La retribución y la evaluación del desempeño en empresas innovadoras españolas

  1. Camelo Ordaz, Carmen
  2. Fernández Alles, María de la Luz
  3. Valle, Ramón
Journal:
Economía industrial

ISSN: 0422-2784

Year of publication: 2010

Issue Title: Gobierno y transferencia del conocimiento: El reto de la innovación

Issue: 378

Pages: 169-178

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Economía industrial

Abstract

The objective of the paper is twofold. First, to carry out an exploratory analysis in order to establish if the firms that belong to two innovative industries In Spain develop compensation and evaluation practices based on the long term performance of individual and groups. Second, to analyse the incidence of these practices in the innovation performance of the firm. From the analysis carried out in a sample of 97 Spanish firms we conclude: first, there are two profiles of innovative firms; second, only the compensation based on the performance of the group affect directly and positively on the innovative performance of the firms.

Bibliographic References

  • BALKIN, D.B.; LOGAN, J.W. (1998). «Reward policies that support entrepreneurship». Compensation and Benefits Review, vol. 20, nº1, pp: 18-26.
  • BALKIN, D.; MARKMAN, G.D.; GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L.R. (2000). «Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation?» Academy of Management Journal, vol.43, nº6, pp: 1118-1129.
  • BANTEL, K.; JACKSON, S. (1989). «Top management innovation in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference?». Strategic Management Journal, vol. 10, special issue, pp: 107- 124.
  • BARCZAK, G.; WILEMON, D. (2003). «Team member experiences in new product development: views from the trenches». R&D Management, vol.33, nº5, pp: 463-479.
  • BONACHE, J. (2004). «La evaluación del rendimiento». En J. Bonache y A. Cabrera (Eds.) Dirección estratégica de personas. Evidencias y perspectivas para el siglo XXI. Madrid. Prentice Hall, pp: 164-190.
  • CAMELO, M.C.; FERNÁNDEZ, M.L.; FRENDE, M.A.; MARTÍNEZ, S. (2004). «Los resultados de innovación de la empresa: las características intrínsecas de los equipos de trabajo». Paper presentado al XIV Congreso de ACEDE, Murcia.
  • CHANG, T.J.; YEH, S.P.; YEH, I. (2007). «The effects of joint reward system in new product development». International Journal of Manpower, vol. 28, nº3/4, pp: 276-297.
  • CHENG, T.; MOHD, A. (2010). «Human Resource management Practices and Organizational Innovation: an empirical study in Malaysia». Journal of Applied Business Research, vol.26, nº4, pp: 105-115.
  • COOMBS, G.; GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L.R. (1991). «Cross-functional pay strategies in high-technology firms». Compensation and Benefits Review, Sep/Oct, vol. 23, nº 5, pp: 40-48.
  • COOMBS, R.; NARANDREN, P.; RICHARDS, A. (1996) A literaturebased innovation output indicator. Research Policy, vol. 25, pp: 403- 413.
  • CORDERO, R. (1989). The measurement of innovation performance in the firm: an overview. Research Policy, vol. 19, pp: 185- 192.
  • DAMANPOUR, F. (1996). «Innovation effectiveness, adoption and organizational performance». En: M.A. West & J.L. Farr (Eds.). Innovation and Creativity at Work, Wiley, pp: 125-141.
  • DELERY, J.; DOTY, H. (1996). «Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource Management: tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions». Academy of Management Journal, vol.39, nº4, pp: 802-835
  • DIAZ, M.D.; GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L.R. (1997). «The effectiveness of organization compensation strategies in technology intensive firms». Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol.8, nº2, pp: 301-317.
  • GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L.; EGATZ, A.; LARRAZA, M. (2004). «Gestión de recursos humanos e innovación». En J. Bonache; A. Cabrera (Eds.) Dirección estratégica de personas. Evidencias y perspectivas para el siglo XXI. Madrid. Prentice Hall, pp: 424-451.
  • GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L.; SAURA, D. (1996). «La remuneración basada en el desempeño para el caso de empresas de alta tecnología». Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, vol.5, nº3, pp: 181-196.
  • GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L.R.; BALKIN, D.B. (1992). «Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective». Academy of Management Journal, vol. 35, nº5, pp: 921-956.
  • GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L.R.; BALKIN, D.B.; CARDY, R.L. (2001). Dirección y gestión de recursos humanos. Prentice Hall.
  • GÓMEZ-MEJÍA, L.R.; WELBOURNE, T.M. (1988). «Compensation strategy: an overview and future steps». Human Resource Planning, vol. 11, nº 3, pp: 173-189.
  • JIMÉNEZ-JIMÉNEZ, J.; SÁNZ-VALLE, R. (2005). «Innovation and Human Resource Management fit : an empirical study» . International Journal of Manpower, vol.26, nº4, pp: 364-381.
  • KAHN, K.B., BARCZAK, G. and MOSS, R. (2006). «Perspective: Establishing and NPD best Practices». Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 23, pp: 106-16.
  • KIMBERLY, J.R. (1981) Managerial innovation. En: P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • LARRAZA, M. (2004). «La retribución». En J. Bonache y A. Cabrera (Eds.) Dirección estratégica de personas. Evidencias y perspectivas para el siglo XXI. Madrid. Prentice Hall, pp: 192-229.
  • LAURSEN, K.; FOSS, N.J. (2003). «New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance». Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 27, pp: 243- 263.
  • LEEDE, J.; LOOISE, J.K. (2005). Innovation and HRM: towards an integrated framework. Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 14, nº2, pp: 108-117.
  • LOVELACE, K., SHAPIRO, D.; WEINGART, L. (2001) Maximizing crossfunctional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: a conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 44, nº4, pp: 779-794.
  • MANUAL DE OSLO (1992). «The measurement of scientific and technological activities: proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data». OCDE.
  • MCADAM, R.; MCCLELLAND, J. (2002) Individual and teambased idea generation within innovation management: organizational and research agendas. European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 5, nº 2, pp: 86-98.
  • O´SULLIVAN, M.A. (2000), Contests For Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • SARIN, S.; MAHAJAN, V. (2001). «The effect of reward structures on the performance of cross-functional product development teams». Journal of Marketing, vol. 65, nº2, pp: 35-53.
  • SASTRE, M.A.; AGUILAR, E.M. (2003). Dirección de recursos humanos. Un enfoque estratégico. Mc Graw Hill.
  • SCHULER, R. (1986). «Fostering and Facilitating Entrepreneurship in Organizations: Implications for Organization Structure and Human Resource Management Practices». Human Resource Management, vol.25, nº4, pp: 607-629.
  • SCHULER, R.; JACKSON, S. (1987). «Linking competitive strategy with human resource management practices». Academy of Management Executive, vol.1, nº3, pp: 207-219.
  • SETHI, R.; SMITH, D. C.; PARK, C. (2002). «How to kill a team’s creativity». Harvard Business Review, vol. 80, nº8, pp: 73-86.
  • SHIPTON, H.; FAY, D.; WEST, M.; PATTERSON, M.; BIRDI, K. (2005). Managing people to promote innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 14, nº2, pp: 118-128.
  • TUSHMAN, T.; D. NADLER (1986). «Organizing for innovation». California Management Review, vol. 28, nº 3, pp: 74-92.
  • VALLE, R.J. (2004). La gestión estratégica de los recursos humanos. Pearson. Prentice Hall.
  • VALLE, S. (2002). «Factores de éxito en el desarrollo de nuevos productos en las empresas industriales españolas». Economía Industrial, nº 347, pp: 173-184.
  • WEST, M.A. (2002). «Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups». Applied Psychology, vol. 51, pp: 355–424.
  • WOLFE, R.A. (1994). «Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions». Journal of Management Studies, vol. 31, nº3, pp: 405-431.
  • ZAHRA, S.A., Neubaum, D.O.; Huse, M. (2000), «Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems», Journal of Management, vol. 26, nº 5, pp. 947-976.
  • ZARRAGA, C. y BONACHE, J. (2005). «The impact of team atmosphere on knowledge outcomes in self-managed teams». Organization Studies, 26, 661-681.
  • ZHOU, K. Z. (2006), «Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: the case of China», Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 35, nº 3, pp: 394-402.
  • ZINGHEIM, P.K.; SCHUSTER, J.R. (1995). «The team pay research study». Compensation and Benefits Review, Nov/Dec, vol. 27, nº6, pp: 6-9.
Data source: Dialnet