Un modelo de adopción de innovacionesel caso del teletrabajo

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adams, D., Nelson, R., y Todd, P. (1992): “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication”, MIS Quarterly, 16: 227-247.
• Bailey, D. y Kurland, N. (2002): “A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work”, Journal of Organizational Dynamics, 28: 383-400.
• Barnes, K. (1994): “Tips for managing telecommuters”, HR Focus, 71: 9-10.
• Baruch, Y. (2000): “Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 15: 34-48.
• Baruch, Y. (2001): “The status of research on teleworking and an agenda for future research”, International Journal of Management Review, 3: 113-129.
• Baruch, Y. y Nicholson, N. (1997:, “Home, sweet work: requirements for effective home working”, Journal of General Management, 23: 15-30.
• Bélanger, F. (1999): “Workers´ propensity to telecommute: An empirical study”, Information & Management, 35: 139-153.
• Brancheau, J. y Wetherbe, J. (1990): “The adoption of spreadsheet software: testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end user computing”, Information Systems Research, 1: 115-143.
• Civit, C. y March, M. (2000): Implantación del Teletrabajo en la Empresa, Barcelona: Ediciones Gestión 2000.
• Chapman, A., Sheehy, N.P., Heywood, S., Dooley, B. y Collins, S.C.(1995), “The organizational implications of teleworking”, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology”, 10: 229-248.
• Chau, P. y Hui, K. (2001): “Determinants of small business EDI adoption: an empirical investigation”, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 11: 229-252.
• Chau, P. y Hu, P. (2002): “Investigating healthcare professionals´ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories”, Information & Management, 39: 297-311.
• Daniels, K., Lamond, D. y Standen, P. (2001): “Teleworking: frameworks for organizational research”, Journal of Management Studies, 38: 1151-1185.
• Davis, F. (1989): “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, 13: 319-340.
• Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. y Warshaw, P. (1989): “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, 35: 982-1003.
• Duxbury, L. y Neufeld, D. (1999): “An empirical evaluation of the impact of telecommuting on intra-organizational communication”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 16: 1-28.
• Dyer, J. y Nobeoka, K. (2000): “Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case”, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 345-367.
• Eaton, S. (2003): “If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance”, Industrial Relations, 42: 145-167.
• Empirica (2000): Conditions for the Development of New Ways of Working and Electronic Commerce in Spain, Madrid: Empirica & DyR.
• Fishbein, M. y Azjen, I. (1975): Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley.
• Gillespie, A., Richardson, R. y Cornford, J. (1995): Review of Teleworking in Britain: Implications for Public Policy, Londres: Report to the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology.
• Gray, P. (1995), “The virtual workplace”, OR/MS Today, 22: 22-26.
• Gray, M., Hodson, N. y Gordon, G. (1993): Teleworking Explained, Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Hakim, C. (1995): “Firm feminist myths about women´s employment”, British Journal of Sociology, 46: 429-455.
• Hamblin, H. (1995): “Employees perspectives on one dimension of labour flexibility: working at a distance”, Work, Employment and Society, 9: 473-498.
• Harrington, S. y Ruppel, C. (1999): “Telecommuting: A test of trust, competing values, and relative advantage”, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42: 223-239.
• Hill, E., Miller, B., Weiner, S. y Colihan, J. (1998): “Influences of the virtual office on aspects of work and work/life balance”, Personnel Psychology, 5: 667-684.
• Hochschild, A. (1997): The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work, Henry Holt & Company, Inc.
• Huselid, M. (1995): “The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 38: pp. 635-672.
• Huws, U., Korte, W. y Robinson, S. (1990): Telework: Towards the Elusive Office, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
• Illegems, V., Verbeke, A. y S´Jegers, R. (2001): “The organizational context of teleworking implementation”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 68: 275-291.
• INE (2002): Encuesta sobre Innovación Tecnológica en las Empresas, Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística.
• Ingram, P. y Simons, T. (1995): “Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues”, Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1466-1487.
• Karnowski, S. y White, B. (2002): “The role of facility managers in the diffusion of organizational telecommuting”, Environment and Behavior, 34: 322-334.
• Khalifa, M. y Elezadi, J. (1997): “Telecommuting: A study of employees´ beliefs”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 38: 78-85.
• Koch, M. y McGrath, R. (1996): “Improving labour productivity: Human resource management policies do matter”, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 335-354.
• Konrad, A. y Mangel, R. (2000): “The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity”, Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1225-1237.
• Konradt, U., Schmook, R. y Mälecke, M. (2000): “Impacts of telework on individuals, organizations and families-A critical review”, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15: 63-99.
• Kurland, N. y Cooper, C. (2002): “Manager control and employee isolation in telecommuting environments”, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13: 107-126.
• Leede, J. y Riemsdijk, M. (2001): External labour flexibility and teamwork in manufacturing: are the two compatible?, Actas del 8º Congreso internacional de EUROMA, Bath (Reino Unido), pp. 1235-1248.
• Malone, T. y Laubacher, R. (1998): “The dawn of the e-lance economy”, Harvard Business Review, 76: 144-152.
• McCloskey, D. e Igbaria, M. (1998): “A review of the empirical research on telecommuting and directions for future research”, en M.Igbaria y M.Tan (eds.).
• The Virtual Workplace, Hershey PA: Idea Group Publishing. McGrath, P. y Houlihan, M. (1998): “Conceptualising telework: modern or postmodern”, en P. Jackson and J. Wielen (eds), Teleworking: International Perspectives, From Telecommuting to the Virtual Organization, Londres: Routledge.
• Mokhtarian, P. y Salomon, I. (1997): “Modeling the desire to telecommute: The importance of attitudinal factors in behavioral models”, Transportation Research, 31: 35-50.
• Nilles, J. (1998), Managing Telework. Strategies for Managing the Virtual Workforce, Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Olson, M. (1989), “Work at home for computer professionals. Current attitudes and futures prospects”, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 7: 317-338.
• Omari, M. y Standen, P. (2000): “Selection for telework”, en K. Daniels, D.A.Lamond y P.Standen (eds.) Managing Telework. London: Thomson Learning.
• Ommeren, J. (2000): “Performance management and compensation”, en K. Daniels, D. Lamond y P. Standen (eds), Managing Telework, Londres: ITP.
• Osterman, P. (1995), “Work/family programs and the employment relationship”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 681-700.
• Pérez, M., Martínez, A. y de Luis, Mª P. (2002): “Benefits and barriers of telework: Perception differences of human resources managers according to company´s operations strategy”, Technovation. The International Journal of Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 22: 775-783.
• Pérez, M., Martínez, A. y de Luis, M. P. (2003): “The management of teleworking adoption: an organisational study of feasibiity perception in industrial and service companies”, International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 3: 226-248.
• Peters, P., Tijdens, K. y Wetzels, C. (2004): “Employees´ opportunities, preferences, and practices in telecommuting adoption”, Information & Management, 41: 469-482.
• Perry-Smith, J. y Blum, T. (2000): “Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 43: 1107-1117.
• Pinsonneault, A. y Boisvert, M. (2001): “The impacts of telecommuting on organizations and individuals: a review of the literature”, en N. Johason (ed.) Telecommuting and Virtual Offices: Issues and Opportunities. Hershey PA: Idea Group Publishing.
• Powell, T. y Dent-Micallef, A. (1997): “Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources”, Strategic Management Journal, 28: 375-405.
• Prescott, M. y Conger, S. (1995): “Information technology innovations: a classification by IT locus of impact and research approach”, Data Base, 26: 20-41.
• Raghuram, S. (1996): “Knowledge creation in the telework context”, International Journal of Technology Management, 11: 859-871.
• Raghuram, S., Garud, R., Wiesenfield, B. y Gupta, V. (2001): “Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment. Journal of Management, 27: 383-405.
• Raghuram, S., Wiesenfield, B. y Garud, R. (2003): “Technology enabled work: The role of self-efficacy in determining telecommuter adjustment and structuring behavior”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63: 180-198.
• Rogers, E. (1983): Diffusion of Innovations, Nueva York: Free Press.
• Ruppel, C. y Harrington, S. (1995), “Telework: An innovation where nobody is getting on the band-wagon”, Database, 26: 87-104.
• Scott, C. y Timmerman, C. (1999), “Communication technology use and multiple workplace identifications among organizational teleworkers with varied degrees of virtuality”, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 41: 240-260.
• Segars, A. y Grover, V. (1993), “Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis”, MIS Quarterly, 17: 517-525.
• Shin, B., Sheng, O. y Higa, K. (2000), “Telework: Existing research and future directions”, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 10: 85-101.
• Standen, P. (1997), “Home, work and management in the information age”, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, 3: 1-14.
• Szajna, B. (1994), “Software evaluation and choice: predictive evaluation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument”, MIS Quarterly, 18: 319-324.
• Teo, T., Lim, V. y Wai, S. (1998), “An empirical study of attitudes towards teleworking among information technology (IT) personnel”, International Journal of Information Management, 18: 329-343.
• Tomaskovic-Devey, D. y Risman, B. (1993), “Telecommuting innovation and organization: A contingency theory of labor process change”, Social Science Quarterly, 74: 367-385.
• Tornatzky, L. y Klein, K. (1982), “Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta analysis of findings”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29: 28-45.
• Travic, B. (1998), “Information aspects of new organizational designs: exploring the non-traditional organization”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49: 1224-1244.
• Watad, M. y Disanzo, F. (2000), “Case study the synergism of telecommuting and office automation”, Sloan Management Review, 41: 85-96.
• Wood, S. (1999), “Family-friendly management: testing the various perspectives”, National Institute Economic Review, 168: 99-116.
• Workman, M., Kahnweiter, W. y Bommer, W. (2003), “The effects of cognitive style and media richness on commitment to telework and virtual teams”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63: 199-219.