Impact of the internal training load over recovery-stress balance in endurance runners

  1. Hernández-Cruz, Germán 1
  2. López-Walle, Jeanette Magnolia 1
  3. Quezada-Chacón, José Trinidad 1
  4. Jaenes Sánchez, José Carlos 2
  5. Rangel-Colmenero, Blanca Rocío 3
  6. Reynoso-Sánchez, Luis Felipe 1
  1. 1 Autonomous University of Nuevo León, Faculty of Sports Organization
  2. 2 Pablo de Olavide University and Andalusian Center of Sport Medicine
  3. 3 Facultad de Organización Deportiva, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Montrer des affiliations +
Revue:
Revista de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1132-239X,  1988-5636

Année de publication: 2017

Titre de la publication: Congreso Mundial de Psicología del deporte (Parte II)

Volumen: 26

Número: 4

Pages: 57-62

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de psicología del deporte

Résumé

The aim of the research was to analyze the response in the recovery-stress balance perception and the internal training load in resistance runners. 18 trained runners (age: 20.1±2.7 years, weight: 64.2±7.63kg, height, 174.32±6.2cm, VO2max: 57.54±7.34L), participate in tests of 800m (five), 1500m (four), 3000m steeplechase (one), 5000m (five), 10,000m (one) and 21km (two). Three weeks of training monitoring was performed, in which two were of moderate load and one of intense load. The daily S-RPE (Foster et al., 2001) and weekly RESTQ-Sport were applied to evaluate the perception of training load and recovery-stress balance. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test was performed. A variance analysis was applied through the Friedman test, with post hoc Wilcoxon. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the RESTQ-Sport scales and the weekly S-RPE was analyzed. The results indicate that the S-RPE presented significant variations between the weeks, with week three reflecting the greater internal training load perceived. With respect to RESTQ-Sport, only the scale Disturbed Breaks (DB) shown significant differences, being this a specific scale of the sport, reflecting an increase in the perception of stress by the intensity of the training. There were no significant correlations, however, the S-RPE and the Disturbed breaks scale increased in week 3. The results coincide with other previous investigations in which the relationship between the increase in the training loads and the perception of this by the athletes.

€ Voir financement

Information sur le financement

This study was supported by PRODEP DSA/103.15/15/6797

Financeurs

  • PRODEP
    • DSA/103.15/15/6797

Références bibliographiques

  • Borresen, J. and Lambert, M. (2009). The quantification of training load, the training response and the effect of performance. Sports Medicine, 39(9), 779-795.
  • Brink, M., Nederhof, E., Visscher, C., Schmikli, S. and Lemmink, k. (2010). Monitoring, load, recovery and performance in young elite soccer players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(3), 597-603.
  • Di Fronso, S., Nakamura, F., Bortoli, L., Robazza, C. and Bertollo, M. (2013). Stress and recovery balance in amateur basketball players: Differences by gender and preparation phase. International Journal of Sport Physiology and Performance, 8(6), 618-622.
  • Fletcher, D., Hanton, S., Mellalieu, S. D. and Neil, R. (2012). A conceptual framework of organizational stressors in sports performers. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 22(4), 545-557.
  • Foster, C., Florhaug, J., Franklin, J., Gottchall, L., Hrovatin, L., Parker, Z.,…Dodge, C. (2001). A new approach to monitoring exercise training. Journal of Strength and Coditioning Research, 15(1), 109-115.
  • Freitas, V., Nakamura, F., Miloski, B., Samulski, D. and Bara-Filho, M. (2014). Sensitivity of physiological and psychological markers to training load intensification in volleyball players. Journal of Sport Science and Medicine, 13(3), 571-579.
  • Halson, S. (2014). Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Medicine, 44(2), 139-147.
  • Kellmann, M. (2010). Preventing overtraining in athletes in high-intensity sports and stress/recovery monitoring. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 20(2), 95-102.
  • Kellmann, M. and Kallus, K. W. (2016). The Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes. En K. W. Kallus, M. and Kellmann (Eds.), The Recovery-Stress Questionnaires: User Manual (pp. 86–131). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Pearson Assessment & Information GmbH.
  • Laux, P., Krumm, B., Diers, M. and Flor, H. (2015). Recovery-stress balance and injury risk in professional football players: a prospective study. Journal of Sports Science, 33(20), 2140-2148.
  • Manzi, V., Iellamo, F., Impellizzeri, F., D’Ottavio, S. and Castagna, C. (2009). Relation between individualized training impulses and performance in distance runners. Medicine & Science in Sports & Excersice, 41(11), 2090-2096.
  • Reynoso-Sánchez, L. F., Hernández-cruz, G., López-walle, J., Rangel-colmenero, B., Quezada-Chacón, J. T. y Jaenes, J. C. (2016). Balance de estrés-recuperación en jugadores universitarios de voleibol durante una temporada. Retos, 30, 193–197.
  • Saw, A., Main, L. and Gastin, P. (2016). Monitoring the athlete training response: Subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: A systematic review. British Jorunal of Sport Medicine, 50(5), 281-291.
  • Wallace, L., Slattery, K. and Coutts, A. (2009). The ecological validity and application of the session-RPE method for quantifying training load in swimmers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23(1), 33-38.
  • Wallace, L., Slattery, K. and Coutts, A. (2014). A comparison of methods for quantifying training load: Relationships between modelled and actual training responses. European Jorunal of Applied Physiology, 114(1), 11-20.
La source de données: Dialnet