Cooperative Assessment for Learning in CLIL Contexts

Referencias bibliográficas

• Barbero, T. (2012). Assessment tools and practices in CLIL. In F. Quatarpelle (Ed.), Assessment and evaluation in CLIL (pp. 38-56). European Commission: AECLIL-EACEA. Retrieved from http://www.alsdgc.ro/userfi les/2827-10627 -1-PB.pdf
• Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2012). Técnicas de aprendizaje colaborativo. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
• Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347-364.
• Black, P., & William, D. (2010). Inside the Black Box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81-90.
• Casal, S. (2008). Cooperative learning in CLIL contexts: Ways to improve students’ competences in the foreign language classroom. IAIE Conference: Cooperative Learning in Multicultural Societies: Critical refl ections, Turin, Italy. Retrieved July 25, 2015 from https://soniacasal.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/cooperativelearning-in-clil-contexts-ways-to-improve-students-competences-in-theforeign-language-classroom/
• Casal Madinabeitia, S. (2014). Aprendizaje cooperativo: Siete principios básicos para un aprendizaje óptimo entre estudiantes. Magazin / Extra, 1, 16-21. Retrieved July 27, 2015 from http://www.fage.es/magazin_extra/magazin_e_1/]
• Coyle, D. (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning. Motivating learners and teachers. The Scottish Language Review, 13, 1-8. Retrieved July 23, 2015 from http://www.scilt.org.uk/Library/ScottishLanguagesReview/Scottish LanguagesReviewBackIssues/Issue1301052006/tabid/2839/Default.aspx#d. en.198973
• Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 543-562.
• Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL Content and Language Integrated Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Escobar, C., & Sánchez, A. (2009). Language learning through tasks in a CLIL Science classroom. Porta Linguarum, 11, 65-83.
• Ghaith, G. (2004). Correlates of the implementation of the STAD Cooperative Learning method in the English as a foreign language classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(4), 279-294.
• Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 197-213.
• Hijzen, D., Boekaerts, M., & Vedder, P. (2007). Exploring the links between student’s engagement in cooperative learning, their goal preferences and appraisals of instructional conditions in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 17, 673-687.
• Hargreaves, E. (2007). The validity of collaborative assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 185-199.
• Horrillo Godino, Z. (2011). ¿Realizan los alumnos las tareas de intercambio oral de información en el aula AICLE? Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 4(2), 71-95.
• Hönig, I. (2009). Assessment in CLIL. A case study. (Diplomarbeit). University of Vienna: Vienna. Retrieved from http://othes.univie.ac.at/7976/
• Iborra Cuéllar, A., & Izquierdo Alonso, M. (2010). ¿Cómo afrontar la evaluación del aprendizaje colaborativo? Una propuesta valorando el proceso, el contenido y el producto de la actividad grupal. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 20, 221-241.
• Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1994). Hacia un aula equitativa. Aprendizaje cooperativo en la educación intercultural de Europa. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Jonnsson A., & Svingby. G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130-144.
• López Rúa, P. (2015). Posibilidades y limitaciones del aprendizaje cooperativo en el EEES: análisis de una experiencia en el aula de inglés. Porta Linguarum, 24, 163-177.
• Maggi, F. (2012). Evaluation in CLIL. In F. Quatarpelle, F. (Ed.), Assessment and evaluation in CLIL. European Commission: AECLIL-EACEA. Retrieved from http://www.aeclil.net
• Marsh, D., Pavón Vázquez, V., & Frigols Martín, M. J. (2013). The higher education Languages landscape: Ensuring quality in English language degree programmes. Valencia: Valencian International University.
• Mehisto, P. (2012). Criteria for producing CLIL lerning material. Encuentro, 21, 15-33.
• Meyer, O. (2010). Towards quality CLIL: Successful planning and teaching strategies. Pulso, 33, 11-29.
• Murillo, F. J., Martínez-Garrido, C., & Hidalgo Farran, N. (2014). Incidencia de la forma de evaluar los docentes de Educación Primaria en el rendimiento de los estudiantes en España. Estudios sobre Educación, 27, 91-113.
• Panadero E., & Jonsson A. (2013) The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144.
• Poehner, M. E., & Van Compernolle, R. A. (2011). Frames of interaction in dynamic assessment: Developmental diagnosis of second language learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(2), 183-198.
• Price, M., O’Donovan, B., & Rust, C. (2007). Putting a social-constructivist assessment model into practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 143-152.
• Quartapelle, F. (Ed.) (2012). Assessment and evaluation in CLIL. European Commission: AECLIL-EACEA. Retrieved from http://www.aeclil.net
• Quartapelle, F., & Schameitat, B. (2012). Teaching and learning with CLIL. In F. Quatarpelle (Ed.), Assessment and evaluation in CLIL. European Commission: AECLIL-EACEA. Retrieved from http://www.aeclil.net
• Rezaei, A. R., & Lovorn, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assessing Writing, 15, 18-39.
• Rich, Y. (1990). Ideological impediments to instructional innovation: The case of cooperative learning. Teaching & Teacher Education, 6(1), 81-91.
• Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive and individualistic goal structure. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223246.
• Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: how the research literature shows us this could be the best practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 231-240.
• Strom, P. S., & Strom, R. D. (2011). Teamwork skills assessment for cooperative learning. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17(4), 233-251.
• Suárez, M. L. (2005). Claves para el éxito del Aprendizaje Integrado de Contenidos y Lengua Extranjera (AICLE). Quinta Jornada sobre Aprendizaje Cooperativo GIAC. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto y Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Retrieved July 25, 2015 from http://giac.upc.es/PAG/GIAC_CAS/GIAC_ JAC/05/JAC05-MLS.htm
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180.
• Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21-39.
• Webb, N. M. (1995). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Weurlander, M., Söderberg, M., Scheja, M., Hult, H., & Wernerson, A. (2012). Exploring formative assessment as a tool for learning: Students’ experiences of different methods of formative assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 747-760.