decisions», Applied Social Psychology Annual, núm. 4, págs. 95-116.
• QUATTRONE, GEORGE A. yMOS TVERSKY (1988): «Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice», American Political Science Review, núm. 82, 719-736.
• RADAELLI, CLAUDIO (1995): «The Role of Knowledge in the Policy Process», Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 2, núm. 2, págs. 159-183.
• RENWICK MONROE, KRISTEN (2002): Political Psychology, Mahwah (N.J.), Erlbaum.
• ROSATI, JEREL A. (1995): «A Cognitive Approach to the Study of Foreign Policy», en LAURA, NEACK, JEANNE HEY y PATRICK HANEY (eds.), Foreign Policy Analysis, Englewood Cliffs (NJ), Prentice Hall, págs. 49-70.
• SABATIER, PAUL A. (1998): «The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe», Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 5, núm. 1, págs. 98-130.
• SABATIER, PAUL A. y SUSAN HUNTER (1998): «The Incorporation of Causal Perceptions Into Models of Elite Belief Systems», Western Political Quarterly, núm. 42, págs. 229-261.
• SABATIER, PAUL A. y HANK JENKINS-SMITH (1999): «The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment», en PAUL A. SABATIER (ed.): Theories of The Policy Process, Boulder, Westview Press, págs. 117-168.
• SABATIER, PAUL A. y EDELLA SCHLAGER (2000): «Les approches cognitives des politiques publiques: Perspectives américaines», Revue Française de Science Politique, vol. 50, núm. 2, págs. 209-234.
• SABATIER, PAUL A., SUSAN HUNTER y SUSAN M. MCLAUGHLIN (1987): «The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents», The Western Political Quarterly, vol. 40, núm. 3, pags. 449-476.
• SHAPIRO, MICHAEL J. y MATTHEW BONHAM (1973): «Cognitive Process and Foreign Policy Decision-Making», International Studies Quarterly, vol. 17, núm. 2, págs. 147-174.
• SHOUP, BRIAN (2001): Policy Currents, vol. 11, núm. 2 <http://apsapolicysection.org/vol11_2/112.pdf>.
• SIMON, HERBERT (1957), Models of Man, New York, Wiley.
• SPERBER, DAN (1996): Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach, Cambridge (Mass.), Blackwell.
• SPERBER, DAN (1997): «Individualisme méthodologique et cognitivisme», en RAYMOND BOUDON, ALBAN BOUVIER y FRANÇOIS CHAZEL (eds.), Cognition et sciences sociales. La dimension cognitive dans l'analyse sociologique, París, Presses Universitaires de France, págs. 123-136.
• SPERBER, DAN y LAWRENCE HIRSCHFELD (1999): «Culture, Cognition, and Evolution», en ROBERTWILSON y FRANK KEIL (eds.), MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, págs. 111-132.
• STONE, DEBORAH (2001): Policy Paradox: The art of Political Decision Making, New York, Norton.
• SUREL, YVES (2004): «Approches cognitives», en JACQUOT LAURIE BOUSSAGUET y PAULINE RAVINET (eds.), Dictionnaire des politiques publiques, París, Presses de Sciences Po, págs. 78-86.
• THAGARD, PAUL (2007): «Cognitive Science», en EDWARD N. ZALTA (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science>
• TRUE, JAMES, BRYAN B. JONES y FRANCK R. BAUMGARTNER (1999): «Punctuated Equilibrium Theory», en PAUL A. SABATIER, (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, Westview Press, págs. 97-115.
• WALLISER, BERNARD (2000): L'économie cognitive, París, Odile Jacob.
• WILDAVSKY, AARON (1987): «Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation», American Political Science Review, vol. 81, núm. 1, págs. 3-22.