Reestructuración y tipo de propiedad en empresas en crisisdiferencias entre empresas familiar y no familiares

  1. Casillas, Jose Carlos 1
  2. Barbero Navarro, José Luis 2
  3. Moreno Menéndez, Ana María 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

  2. 2 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

Revista:
Revista de Empresa Familiar

ISSN: 2174-2529

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 3

Número: 1

Páginas: 7-20

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.24310/EJFBEJFB.V3I1.4037 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Empresa Familiar

Resumen

El presente trabajo analiza la influencia de la estructura de propiedad en las estrategias de reestructuración en empresas en crisis, específicamente, en el caso de las pequeñas y medianas empresas. En concreto, nos centramos en el estudio de las diferencias entre empresas familiares y no familiares a la hora de afrontar y reaccionar ante resultados decrecientes. Sobre una muestra de 1.807 empresas españolas (PYMEs), de las que 947 están controladas por una persona o familia, hemos encontrado que las empresas familiares con resultados negativos tienden a mantener o aumentar puestos de trabajo al tiempo que reducen sus activos a través de procesos de desinversión. Asimismo, hemos comprobado que esta relación se da con mayor intensidad en el caso de las empresas familiares de menor tamaño y edad. Finalmente, el nivel de concentración de la propiedad también parece ejercer un papel moderador. 

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abor, J., Graham, M. and Yawson, A. (2011). Corporate Governance and restructuring activities following completed bids. Corporate Governance, An International Review, 19(1), 61-76.
  • Aguilera, R. and Crespí, R. (2012). Firm family firms: Current debates of corporate governance in family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3, 66-69.
  • Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
  • Ansoff, H.I. (1957). Strategies for Diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.
  • Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W. and Van Gils, A. (2011). Boards of Directors in Family Businesses: A literature Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 134–152.
  • Barker, V.L. and Mone, M.A. (1994). Retrenchment: Cause of turnaround or consequence of decline? Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 395-405.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  • Behn, R.D. (1980). Leadership for cut-back management: The use of corporate strategy. Public Administration Review, 40(6), 613.
  • Boyle, R.D. Desai, H.B. (1991). Turnaround strategies for small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(3), 33-42.
  • Casillas, J.C., Moreno, A.M. and Barbero, J.L. (2010). A Configurational Approach of the Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation Growth of Family Firms. Family Business Review, 23(1), 27-44.
  • Cater III, J.J. and Schwab, A. (2008). Turnaround strategies in established small family firms. Family Business Review, 21(1), 31-50.
  • Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H. and Steier, L.P. (2003). An introduction to theories of family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 441- 448.
  • Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J. and Steier, L.P. (2003). Extending the theoretical horizons of family business research. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice, 27(4), 331-338.
  • Collis, D.J. and Montgomery, C.A. (1998). Crating corporate advantage. Harvard Business Review. 76(3), 70-84.
  • D'Aveni, R.A. (1989). The aftermath of organizational decline: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 577-605.
  • Di Primio, A. (1988). When turnaround management works. The Journal of Business Strategy, 9(1), 61-64.
  • Gedajlovic, E., Lubatkin, M.H. Schulze, W.S. (2004). Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: a generational perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 899-912.
  • Goldeng, E., Grünfeld, L.A. and Benito, G.R.G. (2008). The performance differential between private state owned enterprises: The roles of ownership, management market structure. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7), 1244-1273.
  • Hall, W.K. (1980). Survival strategies in a hostile environment. Harvard Business Review, 58(5), 75- 85.
  • Harrison, J.S., Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and Irel, R.D. (2001). Resoruces complementary in business combinations: Extending the logic to business combinations. Journal of Management, 27(6), 679-690.
  • Haynes, M., Thompson, S. and Wright, M. (2003). The determinants of corporate divestment: Evidence from a panel of UK firms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52, 147–166.
  • Hofer, C. W. and Schendel, D. (1978). Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
  • Ibrahim, A.B., Soufani, K. and Lam, J. (2001). A study of succession in a family firm. Family Business Review, 14(3), 245-258.
  • International Monetary Found. (2010) Oslo Conference.
  • Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
  • Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305−360.
  • Jensen, M.C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
  • Kierulff, H. and Petersen, H.L. (2009). Finance is everything: Advice from turnaround managers. Journal of Business Strategy, 30(6), 44-51.
  • Knott, A.M. and Posen, H.E. (2005). Is failure good? Strategic Management Journal, 26(7), 617- 641.
  • Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing Management, the millenium edition, international edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Lieberman, M.B. (1987). Strategies for Capacity Expansion. Sloan Management Review, 28(4), 19- 28.
  • Miller, D., Breton-Miller, I. and Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family business. Journal of Management, 45(1), 51–78.
  • Mitchell, J.R., Hart, T.A., Valcea, S. and Townsend, D.M. (2009). Becoming the boss: Discretion postsuccession success in family firms. Entrepreneurship, Theory Practice, 33(6), 1201- 1218.
  • Moreno, A.M. and Casillas, J.C. (2008). Entrepreneurial Orientation Growth of SMEs: A causal model. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice. 32(3), 507-528.
  • Morrow Jr, J.L., Johnson, R. A. and Busenitz, L.W. (2004). The effects of cost asset retrenchment on firm performance: The overlooked role of a firm's competitive enrivonment. Journal of Management, 30(2), 189-208.
  • Murphy, J. (1986). First aid for unhealthy companies. Australian Accountant, 56(4), 29.
  • Nordqvist, M. and Melin, L. (2010). Entrepreneurial families family firms. Entrepreneurship. Regional Development, 22(3-4), 211-239.
  • Nordqvist, M., Habbershon, T.G. and Melin L. (2008). Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring entrepreneurial orientation in family firms. In H. Landstrom, D. Smallbone, H. Crijns and E. Laveren (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, sustainable growth and performance: Frontiers in European entrepreneurship research. London: Edward Elgar.
  • Pearce II, J. A. and Robbins, D.K. (2008). Strategic transformation as the essential last step in the process of business turnaround. Business Horizons, 51(2), 121-130.
  • Pearce II, J.A. and Robbins, D.K. (1994a). Entrepreneurial recovery strategies of small market share manufacturers. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(2), 91-108.
  • Pearce II, J.A. and Robbins, D.K. (1994b). Retrenchment remains the foundation of business turnaround. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 407-417.
  • Pearce II, J.A. and Robbins, K. (1993). Toward improved theory research on business turnaround. Journal of Management, 19(3), 613-636.
  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley.
  • Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.
  • Porter, M.E. and Spence, A.M. (1982). The capacity expansion process in a growing oligopoly: The case of Corn Wet Milling. In J.J. McCall (Ed.), Economics of Information Uncertainty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Rahul, K. Hitt, M.A. (1998). Research notes communications linking corporate strategy to capital structure: Diversification strategy, type source of financing. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 601-610.
  • Rahul, K. (1996). Explaining firm capital structure: The role of agency theory vs. transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal, 17(9), 713-728.
  • Robbins, D.K. and Pearce II, J.A. (1992). Turnaround: Retrenchment Recovery. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 287-309.
  • Robbins, D.K. and Pearce II, J.A. (1993). Entrepreneurial retrenchment among small manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 301-318.
  • Rumelt, R.P. (1974). Strategy, structure, economic performance. Cambridge, Massachussets: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Schulze, W. G., Lubatkin, M. H. and Dino, R. N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 179–194.
  • Shanker, M.C. and Astrachan, J.H. (1996). Myths realities: Family businesses contribution to U.S. economy- A framework for assessing family business statistics. Family Business Review, 9(4), 107-119.
  • Sharma, P. (2003). Stakeholder mapping technique: Toward the development of a family firm typology. Laurie Business & Economics, Waterloo: Canada. (Ac-Acta Wasaensia 145 cessed on August 29, 2012) https://webaccess.wlu.ca/documents/842/2003–01– MOB.pdf.
  • Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1–36.
  • Ward, J.L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, family leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C. Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice, 28(4), 363-381.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet