El impacto de las TIC en la transformación de la enseñanza universitariarepensar los modelos de enseñanza y aprendizaje

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: a new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? Educause Review, 41(2), 32-44.
• Anderson, P. & Blackwood, A. (2004). Mobile and PDA Technologies and their Future Use in Education. Bristol: Joint Information Systems Committee Technology and Standards Watch. Ver http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/ACF11B0.pdf. consultado el 15 de octubre de 2008.
• Area, M. (2005). Internet y la calidad de la educación superior en la perspectiva de la convergencia europea. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 63(230), 85-100.
• Armastas, C., Holt, D. y Rice, M. (2006). Balancing the possibilities for mobile technologies in higher education. Ver http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/04_Armatas.pdf. consultado el 17 de octubre de 2008.
• Attewel, J. (2005). Mobile Technologies and Learning: A technology Update and mlearning Project Summary. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency. Ver http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/pdf/041923RS.pdf. consultado el 19 de Nnoviembre de 2007.
• Bain, K. (2005). Lo que hacen los mejores profesores de universidad. Valencia: Publicacions de la Universitat de València.
• Baldwin-Evans, K. (2006). Key steps to implementing a successful blended learning strategy. Industrial and Commercial Training, 38(3), 156–163.
• Barnes, K., Marate, R. C. y Ferris, S.P. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate, Journal of Online Education, 3(4).
• Barone, C. (2001). Conditions for transformation: Infrastructure is not the issue, Educause Review, 36(3), 41-47.
• Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing Technological Change: Strategies for College and University Leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Bates, A. W. (2004). Why Universities Must Change. Keynote paper to the Open University of Hong Kong, 14 December. Ver http://www.tonybates.ca. consultado el 18 de octubre de 2008.
• Bates, A. W. (2004). La planificación para el uso de las TIC en la enseñanza. En A. Sangra y M. González Sanmame (Coord.), La transformación de las universidades: a través de las TIC: discursos y prácticas (pp. 31-52). Barcelona: Editorial UOC. Ver http://www.uoc.edu/dt/esp/sangra1104.pdf. consultado el 1 de noviembre de 2008.
• Benson, L. & Harkavy, I. (2002). Saving the soul of the university. En K. Robins y F. Webster (eds.), The Virtual University? (pp. 169-209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Breen, R., Lindsay R., Jenkins, A. & Smith, P. (2001). The role of information and communication technologies in a university learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 95-114.
• Bricall, J. (2000, marzo). Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades españolas (CRUE) Informe 2000. Barcelona. Ver http://www.oei.es/oeivirt/bricall.htm. consultado el 15 de enero de 2009.
• Bueno, C. y Gil, J. J. (coords.) (2007). Las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación en la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 21(1) monográfico, 17-144.
• Butler, D. & Winni, P. (1995). Feed back and selfregulated learning: A theoretical Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
• Byrne, M., Flood, B. & Willis, P. (2002). Approaches to learning of European business students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26, 19-28.
• Candy, P. (1998). Knowledge navigators and lifelong learners: producing graduates for the information society. En C. RUST (ed.), Improving student learning: improving students as learners. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
• Cebrián, M. (2003). Enseñanza virtual para la innovación universitaria. Madrid: Narcea Ediciones.
• Chan, S. & Lee, M. (2005). An Mp3 a day keeps the worries away: exploring the use of podcasting to address preconceptions and alleviate pre-class anxiety amongst undergraduate information technology students. Charles Sturt Student Experience Conference. Ver http://www.csu.edu.au/division/studserv/sec/papers/chan.pdf. consultado el 18 de mayo de 2007.
• Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.
• Corlett, D., Sharples, M., Bull, S. & Chan, T. (2005). Evaluation of a mobile learning organiser for university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 162- 170.
• Cradler, J., Mcnabb, M., Freeman, M. & Burchett, R. (2002). How does technology influence student learning? Learning and Leading with Technology, 29, 46-49.
• Cranston, N. (1998). Preparing teacher for the New Millennium: are we doing enough? Journal of InService Education, 24(3), 381-391.
• Cuban, L. (2008). Frogs into Princes: Writings on School Reform. New York: Columbia University Teachers College Press.
• Draper, S. & Brown, M. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81-94.
• Duart, J. y Lupíanez, F. (2005). Estrategias en la introducción y el uso de las TIC en la universidad. Revista Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 2(1). Ver http://www.uoc.educ/rusc. consultado el 1 de septiembre de 2009.
• Ehrmann, S. C. (1995). Asking the Right Questions: What Does Research Tell Us about Technology and Higher Learning? Change, 27(2), 20-27.
• Eriksen, T. H. (2001). Tyranny of the Moment: Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing firstand second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
• Escudero, J. M. (2006). EEES. ¿Será la hora de la renovación pedagógica de la Universidad? Murcia: ICE.
• Finley, L. y Hartman, D. (2004). Institutional change and resistance: Teacher preparatory faculty and technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12, 319-337.
• García-Valcárcel, A. (2003). Tecnología educativa. Implicaciones educativas del desarrollo tecnológico. Madrid: La Muralla.
• Geddes, S. (2004). M-learning in the C21st: Benefits for Learners. Ver http://knowledgetree.flexiblelearning.net.au/edition06/html/pra_simon_geddes.htm. consultado el 9 de noviembre de 2006.
• Hall, M. & Elliott, K. M. (2003). Diffusion of technology into the teaching process: strategies to encourage faculty members to embrace the laptop environment. Journal of Education for Business, 78, 301-307.
• Hanna, D. (Ed.). (2002). La enseñanza universitaria en la era digital. ¿Es ésta la universidad que queremos? Madrid: Octaedro-EUB.
• Harvey, L. y Knight, P. T. (1996). Transforming higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
• Hedberg, J. G. (2006). E-learning futures? Speculations for a time yet to come. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 171-183.
• Jarvis, P. (2008). The Routledge internacional handbook of Life Long Learning. Florence, KY: Routledge.
• Joint Information System Committee (2007). Student expectations study: Key findings from online research and discussion evenings held in June 2007 for the Joint Information Systems Committee. London: Author. Ver http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/publications/studentexpectations.aspx. consultado el 25 de marzo de 2008.
• Jochems, W., Van Merriënboer, J. & Koper, R. (Eds.) (2004). Integrated e-learning: Pedagogy, technology, and organization. London: Routledge Falmer.
• Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Marra, R.M. & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful Learning with Technology (3.ª edición). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson.
• Katz, R., Blustain, H., Duderstad, J., Farrintong, G., Goldstain, E., Graves, W. & Lozier, G. (1999). Dancing with the devil: Information technology and the new competition higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Keller, C. & Cernerud, L. (2002). Students’ perceptions of E-learning in university education. Journal of Educational Media, 27(1-2), 55-67.
• Kellerd, C. (2005). Virtual learning environments. Learning, Media and Technology, 30, 299-311.
• Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bernett, S. et al. (2007). The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. Paper presented at the ASCILITE Conference ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning, Singapore.
• Kerr, S. T. (2005). Why we all want it to work: Towards a culturally based model for technology and educational change. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 1005-1016.
• Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7-20.
• Kulik, C. C. y Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of Computer-Based Instruction: An Updated Analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, VII(1-2), 75-94.
• Laird, T. F. N. & Kuh, G. D. (2005). Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement Research in Higher Education, 46, 211-233.
• Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching, a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge Falmer.
• Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M. & Morrison, G. M. (2003). When each one has one: the influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Education Technological Research and Development, 51, 23-44.
• McManus, T. (1998). Delivering Instruction on the World Wide Web. Ver http://www.utexas.edu/its/unixweb/project.php. consultado el 25 de noviembre de 2004.
• McVay, G., Kimberlee, J., Snyder, D. & Graetz, K. A. (2005). Evolution of a laptop university: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 513-524.
• Marriott, N., Marriott, P. & Selwyn, N. (2004). Accounting undergraduates’ changing use of ICT and their views on using the internet in higher education. Accounting Education, 13, 117-130.
• Martínez, J. (2004). El papel del tutor en el aprendizaje virtual. Barcelona: Editorial UOC. Ver http://www.uoc.edu/dt/20383/index.html. consultado el 17 de enero de 2009.
• Martínez Martín, M. (2008). Reflexiones sobre aprendizaje y docencia en el actual contexto universitario. La promoción de equipos docentes. Revista de Educación, número extraordinario, 213-234.
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) (2006). MITOPENCOURSEWARE. Ver http://ocw.mit.edu/index.html. consultado el 7 de noviembre de 2006.
• Michavila, F. (Coord.) (2006). Propuestas para la renovación de las metodologías educativas en la universidad. Madrid: Consejo de Coordinación Universitaria Cátedra.
• Milliron, M. D. & Miles, C. L. (1999). Aha! The Internet changes nothing. Spring 1999 Advertising Supplement on Technology in Education. Community College Week, 11(18), 3, 8,15.
• Mishra, P. y Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
• Moule, P. (2003). ICT. A social justice approach to exploring user issues? Nurse Education Today, 23, 530-536.
• Morris, P., Ehrmann, S. C., Goldsmith, R., Howat, K. & Kumar, V. (1994). Valuable, Viable Software in Education: Cases and Analysis. New York: Primis Division of McGraw-Hill.
• Oliver, M. (2003). Looking backwards, looking forwards: an overview, some conclusions and an agenda. En J. Seale (Ed.), Learning technology in transition, from individual enthusiast to institutional implementation. Lisse-Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
• Oliver, M. & Dempster, J. (2003). Strategic staff development for embedding e-learning practices in higher education, en R. P. Blackwell Blackmore (eds.), Towards Strategic Staff Development? Buckingham: SHRE/Open University Press.
• Oliver, R. (2006). Exploring a technology-facilitated solution to cater for advanced students in large undergraduate classes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 1- 12.
• Online Computer Library Center and De Rosa, C. (2006). College Students’ Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: A Report to the OCLC Membership. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC. Ver http://www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.htm, consultado el 17 de enero de 2008.
• Organización de Cooperación y Desarrollo Económico (OCDE) (2005). E-learning in Tertiary Education: Where Do We Stand? Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
• Owen, P. S. & Demb, A. (2004). Change dynamics and leadership in technology implementation. Journal of Higher Education, 75, 636-666.
• Paredes, J. y Estebanell, M. (2005). Actitudes y necesidades de formación de los profesores ante las TIC y la introducción del crédito europeo: un nuevo desafío para la educación superior, Revista de educación, 337, 125-148.
• Pedro, F. (2001). Transforming On-campus Education: promise and peril of information technology in traditional universities. European Journal of Education 36(2), 175- 187.
• Price, L. & Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Why is it difficult to improve student learning? en C. Rust (Ed.), 11th Improving Student Learning Symposium, Improving Student Learning: theory, research and scholarship. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
• Reffel, P. & Whitworth, A. (2002). Information fluency. New Library World, 103, 427- 435.
• Richardson, J. T. E. (2000). Researching student learning: approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Robins, K. & Webster, F. (2002): The Virtual University? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Rodríguez Izquierdo, R. M.ª (2003). Reaprender a enseñar: Una experiencia de formación para la mejora continua de la docencia universitaria. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 17(2), 79-84.
• Rodríguez Izquierdo, R. M.ª (2005). ¿Cambiará Internet los sistemas de enseñanza y aprendizaje? Desafíos y posibilidades. Revista Innovación Educativa; 15, 213-221.
• Russel, T. (1997). The no significant difference phenomenon., Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. Ver http://www.nosignificantdifference.org/. consultado el 14 de enero de 2009.
• Salinas, J. (1998). Redes y desarrollo profesional del docente: entre el dato serendipity y el foro de trabajo colaborativo. Profesorado, 2(1). Universidad de Granada. Ver http://www.uib.es/depart/gte/docente.html. consultado el 31 de septiembre de 2009.
• Salinas, J. (2004). Innovación docente y uso de las TIC en la enseñanza universitaria. Revista Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 1(1). Ver http://www.uoc.edu/rusc/dt/esp/salinas1104.pdf consultado el 7 de enero de 2009.
• Sangrá, A. y González Sanmamed, M. (Coord.). La transformación de las universidades: a través de las TIC: discursos y prácticas. Barcelona: Editorial UOC. Ver http://www.uoc.edu/dt/esp/sangra1104.pdf. consultado el 1 de noviembre de 2008.
• Schlager, M. & Fusco, J. (2003). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: are we putting the cart before the horse? The Information Society, 19, 203-220.
• Schmidtlein, F. A. & Taylor, A. L. (2000). Identifying costs of instructional technology in higher education, Tertiary Education and Management, 6(4), 289-304.
• Seale, J. (Ed.) (2003). Enthusiastic implementation: setting the scene for evolution and revolution. En J. Seale (Ed.), Learning technology in transition, from individual enthusiast to institutional implementation. Lisse-Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
• Selwyn, N., Marriott, N. & Marriott, P. (2000). Net gains or net pains? Business students’ use of the Internet. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(2), 166-186.
• Selwyn, N. (2003). Why students do (and do not) make use of ICT in university. Paper presented at the Finding Common Ground: IT Education, Dearing and Democracy in the Information Society conference, Leeds University.
• Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 83-94.
• Sevillano, M. L. (2005): Herramientas virtuales y su conocimiento. Enseñanza, 23, 387-402.
• Sherman, T. & Kurshan, B. (2005). Constructing learning: using technology to support teaching for understanding. Learning and Leading with Technology, 3(5), 10-39.
• Tomás, M., Feixas, M. y Marqués, P. (1999): La universidad ante los retos que plantea la sociedad de la información. El papel de las TIC, Edutec’99. Nuevas tecnologías en la formación flexible y a distancia, 14-17. Universidad de Sevilla. Ver http://tecnologiaedu.us.es/edutec/paginas/117.html. consultado el 4 de enero de 2010.
• Twigg, C. A. (1999). Improving learning & reducing costs: Redesigning largeenrollment courses. National Centre for Academic Transformation. Ver http://thencat.org/Monographs/mono1.pdf. consultado el 7 de enero de 2006.
• UNESCO/BIE (1996). Communities and the Information Society: the Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Education. Genova.
• University of Leicester (2005). Why use learning technology? Ver http://www.le.ac.uk/talent/elearning/why.html. consultado el 8 de noviembre de 2006.
• Vuorikari, R. (2004). Virtual Learning Environments for European Schools. Ver http://insight.eun.org/ww/en/pub/insight/misc/specialreports/vle.htm. consultado el 23 de octubre de 2008.
• Westbrook, V. (2006). The virtual learning future Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 471-482.
• Wiske, M. S., Rennebohm Franz, K. & Breit, L. (2005). Teaching for Understanding with Technology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.