Propiedades Psicométricas de la Adaptación al Español de la Participant Role Approach (PRA)

  1. Alcántar Nieblas, Carolina
  2. Valdés Cuervo, Angel Alberto
  3. Carlos Martínez, Ernesto Alonso
  4. Martínez Ferrer, Belén
  5. García Vazquez, Fernanda Inez
Revista:
Revista Colombiana de Psicología

ISSN: 0121-5469

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 27

Número: 2

Páginas: 177-192

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15446/RCP.V27N2.68721 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Colombiana de Psicología

Resumen

El estudio se propuso analizar las propiedades psicométricas del Participant Role Appoach (PRA) para medir roles de espectadores en el acoso escolar en niños mexicanos. Participaron Participaron 787 estudiantes, 415 (52.7 %) niños (M edad = 10.59, DE = .66 años) y 372 (47.3 %) niñas (M edad = 10.51, DE = .64 años). Los resultados del análisis factorial confirmatorio sugieren que el modelo de tres roles (pro-acoso, pro-social y no comprometido) se ajusta mejor que el de cuatro roles (alentador, asistente, defensor y no comprometido). La PRA presenta invariancia de medición en ambos sexos, y evidencias de validez concurrente. Se concluyó que la escala posee propiedades psicométricas adecuadas para la medición de roles de espectadores.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2011). Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410396746
  • Belacchi, C., & Farina, E. (2010). Prosocial/Hostile roles and emotion comprehension in preschooler. Aggressive Behaviour, 36, 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20361
  • Blunch, N. J. (2013). Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling Using ibm spss Statistic and amos (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Estados Unidos: sage.
  • Byrne, B. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with amos (2nd ed.).Nueva York, EstadosUnidos: Routledge.
  • Cappadocia, M. C., Pepler, D., Cummings, J. G., & Craig, W. (2012). Individual motivations and characteristics associated with bystander intervention during bullying episodies among children and youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27, 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573512450567
  • Chen, L. M, & Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). Prevalence of school bullying among secondary students in Taiwan: Measurements with and without a specific definition of bullying. School Psychology International, 34, 707-720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313479694
  • Craig, W., Harel-Fisch, Y., Fogel-Grinvald, H., Dostaler, S., Hetland, J., Simons-Morton, B., & Molcho, M. (2009). A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescent in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-5413-9
  • Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (1998). Observations of bullying and victimization in the schoolyard. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 13, 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034300211002
  • Demaray, M. K., Summers, K. H., Jenkins, L. N., & Becker, L. D. (2016). Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (bpbq): Establishing a reliable and valid measure. Journal of School Violence, 15, 158-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.964801
  • Doramajian, C., & Bukowski, W. M. (2015). A longitudinal study of the associations between moral disengagement and active defending versus passive bystanding during bullying situations. Merril-Palmer Quartely, 61, 144-172. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.61.1.0144
  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alfa to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problema of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.2046
  • Espegale, D. L., Hong, J. S, Rao, M. A., & Low, S. (2013). Associations between peer victimization and academic performance. Theory into Practice, 52, 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0040541.2013.829724
  • Flaspohler, P. D., Elfstrom, J. L., Vanderzee, K. L., Sink, H. E., & Birchmeier, Z. (2009). Stand by me: The effects of peer and teacher support in mitigating the impact of bullying on quality of life. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 636-649. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20404
  • Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2014). Psychometrics. An introduction (2nd ed.). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: sage.
  • Gini, G. (2006). Bullying as a social process: The role of group memberships in students’ perception of inter-group aggression at school. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.12.2002
  • Gini, G., Albeiro, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002
  • Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Borghi, F., & Franzoni, L. (2008). The role of bystander in students’ perception of bullying and sense of safety. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 617-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.02.001
  • Gómez, T., León, B., & Felipe, E. (2011). Acoso escolar en estudiantes de educación primaria en Extremadura. Apuntes de Psicología, 29, 471-490. Recuperado de http://www.apuntesdepsicologia.es/index.php/revista/article/view/244
  • González, E., Peña, M. O., & Vera, J. A. (2017). Validación de una escala de roles de víctimas y agresores asociados al acoso escolar. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15, 224-239. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.4116009
  • Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., & Dekker, P. H. (2006). New participant role scales: Comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.2013
  • Hutching, J., & Clarkson, S. (2015). Introducing and piloting the KiVa bullying prevention programme in the uk. Educational & Child Psychology, 32, 49-61. Recuperado de http://www.kivaprogram.net/assets/files/kiva-ed-and-child-pdf.pdf
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2015). Encuesta de Cohesión Social para la Prevención de la Violencia y la Delincuencia. 2014. Ciudad de México, México: inegi.
  • Kessel, S. S., O`Donnel, L., & Smith, E. (2015). Trends in cyberbullying and school bullying victimization in a Regional Census of High School Students, 2006-2012. Journal of School Health, 85, 611-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12290
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Nueva York, EstadosUnidos: The Guilford Press.
  • Lucas-Molina, B., Williamson, A. A., Pulido, R., & Calderón, S. (2014). Adaptation of the Participant Role Scale (prs) in a Spanish youth sample: Measurement invariance across gender and relationship with sociometric status. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2904-2930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886250514527822
  • Machackova, H., & Pfetsch, J. (2016). Bystanders´ responses to offline and cyberbullying: The roles of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57, 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12277
  • Marín-Martínez, A., & Reidl-Martínez, L. M (2013). Validación psicométrica del cuestionario “Así nos llevamos en la escuela” para evaluar el hostigamiento (bullying) en primarias. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 18, 11-36.
  • Navarro-González, D.,Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2016). How response bias affects the factorial structure of personality self-reports. Psicothema, 29, 465-470. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.113
  • Nese, R. N.,Horner, R. H., Dickey, C. R., Stiller, B., &Tomlanovich, A. (2014). Dreceasing bullying behaviors in middle school: Expect respect. School Psychology Quartely, 29, 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000070
  • Nickerson, A. B., & Mele-Taylor, D. (2014). Empathetic responsiveness, group norms, and prosocial affiliation in bullying roles. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000052
  • Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princiotta, D. (2008). Attaachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 687-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.002
  • Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (2017). pisa 2015 Results (Vol. iii): Students well-being. París, Francia: oecd. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273856-en
  • Polanin, J. R., Espegale, D. L., & Piggott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41, 47-65.
  • Pöyhönen, V., Junoven, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Standing up for the victim, siding with the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situation. Social Development, 21, 722-741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00662.x
  • Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Thornberg, R. (2017). Getting angry matters: Going beyond perspective taking and empathic concern to understand bystanders’ behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 61, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.09.011
  • Robers, S., Zhang, J., Truman, J., & Snyder, T. D. (2012). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2011 (nces 2012-002/ncj 236021). Washington, EstadosUnidos: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics and U.S. Department of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistic.
  • Román, M., & Murillo, F. J. (2011). América Latina: violencia entre estudiantes y desempeño escolar. Revista Cepal, 14, 37-54. Recuperado de https://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/3/44073/RVE104RomanMurillo.pdf
  • Salmivalli, C. (2011). Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory into Practice, 53, 286-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947222
  • Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Voeten, M. (2005). Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 465-487. https://doi.org/10348/00709905X26011
  • Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)10982337(1996)22:1%3C1::aidab1%3E3.0.co;2-T
  • Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000488
  • Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M.,& Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystander matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescence Psychology, 40, 668-676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597070
  • Sánchez-Quejia, I., García-Moya, I., & Moreno, C. (2017). Trend analysis of bullying victimisation prevalence in Spanish adolescent youth at school. Journal of School Health, 87, 457-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12513
  • Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10047
  • Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)10 98-2337(1999)25:2<97::aid-ab3>3.0.CO;2-7
  • Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 475-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003
  • Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1
  • Turner, H. A., Finkelhor, D., Hamby, S. L., Shattuck, A., & Ormrod, R. K. (2011). Specifying type and location of peer victimization in a national sample of children and youth. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 40, 1052-1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9639-5
  • Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., & Sacco, F. C. (2004). The role of the bystander in the social architecture of bullying and violence in the schools and communities. Annals New York Academic of Sciences, 1036, 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1330.014
  • Trautman, A. (2008). Maltrato entre pares o “bullying”: una visión actual. Revista Chilena de Pediatría, 79,13-20. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0370-41062008000100002
  • Valdebenito, S., Ttofi, M., & Eisner, M. (2015). Prevalence rates of drug use among school bullies and victims: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.004
  • Valdés, A., & Carlos, E. (2014). Relación entre el autoconcepto social, el clima familiar y el clima escolar con el bullying en estudiantes de secundaria. Avances de Psicología Latinoamericana, 32, 447-457. https://doi.org/10.12804/apl32.03.2014.07
  • Valdés, A., & Carlos, E. (2017). Relación entre disciplina parental restaurativa, manejo de la vergüenza, compasión y acoso escolar. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 34, 37-45.
  • Van der Ploeg, R., Kretschmer, T., Salmivalli, C., & Veenstra, R. (2017). Defending victims: What does it take to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers. Journal of School Psychology, 65, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.002
  • Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Martell, B. N., Holland, K. M., & Westby, R. (2014). A systematic review and content analysis of bullying and cyber-bullying measurement strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.008
  • Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V, & Marini, Z. A. (2014). What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. Developmental Review, 34, 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.09.001
  • Vossen, H. G. M., Piotrowski, J. P., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Development of the adolescent measure of empathy and sympathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.040
  • Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeissen, C. (2007). Ordinal version of coefficients Alpha and Theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1177992180