Reputation of multinational companiescorporate social responsibility and internationalization

  1. Aguilera-Caracuel, Javier 1
  2. Guerrero-Villegas, Jaime 2
  3. García-Sánchez, Encarnación 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

  2. 2 Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla
Revista:
European journal of management and business economics

ISSN: 2444-8494,  2444-8451

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 26

Número: 3

Páginas: 329-346

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1108/EJMBE-10-2017-019 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: European journal of management and business economics

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to use stakeholder theory as the theoretical reference framework to study the influence of internationalization (geographic international diversification) and social performance on multinational companies’ (MNCs) reputation. Design/methodology/approach The authors confirm the research hypotheses using a sample of 113 US MNCs in the chemical, energy and industrial machinery sectors during the period 2005-2010. Findings This study contributes to the literature in three ways. First, it incorporates literature on internationalization to study the possible connection between geographic international diversification and social performance in MNCs. Second, it sheds light on the debate between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the reputation of MNCs in a very diverse transnational context in which MNCs must meet the needs of stakeholders at both local and global levels. Third, it incorporates the mediating role of social performance in the relationship between geographic international diversification and the firm’s reputation. Originality/value Prior studies have hardly analyzed this relationship, which becomes especially relevant for MNCs, since their implementation of advanced CSR practices in the different markets in which they operate will gain them a good reputation, not only in specific local contexts but also globally, benefitting the organization as a whole and enabling it to gain internal consistency (improvement in internal efficiency), transparency and legitimacy.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • (2007), Academy of Management Review, 32, pp. 836, 10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
  • (2012), Journal of Business Ethics, 105, pp. 461, 10.1007/s10551-011-0978-7
  • (2015), Management International Review, 55, pp. 323, 10.1007/s11575-014-0225-4
  • (2013), Journal of Business Research, 66, pp. 2657, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.04.002
  • (2013), Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6, pp. 314, 10.1111/iops.12059
  • (2001), Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, pp. 622, 10.2307/3094826
  • (2007), Journal of Knowledge Management, 11, pp. 5, 10.1108/13673270710738889
  • (2005), Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, pp. 1, 10.5840/beq20051515
  • (2005), Strategic Management Journal, 26, pp. 197, 10.1002/smj.441
  • (2011), Social Responsibility Journal, 7, pp. 257, 10.1108/17471111111141521
  • (2016), European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25, pp. 8, 10.1016/j.redee.2015.11.002
  • (2000), Journal of Political Economy”, 108, pp. 379, 10.1086/262123
  • (1999), Academy of Management Journal, 42, pp. 488
  • (2007), Journal of Business Ethics, 76, pp. 35, 10.1007/s10551-006-9276-1
  • (2008), Corporate Reputation Review, 11, pp. 26
  • (2012), Journal of Business Ethics, 111, pp. 281, 10.1007/s10551-012-1208-7
  • (2005), Journal of Business Ethics, 61, pp. 29, 10.1007/s10551-005-7443-4
  • (2006), Journal of Management Studies, 43, pp. 435, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00597.x
  • (2006), Journal of Business Ethics, 69, pp. 111, 10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z
  • (2006), Journal of Management Studies, 43, pp. 1145, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00632.x
  • (2004), Academy of Management Journal, 47, pp. 747
  • (1995), The Academy of Management Review, 20, pp. 92, 10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
  • (2005), Signs, 30, pp. 1801, 10.1086/427525
  • (2010), Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization
  • (1997), Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14, pp. 421, 10.1108/07363769710185999
  • (2004), Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 15, pp. 27
  • (2006), Journal of Management, 32, pp. 329, 10.1177/0149206305280113
  • (1996), Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp. 1024, 10.5465/256722
  • (2005), Journal of Management Studies, 42, pp. 329, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x
  • (2003), Red Capitalists in China: The Party, Private Entrepreneurs, and Prospects for Political Change
  • (2007), Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14, pp. 16, 10.1002/csr.114
  • (2006), Business & Society, 45, pp. 93, 10.1177/0007650305285394
  • (1996), Reputation, Realizing Value from the Corporate Image
  • (2005), Corporate Reputation Review, 8, pp. 7, 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540235
  • (1990), Academy of Management Journal, 30, pp. 233
  • (2000), Journal of Brand Management, 7, pp. 241, 10.1057/bm.2000.10
  • (2004), Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, pp. 115, 10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115
  • (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
  • (2006), Academy of Management Review, 31, pp. 329, 10.5465/amr.2006.20208684
  • (2004), Journal of Business Ethics, 53, pp. 52
  • (2009), Journal of Business Ethics, 87, pp. 3
  • (2014), Journal of Business Ethics, 122, pp. 125, 10.1007/s10551-013-1753-8
  • (2009), Multivariate Analysis, 6th ed., Prentice Hall, Madrid.
  • (1997), Harvard Business Review, 75, pp. 66
  • (1978), Econometrica, 46, pp. 1251, 10.2307/1913827
  • (2013), An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach
  • (2010), Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, pp. 142, 10.1002/csr.225
  • (1996), Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, pp. 381, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0026
  • (1997), Academy of Management Journal, 40, pp. 767
  • (2010), Journal of Business Ethics, 93, pp. 181
  • (2005), Journal of Brand Management, 13, pp. 10, 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540243
  • (2005), International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1, pp. 277, 10.1504/IJBGE.2005.006733
  • (2013), Strategic Management Journal, 34, pp. 94, 10.1002/smj.2005
  • (2004), International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, pp. 203, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.003
  • (2010), International Business Review, 19, pp. 119
  • (2008), Academy of Management Review, 33, pp. 994, 10.5465/amr.2008.34422026
  • (2011), Journal of Management, 37, pp. 153, 10.1177/0149206310390963
  • (2006), Journal of Asian Economics, 17, pp. 50, 10.1016/j.asieco.2006.01.007
  • (2002), Business and Society, 41, pp. 446, 10.1177/0007650302238777
  • (2004), Journal of Marketing, 68, pp. 16, 10.1509/jmkg.68.4.16.42726
  • (2009), Journal of Business Ethics, 85, pp. 251, 10.1007/s10551-008-9732-1
  • (2011), Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 20, pp. 177
  • (2009), Journal of Marketing, 73, pp. 198, 10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198
  • (2001), Academy of Management Review, 26, pp. 117, 10.5465/amr.2001.4011987
  • (2016), Revista de Administração de Empresas, 56, pp. 20, 10.1590/S0034-759020160103
  • (2013), Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, pp. 168, 10.1002/csr.1283
  • (2012), Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, pp. 11, 10.1002/csr.260
  • (2010), International Journal of Advertising, 29, pp. 85, 10.2501/S026504870920104X
  • (2005), Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, pp. 429, 10.5840/beq200515329
  • (2013), Journal of World Business, 48, pp. 321, 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.016
  • (2015), Journal of World Business, 50, pp. 192, 10.1016/j.jwb.2014.04.007
  • (2014), International Business Review, 23, pp. 966, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.02.008
  • (2015), Journal of Business Ethics, 129, pp. 747, 10.1007/s10551-014-2212-x
  • (2009), Management Decision, 47, pp. 1261, 10.1108/00251740910984532
  • (2011), Strategic Management Journal, 32, pp. 969, 10.1002/smj.919
  • (2006), Harvard Business Review, 84, pp. 78
  • (2011), Harvard Business Review, 89, pp. 62
  • (2002), California Management Review, 45, pp. 6, 10.2307/41166151
  • (2004), Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, pp. 717, 10.3758/BF03206553
  • (2008), Behavior Research Methods, 40, pp. 879, 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  • (2006), Journal of International Business Studies, 37, pp. 733, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400229
  • (1998), Journal of International Business Studies, 29, pp. 115, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490028
  • (2013), Personnel Psychology, 66, pp. 895, 10.1111/peps.12030
  • (1997), Academy of Management Journal, 40, pp. 534
  • (2006), Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, pp. 158, 10.1177/0092070305284978
  • (2013), Management Science, 59, pp. 1045, 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630
  • (2006), Journal of International Business Studies, 37, pp. 850
  • Transparency International, (2004), TI Corruption Perceptions Index 2004
  • (2010), California Management Review, 52, pp. 52, 10.1525/cmr.2010.52.3.52
  • (2015), Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55, pp. 329, 10.1590/S0034-759020150308
  • (1997), Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp. 303, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G
  • (2010), Corporate Reputation Review, 12, pp. 357, 10.1057/crr.2009.26
  • (2009), Journal of Business Ethics, 88, pp. 433
  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2004), “Cross cutting themes: corporate responsibility”, available at: www.wbcsd.org (accessed September 2014)
  • (2009), Journal of Business Ethics, 86, pp. 155
  • (2004), International Marketing Review, 21, pp. 511, 10.1108/02651330410547171
  • (2004), Business and Society Review, 109, pp. 97, 10.1111/j.0045-3609.2004.00007.x
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet