El trabajo de enfermería en la provincia de Madrid durante el confinamiento por la Covid-19contexto y experiencias

  1. Peiró Salvador, Teresa 1
  2. Vera Perea, María 2
  3. Lorente Prieto, Laura 3
  1. 1 Doctora en Biomedicina y Farmacia. Departamento de Enfermería, Universidad de València
  2. 2 Doctora en Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones. Departamento de Educación y Psicología Social, Universidad Pablo de Olavide
  3. 3 Doctora en Psicología. Departamento de Psicología Social, Universidad de València.
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Conocimiento Enfermero

ISSN: 2605-3152

Year of publication: 2021

Issue Title: Conocimiento Enfermero

Volume: 4

Issue: 12

Pages: 70-82

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Conocimiento Enfermero

Abstract

Covid-19 has triggered a health crisis with multiple social and economic consequences. The health system has been overflowed and has subjected health professionals to high demands. This study aims to analyze the stress experiences of nurses from the province of Madrid during the lock-down period in Spain. The stress appraisal, personal and social resources, the coping strategies, as well as the performance and mental health are analyzed. This is a transversal survey study using validated measures, with data from a sample of 124 nurses from Madrid and 314 from other parts of Spain. The strongest appraised stressors have been fear of contagion and emotional burden due to patient suffering and death. Moreover, the nurses report important levels of emotional support and show good levels of resilience. Concerning coping strategies, ‘problem focused’ predominates, although there are also high levels of emotional support and acceptance. Regarding mental health indicators, the surveyed nurses show higher levels of tension and anxiety than those of depressive state. Moreover, they report high levels of performance and citizenship behavior with their workmates. The correlation indexes show a positive relation between the levels of stress and mental health problems. Moreover, performance and citizenship behavior with workmates show a negative relation with the mental health indicators. Lastly, coping strategies present a positive relation with personal resources (self-efficacy and resilience) but just in the case of acceptance presents a significant relation with performance and mental health. Lastly, the comparison of these results from the nurses of Madrid with the sample from other parts of Spain shows few significant differences.

Bibliographic References

  • Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment. 1998. 10, 176-181. Doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176
  • Bados A, Solanas A, Andrés R. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). Psicothema. 2005. 17, 679-683.
  • Baessler J, Schwarcer R. Evaluación de la autoeficacia: Adaptación española de la escala de Autoeficacia General. Ansiedad y Estrés, 1996. 2, 1-8.
  • Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job demands-resources theory. In Wellbeing: A complete reference guide. Work and wellbeing; Chen P.Y., Cooper C.L. (Eds.); Wiley-Blackwell – 2014. United Kingdom, (pp. 37–64).
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. 1997. Nueva York: Freeman.
  • Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1997. 4(1), 92-100. Doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6
  • Escribá V, Mas R, Cárdenas M, Pérez S. Validity of a job stressors measurement scale in nursing staff: the nursing stress scale. Gac Sanit. 1999. 13(3), 191-200. Doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(99)71350-6.
  • Grau R, Salanova M, Peiró JM. Efectos moduladores de la autoeficacia en el estrés laboral. Apuntes de Psicología. 2000. 18, 1, 57-75.
  • Gray-Toft P, Anderson JG. The Nursing Stress Scale: Development of an instrument. Journal of Behavioural Assessment. 1981. 3(1), 11-23.
  • Klieve HM, Beamish W, Bryer FK, Rebollo RE, Perrett HO, Van Den Muyzenberg J. Accessing practitioner expertise through online survey tool LimeSurvey. Knowledge in Technology Education (TERC 2010). 2010. 2
  • Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. Nueva York: Springer Publishing Company. 1984.
  • Morán C, Landero R, González MT. COPE-28: un análisis psicométrico de la versión en español del Brief COPE. Universitas Psychologica. 2010. 9 (2), 543-552.
  • Peiró JM, Salvador A. Estrés Laboral y su control. Madrid: Endema. 1993.
  • Richardson GE. The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2002. 58, 3, 307-321. Doi: 10.1002/jclp.10020.
  • Smith CA, Organ DW, Near JP. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature and Antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1983. 68 (4), 653-663.
  • Stephens JP, Heaphy E, Dutton JE. High quality connections. In Cameron, K. S., Spreitzer, G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 385-399). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2011.
  • Williams LJ, Anderson SE. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management. 1991. 17, 601–617. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
Data source: Dialnet