Enhancing emotion-based learning in decision-making under uncertainty

  1. David Alarcón 1
  2. Josué Amián 1
  3. José Sánchez Medina 1
  1. 1 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Ano de publicación: 2015

Volume: 27

Número: 4

Páxinas: 368-373

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Psicothema

Resumo

Background: The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is widely used to study decision-making differences between several clinical and healthy populations. Unlike the healthy participants, clinical participants have difficulty choosing between advantageous options, which yield long-term benefits, and disadvantageous options, which give high immediate rewards but lead tonegative profits. However, recent studies have found that healthy participants avoid the options with a higher frequency of losses regardless of whether or not they are profitable in the long run. The aim of this study was to control for the confounding effect of the frequency of losses between options to improve the performance of healthy participants on the IGT. Method: Eighty healthy participants were randomly assigned to the original IGT or a modified version of the IGT that diminished the gap in the frequency of losses between options. Results: The participants who used the modified IGT version learned to make better decisions based on long-term profit, as indicated by an earlier ability to discriminate good from bad options, and took less time to make their choices. Conclusions: This research represents an advance in the study of decision making under uncertainty by showing that emotion-based learning is improved by controlling for the loss-frequency bias effect.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.
  • Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293-1295.
  • Bowman, C. H. & Turnbull, O. H. (2004). Emotion-based learning on a simplified card game: The Iowa and Bangor Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 55, 277-282.
  • Buelow, M. T. & Suhr, J. A. (2013). Personality characteristics and state mood infl uence individual deck selections on the Iowa Gambling Task. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 593-597.
  • Cella, M., Dymond, S., Cooper, A., & Turnbull, O. (2007). Effects of decision-phase time constraints on emotion-based learning in the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 64, 164-169.
  • Chiu, Y. C. & Lin, C. H. (2007). Is deck C an advantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task? Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3, 37.
  • Chiu, Y. C., Lin, C. H., Huang, J. T., Lin, S., Lee, P. L., & Hsieh, J. C. (2008). Immediate gain is long-term loss: Are there foresighted decision makers in the Iowa Gambling Task? Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4, 13.
  • Evans, C. E. Y., Bowman, C. H., & Turnbull, O. H. (2005). Subjective awareness on the Iowa Gambling Task: The key role of emotional experience in schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 656-664.
  • Horstmann, A., Villringer, A., & Neumann, J. (2012). Iowa Gambling Task: there is more to consider than long-term outcome. Using a linear equation model to disentangle the impact of outcome and frequency of gains and losses. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 61.
  • Huizenga, H. M., Crone, E. A., & Jansen, B. J. (2007). Decision-making in healthy children, adolescents and adults explained by the use of increasingly complex proportional reasoning rules. Developmental Science, 10, 814-825.
  • Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, third ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Labudda, K., Frigge, K., Horstmann, S., Aengenendt, J., Woermann, F. G., Ebner, A., Markowitsch, H.J., & Brand, M. (2009). Decision making in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychologia, 47, 50-58.
  • Lin, C. H., Chiu, Y. C., & Huang, J. T. (2009). Gain-loss frequency and final outcome in the Soochow Gambling Task? Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5, 45.
  • Lin, C. H., Chiu, Y. C., Lee, P. L., & Hsieh, J. C. (2007). Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task? Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3, 16.
  • Lin, C. H., Song, T. J., Chen, Y. Y., Lee, W. K., & Chiu, Y. C. (2013). Reexamining the validity and reliability of the clinical version of the Iowa gambling task: Evidence from a normal subject group. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 220.
  • Mimura, M., Oeda, R., & Kawamura, M. (2006). Impaired decisionmaking in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 12, 169-175.
  • Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., Horstmann, A., Neumann, J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2013). Performance of healthy participants on the Iowa Gambling Task. Psychological Assessment, 25, 180-193.