La evaluación de las políticas de regeneración urbanapropuesta metodológica para la delimitación de áreas experimentales y equivalentes

  1. José Manuel Betanzos-Martín 1
  2. Antonio Echaves-García 2
  3. Rafael Moya-Alfonso 3
  4. Clemente J. Navarro-Yáñez 2
  1. 1 Autonomía Sur, SCA
  2. 2 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

  3. 3 Comunidad de Madrid
    info

    Comunidad de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/040scgh75

Zugehörigkeit anzeigen +
Zeitschrift:
Revista de estudios andaluces

ISSN: 0212-8594,  2340-2776

Datum der Publikation: 2018

Nummer: 36

Seiten: 146-177

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.12795/REA.2018.I36.07 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista de estudios andaluces

Zusammenfassung

This article analyses a methodological proposal for the delimitation of territorial areas applying a quasi-experimental strategy, comparing areas where projects have been developed based in urban regeneration called “experimental areas” with similar ones without any project, called “equivalent areas”. This methodology is a necessary previous step to analyze the effect of programs about urban regeneration, which will allow subsequently to compare the evolution of similar pairs among themselves (experimental and equivalent areas). Firstly, we explain the underlying objective of delimitation in these territorial areas. Secondly, the methodology used to select the equivalent areas is described. Thirdly, the results are presented, it means, the delimitation of experimental and equivalent areas. Finally, through means of specific statistical procedures, analysis of variance or ANOVA of a factor, the obtained results are validated. The work is focused on Andalusian cities with a population over 100.000 inhabitants in which urban regeneration projects have been implemented.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Brama, A. (2013). The Effects of Neighbourhood Regeneration on the Neighbourhood Hierarchy of the Cities. En Van Ham et al. (eds.), Understanding Neighbourhood Dynamics (pp.111-138). New York: Springer.
  • Clark, E. (2005). The order and simplicity of gentrification: a political challenge. En Atkinson, R. y Bridge, G. (org.), Gentrification in a Global Context: the new urban colonialism. Oxon, Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392089_chapter_16
  • Cordero Martín, G. (2000). Los servicios sociales en Andalucía (pp. 272-293). En Cano García, G. (dir.) Conocer Andalucía. Gran enciclopedia andaluza del siglo XXI. Vol.7.
  • Díaz Parra, I. (2013). La gentrificación en la cambiante estructura socioespacial de la ciudad. Biblio 3W. Revista Bibliográfica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales. [En línea]. Universidad de Barcelona, Vol. XVIII, nº 1030. Recuperado de <http://www.ub.es/geocrit/b3w-1030.htm>.
  • Glass, R. (1964). London, Aspects of Change. Londres: Macgibbon & Kee.
  • Hamel, J. (1993). Case Study Methods. Newbury Park, Cal., Sage. doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983587
  • Hollister, R.G. y Hill, J. (1995). Problems in the evaluation of community-wide initiatives. En Connell, J.P., Kubisch, A.C. y Schorr, L.B. y Weiss, C.H. (eds.), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives (pp. 127-172). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
  • Lawless, P. (2007). Continuing dilemmas for area based urban regeneration: evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme in England. People, Place and Policy, 1(1), pp. 14-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.0001.0001.0003
  • Ministerio de Fomento (2015). Atlas de Vulnerabilidad Urbana. [En línea] Recuperado de < http://atlasvulnerabilidadurbana.fomento.es/>
  • Navarro, C.J. (2013). Have creative cities a dark side? Cities, 35, pp. 213-220.
  • Navarro, C.J. y Rodríguez-García, M.J. (2015). Model of local governing coalitions: politics or policy effects? Urban Geography. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1034485
  • O’Reilly, D. (2007). Comment on Rhodes et al. (2005): “Some further thoughts on assessing the effects of area-based initiatives on local outcomes”. Urban Studies, 44(5/6), pp. 1145-1153. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701255973
  • Rhodes, J., Tyler, P. y Brennan, A. (2005). Assessing the Effect of Area Based Initiatives on Local Area Outcomes: Some Thoughts Based on the National Evaluation of the Single Regeneration Budget in England. Urban Studies, 42(11), pp. 1919-1946. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500280347
  • Rossi, P.H. (1999). Evaluating Community Development Programs: Problems and Prospects (pp. 521- 568). En Ferguson, R.F. y Dickens, W.T. (eds.): Urban Problems and Community Development, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  • Smelser, N.J. (1982). La comparazione nelle scienze social. Bologna, il Mulino.
  • Taylor, D. y Balloch, S. (2005). The politics of evaluation: an overview. En Taylor, D. and Balloch, S. (eds), The politics of evaluation, (pp.2-19). Bristol: The Polity Press.
  • Tobler, W. (1979). Cellular geography. En Gale, S. y G. Olsson (eds.), Philosophy in Geography, (Dordrecht: Reidel). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9394-5_18
  • Thomson, H. (2008). A dose of realism for healthy urban policy: lessons from area-based initiatives in UK. Journal of Epidemiological Community Health, 62, pp. 932-936. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.068775
  • Wei, F. y Knox, P.L. (2014). Neighborhood Change in Metropolitan America, 1990 to 2010. Urban Affairs Review, 50(4), pp. 459-489. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087413501640
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet