The road to more sustainable firms in the face of a pandemicChanges needed in employment relationships

  1. Alvaro Lopez-Cabrales 1
  2. Angelo DeNisi 2
  1. 1 Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain
  2. 2 Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
Revista:
Business Research Quarterly

ISSN: 2340-9444 2340-9436

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 24

Número: 3

Páginas: 241-248

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Business Research Quarterly

Resumen

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way we operate at work. Dealing with these changes may require new ways of thinking about our models of employment relationships, to create more sustainable organizations during troubled times. Sustainability can be understood as an attempt to strike a balance between the economic, social and environmental goals of companies—a balance that could drive a global recovery from the pandemic crisis. This essay focuses on the employer’s perspective and considers how firms can use different employment models to improve sustainability during the crisis. We propose two alternative employment models which we label “Oversustainability” and “Mutual Sustainability” that depend on the choice of the firm’s competitive strategy (proactive/innovative vs analyzer/following). We considered the contributions expected from employees and the inducements they were offered under each model. We believe these employment models can be advantageous for companies seeking to adopt proactive and analyzer-type sustainability strategies.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-Oriented innovation: a systematic review. International Journal of Management Review, 18, 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068
  • Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–89.
  • Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & Van deWalle, D. (2003). Reflection on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29, 773–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0149-2063(03)00079-5
  • Bansal, P., Grewatsch, S., & Sharma, G. (2020). How COVID19 informs business sustainability research: It’s time for a systems perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 602–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12669
  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556363
  • Beltran-Martin, I., & Roca-Puig, V. (2013). Promoting employee flexibility through HR Practices. Human Resource Management, 52(5), 645–674.
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). Jossey-Bass.
  • Boxall, P. F. (2013). Building highly-performing work systems: Analysing HR systems and their contribution to performance. In J. Paauwe, D. Guest, & P. Wright (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 47– 59). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Carillo, K., Cachat-Rosset, G., Marsan, J., Saba, T., & Klarsfeld, A. (2020). Adjusting to epidemic-induced telework: Empirical insights from teleworkers in France. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 69–88. https://doi. org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1829512
  • Chinn, D., Sjatil, P. E., Stern, S., Tesfu, S., & Windhagen, E. (2020). Navigating the post-COVID-19 era: A strategic framework for European recovery. Mckinsey & Company.
  • DeNisi, A. S., & Smith, C. E. (2014). Performance appraisal, performance management, and firm-level performance: A review, a proposed model, and new directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 127–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873178
  • Díaz-Fernández, M., López-Cabrales, A., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2020). Strength of HRM systems and perceived organizational support as determinants of employment relationships: The perspective of HR managers and workers’ representatives. Business Research Quarterly, 1–15. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420977506
  • Dubois, C., & Dubois, D. (2012). Strategic human resource management as social design for environmental sustainability in organization. Human Resource Management, 51(6), 799– 826. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21504
  • Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainable human resource management. Springer.
  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society, Stoney Creek.
  • Guerci, M., Decramer, A., Van Waeyenberg, T., & Aust, I. (2018). Moving beyond the link between HRM and economic performance: A study on the individual reactions of HR managers and professionals to sustainable HRM. Journal of Business Ethics, 160, 783–800. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-018-3879-1
  • Guerci, M., & Pedrini, M. (2014). The consensus between Italian HR and sustainability managers on HR management for sustainability-driven change: Towards a “strong” HR management system. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(13), 1787–1814. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 9585192.2013.860388
  • Guest, D. E., & Conway, N. (2002). Communicating the psychological contract: An employer perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(2), 22–38. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2002.tb00062.x
  • Jabbour, C. J., & Santos, F. C. A. (2008). The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 2133–2154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585 190802479389
  • Jia, L., Shaw, J. D., Tsui, A. S., & Park, T. Y. (2014). A socialstructural perspective on employee-organization relationships and team creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 869–891.
  • Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. S. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: Historical review, meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. https://doi. org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
  • Lopez-Cabrales, A., & Valle-Cabrera, A. (2020). Sustainable HRM strategies and employment relationships as drivers of the triple bottom line. Human Resource Management Review, 48, 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100689
  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations (SSRN scholarly paper no. ID 1496194). Social Science Research Network.
  • Mariappanadar, S. (2003). Sustainable human resource strategy: The sustainable and unsustainable dilemmas of retrenchment. International Journal of Social Economics, 30(8), 906–923. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290310483779
  • Martinez-del-Rio, J., Cespedes-Lorente, J., & Carmona-Moreno, E. (2012). High-involvementwork practices and environmental capabilities: How HIWPS create environmentally based sustainable competitive advantages. Human Resource Management, 51(6), 827–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm. 21505
  • Merriman, K. K., & Sen, S. (2012). Incenting managers toward the triple bottom line: An agency and social norm perspective. Human Resource Management, 51, 851–871. https:// doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21491
  • Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1984). Designing strategic human resources systems. Organizational Dynamics, 13, 36–52.
  • Pulakos, E. D. (2004). Performance management: A roadmap for developing, implementing, and evaluating performance management systems. Society for Human Resource Management.
  • Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). ‘New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts.’ Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030110506
  • Santana, M., & Lopez-Cabrales, A. (2019). Sustainable development and human resource management: A science mapping approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 1171–1183. https://doi. org/10.1002/csr.1765
  • Sawang, S., & Kivits, R. A. (2014). Greener workplace: Understanding senior management’s adoption decisions through the theory of planned behaviour. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 21(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2013.848418
  • Sewell, G., & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1507– 1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615593587
  • Stone, L. J. (2000). When case studies are not enough: The influence of corporate culture and employee attitudes on the success of cleaner production initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 8, 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00037-8
  • Torka, N., Looise, J. K., & van Riemsdijk, M. (2005). Commitment and the new employment relationship: Exploring a forgotten perspective: Employers commitment. Management Revue, 16(4), 525–539.
  • Tsui, A., Pearce, J., Porter, L., & Tripoli, A. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employee pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1089–1121. https://doi.org/10.5465/256928
  • Tsui, A. S., & Wu, J. B. (2005). The new employment relationship versus the mutual investment approach: Implications for human resource management.” Human Resource Management, 44, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20052
  • Ulrich, D., Younger, J., Brockbank, W., & Ulrich, M. (2012). HR talent and the new HR competencies. Strategic HR Review, 11(4), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/1475 4391211234940
  • Wang, D., Tsui, A. S., Zhang, W., & Ma, L. (2003). Employment relationships and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 511–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.213
  • Wehrmeyer, W. (1996). Greening people: Human resource and environmental management. Greenleaf.
  • Yong, J., & Mohd-Yusoff, Y. (2016). Studying the influence of strategic human resource competencies on the adoption of green human resource management practices. Industrial and Commercial Training, 48(8), 416–422. https://doi. org/10.1108/ICT-03-2016-0017