Ownership concentration and firm performancethe moderating effect of the monitoring and provision of resources board roles

  1. Jaime Guerrero-Villegas 1
  2. Pilar Giráldez-Puig 2
  3. Leticia Pérez-Calero Sánchez 1
  4. José Manuel Hurtado-González 1
  1. 1 Department of Management and Marketing, Universidad Pablo de Olavide
  2. 2 Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, Universidad Pablo de, Seville
Revista:
Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

ISSN: 0210-2412

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 47

Número: 4

Páginas: 464-484

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1080/02102412.2018.1449722 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

Resumen

Este trabajo explora el efecto de la supervisión y la provisión de recursos proporcionados por el consejo de administración en la relación existente entre la concentración de la propiedad y los resultados de la empresa. La muestra está compuesta por 579 empresas europeas registradas en el índice STOXX Europe 600 durante el período 2002-2011. Los resultados muestran que la supervisión ejercida por el consejo influye positivamente en el efecto que tiene la concentración de la propiedad en los resultados. El trabajo también pone de manifiesto que la provisión de recursos del consejo tiene una influencia positiva en el rendimiento de la empresa en casi todos los niveles de la concentración de la propiedad, disminuyendo y teniendo efectos ligeramente negativos cuando los niveles de concentración son extremadamente altos.

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aggarwal, R. K., & Samwick, A. A., (2003). Performance incentives within firms: The effect of managerial responsibility. Journal of Finance, 58, 1613–1649
  • Aiken, L. S, & West, S. G., (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  • Amihud, Y., & Lev, B., (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for merger. Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 605–617
  • Amore, M. D., & Bennedsen, M., (2013). The value of local political connections in a low-corruption environment. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2), 387–402
  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S., (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297
  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O., (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51
  • Barroso, C., Villegas, M. M., & Pérez‐Calero, L., (2011). Board influence on a firm’s internationalization. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 351–367
  • Bauer, R., Guenster, N., & Otten, R., (2004). Empirical evidence on governance in Europe: The effect on stock returns, firm value and performance. Journal of Asset Management, 5, 91–104
  • Baysinger, B., & Hoskisson, R. E., (1990). The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15, 72–87
  • Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N., (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1, 101–124
  • Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A., (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate structure and strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 205–214
  • Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A., (2009). What matters in corporate governance? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827
  • Bebchuk, L., & Weisbach, M., (2010). The state of corporate governance research. Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 939–961
  • Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B., (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273
  • Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., & Saffar, W., (2012). The impact of political connections on firms’ operating performance and financing decisions. Journal of Financial Research, 35(3), 397–423
  • Boyd, B. K., (1990). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 301–312
  • Buchwald, A., (2017). Competition, outside directors and executive turnover: Implications for corporate governance in the EU. Managerial and Decision Economics, 38, 365–381
  • Burns, N., McTier, B. C., & Minnick, K., (2015). Equity-incentive compensation and payout policy in Europe. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 85–97
  • Campbell, J. T., Campbell, T. C., Sirmon, D. G., Bierman, L., & Tuggle, C. S., (2012). Shareholder influence over director nomination via proxy access: Implications for agency conflict and stakeholder value. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1431–1451. doi:10.1002/smj.2012.33.issue-12
  • Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D., (2001). The strategic context of external ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 639–660
  • Collis, D., & Montgomery, C., (2005). Corporate strategy: A resource based approach. New York: McGraw-Hill
  • Dahya, J., Orlin, D., & McConnell, J. J., (2008). Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 73–100
  • Daily, C., & Dalton, D., (1994, December). Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academic Management Journal, 37(6), 1603–1617
  • Daily, C., Dalton, D., & Cannella, A., (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialog and data. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, n. 3, 371–382
  • Dalton, D., Daily, C. M., Certo, T., & Roengpitya, R., (2003). Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion? The Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 13–26
  • Dalton, D., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E., (1999). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 269–290
  • Dalton, D., & Dalton, C. M., (2011). Integration of micro and macro studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance. Journal of Management, 37, 404–411
  • Dalton, D., Hitt, M. A., Certo, T. S., & Dalton, C. M., (2007). The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 1–64
  • Dalziel, T., Gentry, R. J., & Bowerman, M., (2011). An integrated agency–Resource dependence view of the influence of directors human and relational capital on firms’ R&D spending. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1217–1246
  • Demb, A., & Neubauer, F. F., (1992). The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes. Oxford; New York; Toronto and Melbourne: Oxford University Press
  • Desender, K. A., Aguilera, R. V., Crespi, R., & Garcia-Cestona, M., (2013). When does ownership matter? Board characteristics and behaviour. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 823–842
  • Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., Wiseman, R. M., & Arrfelt, M., (2008). Moving closer to the action: Examining compensation design effects on firm risk. Organization Science, 19(4), 548–566
  • Durnev, A., & Kim, E. H. A. N., (2005). To steal or not to steal: Firm attributes, legal environment, and valuation. The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1461–1493
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74
  • Elsilä, A., Kallunki, J.-P., Nilsson, H., & Sahlström, P., (2013). CEO Personal wealth, equity incentives and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21, 26–41
  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C., (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325
  • Fernández-Olmos, M., & Díez-Vial, I., (2013). Effect of firm’s resources on international diversification: An application in the Iberian Ham industry. European Management Journal, 31(2), 196–208
  • Filatotchev, I., Jackson, G., & Nakajima, C., (2013). Corporate governance and national institutions: A review and emerging research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4), 965–986
  • Finkelstein, S., & D’Aveni, R. A., (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1079–1108
  • Fox, M. A., & Hamilton, R. T., (1994). Ownership and diversification: Agency theory or stewardship theory. Journal of Management Studies, 31(1), 69–82
  • Francis, J., Schipper, K., & Vincent, L., (2005). Earnings and dividend informativeness when cash flow rights are separated from voting rights. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 329–360
  • Francis, J., & Smith, A., (1995). Agency costs and innovation some empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2−3), 383−409
  • García-Meca, E., (2016). Political connections, gender diversity and compensation policy. Review of Managerial Science, 10(3), 553–576
  • García-Ramos, R., & García-Olalla, M., (2011). Board characteristics and firm performance in public founder-and nonfounder-led family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(4), 220–231
  • Hill, C. W., & Snell, S. A., (1988). External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 577–590
  • Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A., & Paetzold, R., (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 235–256
  • Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T., (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28, 383–396
  • Houston, R., & Ferris, S., (2015). Does the revolving door swing both ways? The value of political connections to US firms. Managerial Finance, 41(10), 1002–1031
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H., (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360
  • Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J., (2007). Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance and International Review, 15, 194–207
  • Kathyayini, K. R. T., Carol, A., & Lester, L. H., (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: An Australian study. Corporate Governance, 12(2), 143–163
  • Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J., (2006). Multiple directorships and corporate performance in Australian listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 530–546
  • Kim, Y., (2005). Board network characteristics and firm performance in Korea. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 800–808
  • Klapper, L. F., & Love, I., (2004). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(2004), 703–728
  • Kor, Y. Y., & Misangyi, V. F., (2008). Outside directors’ industry‐specific experience and firms’ liability of newness. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1345–1355
  • Kor, Y. Y., & Sundaramurthy, C., (2009). Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management, 35(4), 981–1006
  • Kosnik, R. D., (1990). Effects of board demography and directors’ incentives on corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 129–150
  • Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., & Wright, P., (2008). Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 363–382
  • Kula, V., & Tatoglu, E., (2006). Board process attributes and company performance of family-owned business in Turkey. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Effective Board Performance, 6, 624–634
  • Kumar, P., & Zattoni, A., (2013). Corporate governance, board of directors, and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(4), 311–313
  • La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A., (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, LIV, 471–517
  • La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W., (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57, 1147–1170
  • Li, Q., Luo, W., Wang, Y., & Wu, L., (2013). Firms performance, corporate ownership, and corporate social responsibility disclosure in China. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(2), 159–173
  • López Iturriaga, F.J, & Morrós Rodríguez, I. (2014). Boards of directors and firm performance: the effect of multiple directorships. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 43(2), 177-192
  • Lorca, P., Andrées, J. D., & Martínez, A. B., (2012). Size and culture as determinants of the web policy of listed firms: The case of web accessibility in Western European countries. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 392–405
  • Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E., (1989). Pawns or potentates: The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration
  • Mangena, M., Tauringana, V., & Chamisa, E., (2012). Corporate boards, ownership structure and firm performance in an environment of severe political and economic crisis. British Journal of Management, 23(S1), S23–S41
  • Méndez, C. F., García, R. A., & Rodríguez, E. F., (2012). Incidencia de las comisiones de nombramientos y retribuciones sobre las remuneraciones de los consejeros ejecutivos. Cuadernos De Economía Y Dirección De La Empresa, 15(1), 33–41
  • Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A., (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 829–858
  • Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L., (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433
  • Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., Nielsen, S., & Huse, M., (2012). Board task performance: An exploration of micro- and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 193–215
  • Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B., (1994). A longitudinal study of borrowing by large American corporations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 118–140
  • Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W., (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315
  • Munisi, G., Hermes, N., & Randøy, T., (2014). Corporate boards and ownership structure: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. International Business Review, 23, 785–796
  • Nicholson, G. J., & Kiel, G. C., (2004). Breakthrough board performance: How to harness your board’s intellectual capital. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 4(1), 5–23
  • Ong, C. H., & Lee, S. H., (2000). Board functions and firm performance: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Comparative International Management, 3, 3–24
  • Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T., (2013). Globalization of monitoring practices: The case of American influences on the dismissal risk of European CEOs. Journal of Economics and Business, 70, 3–15
  • Palmer, T. M., & Varner, I. I., (2007). A comparison of the international diversity on top management teams of multinational firms based in the United States, Europe, and Asia: Status and implications. Singapore Management Review, 29(1), 1-30
  • Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A., (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411–438
  • Peng, M. W., (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 433–451
  • Pérez-Calero Sánchez, L., Villegas Perinan, M. D. M., & Barroso Castro, C., (2016). A framework for board capital. Corporate Governance, 16(3), 452–475
  • Petrovic, J., (2008). Unlocking the role of a board director: A review of the literature. Management Decision, 46, 1373–1392
  • Pfeffer, J., (1972). Size and composition of corporate board of directors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 218–228
  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R., (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row
  • Piekkari, R., Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T., (2015). The silent board: How language diversity may influence the work processes of corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(1), 25–41
  • Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., & García‐Meca, E., (2014). Institutional investors on boards and audit committees and their effects on financial reporting quality. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(4), 347–363
  • Pugliese, A., & Wenstøp, P. Z., (2007). Board members’ contribution to strategic decision-making in small firms. Journal of Management & Governance, 11(4), 383–404
  • Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R., (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 155–160
  • Sambharya, R. B., (1996). Foreign experience of top management teams and international diversi- cation strategies of U.S. multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 17(9), 739–746
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W., (1986). Large shareholder and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461–488
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W., (1988). Value maximization and the acquisition process. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 7–20
  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W., (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783
  • Sorescu, A. B., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C., (2008). Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. Journal of Marketing, 87(October), 82–101
  • Staples, C. L., (2007). Board globalisation in the world’s largest TNCs 1993–2005. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 311–321
  • Stearns, L. B., & Mizruchi, M. S., (1993). Board composition and corporate nancing: The impact of nancial institution representation on borrowing. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 603–618
  • Stiles, P., & Taylor, B., (2001). Boards at work: How directors view their roles and responsibilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Sundaramurthy, C., Pukthuanthong, K., & Kor, Y., (2014). Positive and negative synergies between the CEO’s and the corporate board’s human and social capital: A study of biotechnology firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(6), 845–868
  • Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T., (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European Companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 689–705
  • Tuschke, A., & Sanders, W., (2003). Antecedents and consequences of corporate governance reform: The case of Germany. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 631–649
  • Van Essen, M., Engelen, P. J., & Carney, M., (2013). Does “good” corporate governance help in a crisis? The impact of country- and firm-level governance mechanisms in the European financial crisis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21, 201–224
  • Van Veen, K., Sahib, P. R., & Aangeenbrug, E., (2014). Where do international board members come from? Country-level antecedents of international board member selection in European boards. International Business Review, 23(2), 407–417
  • Wang, K., & Shailer, G., (2015). Ownership concentration and firm performance in emerging markets: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(2), 199–229
  • Westphal, J. D., (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-Board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 7–24
  • Westphal, J. D., & Fredrickson, J. W., (2001). Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1113–1137
  • Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M., (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 581–606. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
  • Yammeesri, J., & Kanthi Herath, S., (2010). Board characteristics and corporate value: Evidence from Thailand. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(3), 279–292
  • Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y., (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196–220
  • Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O., & Naldi, L., (2007). The effects of ownership and governance on SMEs’ international knowledge-based resources. Small Business Economics, 29(3), 309–327