FleN and FlhF as new regulatory elements in the lifestyle switch in Pseudomonas putida

  1. Blanca Navarrete
  2. Laura Serrano
  3. Antonio Leal
  4. Aroa López-Sánchez
  5. Fernando Govantes
Revista:
Biosaia: Revista de los másteres de Biotecnología Sanitaria y Biotecnología Ambiental, Industrial y Alimentaria

ISSN: 2254-3821

Año de publicación: 2016

Número: 5

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Biosaia: Revista de los másteres de Biotecnología Sanitaria y Biotecnología Ambiental, Industrial y Alimentaria

Resumen

Motivation:Pseudomonas putida is a soil bacterium that can be found in nature as individual motile cells or as part of sessile communities called biofilms (1). Biofilm formation could be considered an adaptive strategy as it provide higher resistance against adverse agents, antimicrobial treatments, ultraviolet radiation or dehydration, increasing bacteria survival (2). The switch from a planktonic lifestyle to biofilm formation in P.putida is regulated by FleQ and the intracellular levels of c-di-GMP (3). Isolation of insertion mutants in flhF gene, defective in biofilm formation, suggests the involvement of additional elements in the regulation of this process. In this work, we have characterized the transcriptional organization of flhA, flhF, fleN and fliA genes and the role of FlhF and FleN in biofilm development in P.putida. Methods: Planktonic growth and biofilm formation curves, adhesion and swimming-motility assays. Gene expression analysis: β-galactosidase assays and RT-PCR. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). Results and Conclusions: To test the role of FlhF and FleN in biofilm development, we carried out a phenotypic characterization of ΔflhF and ΔfleN mutants. Experiments shown that ΔfleN mutant is not able to form biofilm whereas ΔflhF mutant exhibits a wild-type phenotype. Adhesion assays indicate that ΔfleN mutant has a reduced adhesion, whereas ΔflhF can properly adhere to the surface. On the other hand, both mutant show reduced swimming motility. These resuts suggests that both, FleN and FlhF, are involved in swimming motility, but only FleN is necessary for biofilm formation, probably by altering adhesion capacity of the bacteria. Bioinformatic tools predict that flhF and fleN form an operon with the upstream gene flhA and the downstream gene fliA. In order to corroborate this hypothesis, we have done RT-PCR using RNA from the mutants. Results shown that these genes are structured in a single operon: flhAFfleNfliA. To determine a possible regulatory role of these elements in biofilm formation and motility, β-galactosidase assays were performed to analyse the expression of biofilm and flagellum related promoters. Results shown that FleN downregulates both types of promoters whereas FlhF is only involved in the regulation of one flagellar gene. The regulatory role of FleN has been further studied in vitro by EMSA with the regulator FleQ. Results suggest that FleN is required for FleQ to bind to its target promoters.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Costerton, J.W., Lewandowski, Z., Caldwell, D.E., Korber, D.R., and Lappin-Scott, H.M. (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49: 711–745
  • Jefferson KK. What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? (2004) FEMS Microbiol Lett.;236(2):163-173.
  • Jiménez-Fernández, A., López-Sánchez, A., Jiménez-Díaz, L, Calero,P.;Navarrete, B., Platero, A.I., and Govantes, F. Complex interplay between FleQ, c-di-GMP and multiple σfactors coordinately regulates flagellar motility and biofilm development in Pseudomonas putida(2016) PLos One (under review)