La crítica al positivismo legalista y al imperativismo normativo y el derecho indígena zapatista
- 1 Universidad Pablo de Olavide (España)
ISSN: 1575-7382
Datum der Publikation: 2013
Nummer: 16
Seiten: 135-158
Art: Artikel
Andere Publikationen in: Revista telemática de filosofía del derecho ( RTFD )
Zusammenfassung
The critics of legalistic positivism in the transition from the nineteenth to the twentieth centuries —Gény, Ehrlich, Kantorowicz— were opposed to a plural conception of the law to the law as the only formal source and the state as a only material source of law. Later, in mid-twentieth century, the critics of imperativism —Hart, Bobbio— defended a plurality of legal rules against the imperativists who considered the rules ordering conduct to be the only rules of law. The similarity between these critics and indigenous law in general —and indigenous zapatista law in particular— is amazing as much in respect to the defense of a plurality of rules as to their origin and historical developmen