Centrality in networks of geographically proximate firms and competitive capabilities

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adler, P. S., Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367
• Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.
• Almeida, P., Dokko, G., Rosenkopf, L. (2003). Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: Increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? Research Policy, 32(2), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00101-4
• Anderson, J. C., Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
• Baptista, R., Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1
• Barabel, M., Huault, I., Meier, O. (2007). Changing nature and sustainability of the industrial district model: The case of Technic Valley in France. Growth and Change, 38(4), 595–620.
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
• Baum, J. A. C., McEvily, B., Rowley, T. J. (2012). Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organization Science, 23(2), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2008.33625391
• Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R. (2002). Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 92–124.
• Bell, G. G. (2005). Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic management journal, 26(3), 287–295.
• Bell, G. G., Zaheer, A. (2007). Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organization Science, 18(6), 955–972. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0308
• Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505–522.
• Borgatti, S., Everett, M., Freeman, L. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies.
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
• Boschma, R., Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks: A proximity perspective. In Boschma, R., Martin, R. (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 120–135). Edward Elgar.
• Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
• Capaldo, A. (2007). Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.621
• Chen, M.-J., Farh, J.-L., MacMillan, I. C. (1993). An exploration of the expertness of outside informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1614–1632. https://doi.org/10.2307/256823
• Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
• Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundation of social theory. Harvard University Press.
• Cooke, P. (2002). Knowledge economies. Routledge.
• Cooke, P., Wills, D. (1999). Small firms, social capital and the enhancement of business performance through innovation programmes. Small Business Economics, 13(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008178808631
• Dangalchev, C. (2006). Residual closeness in networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 365(2), 556–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.12.020
• Dokko, G., Kane, A. A., Tortoriello, M. (2014). One of us or one of my friends: How social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies, 35(5), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613508397
• Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094429
• Elfring, T., Hulsink, W. (2001). Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026180418357
• Fleming, L., King, C., Juda, A. I. (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18(6), 938–954. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0289
• Fornahl, D., Broekel, T., Boschma, R. (2011). What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00361.x
• Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–390.
• Foss, N. (1996). Higher-order industrial capabilities and competitive advantage. Journal of Industry Studies, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719600000001
• García-Villaverde, P. M., Parra-Requena, G., Molina-Morales, F. X. (2018). Structural social capital and knowledge acquisition: Implications of cluster membership. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(5–6), 530–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1407366
• Giuliani, E., Bell, M. (2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 34(1), 47–68.
• Glasmeier, A. (2011). Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. Research Policy, 20(4), 469–485.
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
• Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
• Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094162
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. (2005). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson.
• Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032
• Helfat, C. E., Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
• Hendry, C., Brown, J. (2006). Organizational networking in UK biotechnology clusters. British Journal of Management, 17, 55–73.
• Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Albors-Garrigos, J. (2014). Are technology gatekeepers renewing clusters? Understanding gatekeepers and their dynamics across cluster life cycles. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(5–6), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.933489
• Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing process and literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 1–43.
• Inkpen, A. C., Tsang, E. W. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.15281445
• Kraatz, M. S. (1998). Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaption to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.2307/256961
• Krackhardt, T. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In Nohria, N., Eccles, R. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 216–239). Harvard Business School Press.
• Lane, P. J., Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L
• Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159588
• Latora, V., Marchiori, M. (2001). Efficient behavior of smallworld networks. Physical Review Letters, 87(19), 198701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.198701
• Lechner, C., Leyronas, C. (2012). The competitive advantage of cluster firms: The priority of regional network position over extra-regional networks—A study of a French high-tech cluster. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(5–6), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.617785
• Leenders, R. T. A. J . (2002). Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks, 24(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00049-1
• Leonard, N. J., Taylor, W. W., Goddard, C. I., Frank, K. A., Krause, A. E., Schechter, M. G. (2011). Information flow within the social network structure of a joint strategic plan for management of Great Lakes fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 31, 629–655.
• Li, H., de Zubielqui, G., O’Connor, A. (2015). Entrepreneurial networking capacity of cluster firms: A social network perspective on how shared resources enhance firm performance. Small Business Economics, 45(3), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9659-8
• Lindell, M. K., Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
• Mahmood, I. P., Zhu, H., Zajac, E. J. (2011). Where can capabilities come from? Network ties and capability acquisition in business groups. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 820–848.
• Marsden, P., Campbell, K. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63(2), 482–501.
• Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (Revised ed.). Macmillan; Prometheus Books.
• McEvily, B., Marcus, A. (2005). Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11), 1033–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.484
• McEvily, B., Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133–1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199912)20:12<1133::AID-SMJ74>3.0.CO;2-7
• McFadyen, M. A., Semadeni, M., Cannella, A. A. (2009). Value of strong ties to disconnected others: Examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organization Science, 20(3), 552–564. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0388
• Molina-Morales, F. X., Martínez-Cháfer, L. (2016). Cluster firms: You’ll never walk alone. Regional Studies, 50(5), 877–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.952719
• Molina-Morales, F. X., Martinez-Fernandez, M. T. (2009). Too much love in the neighborhood can hurt: How an excess of intensity and trust in relationships may produce negative effects on firms. Strategic Management Journal, 30(9), 1013–1023. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.766
• Molina-Morales, F. X., Martínez-Fernández, M. T., Torlo, V. J. (2011). The dark side of trust: The benefits, costs and optimal levels of trust for innovation performance. Long Range Planning, 44(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2011.01.001
• Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129–1151. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.486
• Morrison, A., Rabellotti, R. (2009). Knowledge and information networks in an Italian wine cluster. European Planning Studies, 17(7), 983–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310902949265
• Nahapiet, J. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
• Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006
• Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0054
• Padula, G. (2008). Enhancing the innovation performance of firms by balancing cohesiveness and bridging ties. Long Range Planning, 41(4), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.01.004
• Paniccia, I. (1998). One, a hundred, thousands of industrial districts. Organizational variety in local networks of small and medium-sized enterprises. Organization Studies, 19(4), 667–699.
• Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the firm. John Wiley.
• Phelps, C. C., Heidl, R., Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1115–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311432640
• Podsakoff, P. M., Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–545.
• Portes, A., Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320–1350.
• Pouder, R., St. John, C. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: Geographic clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1192–1225. https://doi.org/10.2307/259168
• Provan, K., Fish, A., Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302554
• Reagans, R., McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556658
• Rocha, H. O., Sternberg, R. (2005). Entrepreneurship: The role of clusters theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence from Germany. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1993-9
• Rowley, T., Behrens, D., Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::AID-SMJ93>3.0.CO;2-M
• Ruiz-Ortega, M. L., Parra-Requena, G., García-Villaverde, P. M., Rodrigo-Alarcon, J. (2017). How does the closure of interorganizational relationships affect entrepreneurial orientation? Business Research Quarterly, 20(3), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2017.04.003
• Sabidussi, G. (1966). “The centrality index of a graph.” Psychometrika, 31(4), 581–603.
• Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128. Harvard University Press.
• Sciascia, S., D’Oria, L., Bruni, M., Larrañeta, B. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation in lowand medium-tech industries: The need for absorptive capacity to increase performance. European Management Journal, 32(5), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.007
• Scott, A. J. (2000). The cultural economy of cities: Essays on the geography of image-producing industries. SAGE.
• Shapiro, A. S. S., Wilk, M. B. (2016). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3), 591–611. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2333709
• Simonin, B. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595–623.
• Sobrero, M., Roberts, E. B. (2001). The trade-off between efficiency and learning in interorganizational relationships for product development. Management Science, 47(4), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.4.493.9828
• Staber, U. (2010). Imitation without interaction: How firms identify with clusters. Organization Studies, 31(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609357369
• Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. The Guilford Press.
• Stuart, T. E., Sorensen, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32, 229–253.
• Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2004.12736089
• Teece, D. D., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
• Ter Wal, A. L. J., Boschma, R. (2011). Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies, 45(7), 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802662658
• Tortoriello, M., Reagans, R., McEvily, B. (2012). Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization Science, 23(5), 1024–1039. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0688
• Trigilia, C. (2001). Social capital and local development. European Journal of Social Theory, 4(4), 427–442.
• Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.
• Tsai, W., Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/257085
• Uzzi, B., Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504. https://doi.org/10.1086/432782
• Whittington, K. B., Owen-smith, J., Powell, W. W. (2009). Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 90–122. https://doi.org/0001-8392/09/5401
• Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 991–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
• Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisitions, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.183
• Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159.
• Zollo, M., Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13, 339–351. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3086025