Die politische verpflichtunggründe um unabhängig vom willen zu handeln
ISSN: 1578-6730
Year of publication: 2011
Issue: 30
Pages: 249-260
Type: Article
More publications in: Nómadas: Critical Journal of Social and Juridical Sciences
Abstract
This article analyzes Searle�s thesis according to which all political power represents a deontic power related to rights, duties, obligations, authorizations, permissions, authority, etc. This conception leads to understand to us the power and the constituent functions of status irremediably tie to the collective acceptance and constitutive rules. Notions like linguistic constitution of deontic powers, the reasons to act independently of desire, the normative rationality and the collective acceptance of the political systems, constitute some of angular stones of a conceptual frame whose social, institutional and politic realistic vision have important implications in the scope of the legal, political and moral philosophy.
Bibliographic References
- (2001) ALARCÓN, Carlos, Causalidad y normatividad, Sevilla: MAD ARTOSI, Alberto “On the Notion of an Empowered Agent” en www.cirfid.unibo.it/~agsw/lea02/pp/Artosi.pdf
- (2004) ARTOSI, Alberto, ROTOLO, Antonino, y VIDA, Silvia “On the logical Nature of Count-as Conditionals”, en CERVENINI, C. (ed.), Proceedings of LEA. Bologna: Gedit pp. 9-34.
- (2001) BEJARANO, Teresa, “Acerca de las razones para actuar de Searle”, en Thémata. Revista de Filosofía, nº 26, pp. 259-273
- (2003) DI LUCIA, Paolo, Ontologia sociale. Potere deontico e regole costitutive. Macerata: Quodlibert, .
- (2002) LIZ GUTIERREZ, Manuel, “Forma y contenido en las razones para actuar independientemente del deseo” en Revista Laguna, vol. 10,
- (2006) MILLER, Seumas “Artefacts and Colletive Intentionality” en Techné, Vol. 9 (2) Winter, pp.52-67;
- (2002) NOGUERA FERRER, José Antonio, “Racionalidad y normas sociales en la teoría post-analítica de la acción” en www.selene.uab.es/_cs_gr_saps/catala/autors/xxnoguera.htm
- (2003) OPPENHEIM, Felix, E. “Potere Bruto e potere deontico Una risposta a Searle” en DI LUCIA, Paolo, 2003, Ontologia sociale. Potere deontico e regole costitutive. Macerata: Quodlibert,
- (2003) RODRIGUEZ GONZÁLEZ, Mariano, “Esa fuerza tan especial del compromiso” en LOGOS. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, nº 36, pp. 283- 288
- (2003) SCHMITT, F. F. (ed.), Socializing Metaphysics: The nature of social reality, Lanham, MD: Rowlan and Littlefield.
- (2003) SEARLE, John R. “Ontologia sociale e potere político” en DI LUCIA, Paolo, Ontologia sociale. Potere deontico e regole costitutive. Macerata: Quodlibert,
- (2004) SEARLE, John R. Libertad y neurobiología. Reflexiones sobre el libre albedrío, el lenguaje y el poder político, Barcelona: Paidos
- (1997) SEARLE, John R. La construcción de la realidad social, Barcelona: Paidos
- (2006) SEARLE, John R. “Social Ontology: Some Basic Principles” en Anthropological Theory, Vol. 6 (1)
- (2005) SEARLE, John R. “What is an Institution? en Journal of Institutional Economics, Volume 1, Issue 01, January, pp. 1-22
- (2000) SEARLE, John R., Razones para actuar. Una teoría del libre albedrío, Oviedo: Ediciones Novel
- (2001) SEARLE, John, R. “Neither phenomenological description nor rational reconstruction: Replay to Dreyfus” en Revue Internationale de Philosophie, nº 217.