Cyber-activism Against Sexual Violence#BringBackOurGirls

  1. González Ramos, Ana M.
Journal:
Debats: Revista de cultura, poder i societat

ISSN: 0212-0585,  2530-3074

Year of publication: 2020

Issue: 5

Pages: 233-244

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Debats: Revista de cultura, poder i societat

Abstract

Over the last few years, many successful campaigns have both denounced women’s vulnerabilities and protested against gender violence. The success of these campaigns can be gauged by the number of their followers, spreading the message and involving celebrities and agencies around the world. Those campaigns have put gender inequality and women’s protests against sexual abuse firmly on the agenda. However, this still raises questions as to both the limits to and opportunities for cyber-activism in general and in war-torn areas in particular. This paper addresses the influence of digital campaigns against sexual violence, exploring the impact of the #BringBackOurGirls campaign, which covers the kidnapping of a large group of girls in Nigeria by the Boko Haram terrorist group. Among other things, we find that the campaign narrowly focuses on a group (‘The Chibok Girls’), ignoring the vulnerability of many other girls and young women in Nigeria.

Bibliographic References

  • Anderlini, S. N. (2018). Challenging Conventional Wisdom, Transforming Current Practices: A Gendered Lens on PVE, Transforming Current Practice. In B. Austin and H. Giessmann Berghof (ed.) (2018), Transformative Approaches to Violent Extremism. Berlin: Berghof Foundation.
  • Asamblea General de la ONU (2001). Protocolos facultativos de la Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño relativos a la participación de niños en los conflictos armados y a la venta de niños, la prostitución infantil y la utilización de niños en la pornografía. A / RES / 54/263. June 16, 2015. https://undocs.org/es/A/RES/54/263
  • Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Bent, E. (2016). Making It Up Intergenerational Activism and the Ethics of Empowering Girls. Girlhood Studies, 9 (3), 105-121. DOI: 10.3167 / ghs.2016.090308
  • Bloom, M. (2011). Bombshell: Women and Terrorists, London: Hurst.
  • Botha, A. and Abdile, M. (2019). Reality Versus Perception: Toward Understanding Boko Haram in Nigeria. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 42 (5), 493-519. DOI: 10.1080 / 1057610X.2018.1403152
  • Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Bunch, C. (2001). Women’s Human Rights: The Challenges of Global Feminist and Diversity. In M. Dekoven (ed.) (2001), Feminist Locations: Global and Local, Theory and Practice (p. 129-146). New Brunswick: Rutgers.
  • Bustillos, J. (2017). The Case of Tumblr: Young People’s Mediatized Responses to the Crisis of Learning about Gender at School. In B. Revelles-Benavente and A. M. González Ramos (ed.), Teaching Gender: Feminist Pedagogy and Responsibility in Times of Political Crisis (p. 163-177). London: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (2009). Frames of War: When is Life Grievable? New York: Verse.
  • Carter Olson, C. (2016). #BringBackOurGirls: Digital Communities Supporting Real-World Change and Influencing Mainstream Media Agendas. Feminist Media Studies, 16 (5), 772-787. DOI: 10.1080 / 14680777.2016.1154887
  • Castells, M. (2011). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Boston (MA): Polity Press.
  • Cockburn, C. (1998). The Space Between Us: Negotiating Gender and National Identities in Conflict. London and New York: Zed Book.
  • Coleman, R. (2018). Theorizing the Present: Digital Media, Pre-emergence and Infra-structures of Feeling. Cultural Studies, 32 (3), 1-23. DOI: 10.1080 / 09502386.2017.1413121
  • Comolli, V. (2015). Boko Haram: Nigeria’s Islamism Insurgency. London: Hurst & Company.
  • Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU (2015). Resolution 222. June 18, 2015. https://undocs.org/es/S/RES/2225(2015)
  • Cox, K., Marcellino, W., Bellasio, J., Ward, A., Galai, K., Meranto, S., et al. (November 4, 2018). Social Media in Africa: A Double-Edged Sword for Security and Development. United Nations Development Program. https://www.africa. undp.org/content/rba/en/home/library/reports/social-media-in-africa-.html
  • Enloe, C. (1989). Bananas, Beaches, Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, London: Pandora Press.
  • Escola de Cultura de Pau (2019). Alert 2019! Report on Conflicts, Human Rights and Peacebuilding. Barcelona: Icaria.
  • Friedman, E. (2016). Interpreting the Internet: Feminist and Queer Counterpublics in Latin America. California: University of California Press.
  • Garrett, K. (2006). Protest in an Information Society: A Review of Literature on Social Movements and New ICTs. Information, Communication and Society, 9 (2), 202-224. DOI: 10.1080 / 13691180600630773
  • Hooks, B. (1986). Ain’t I a Woman?: Black Women’s Rights Feminism. London: Pluto Press.
  • Khoja-Moolji, S. (2015). Becoming an ‘Intimate Publics’: Exploring the Affective Intensities of Hashtag Feminism. Feminist Media Studies, 15 (2), 347-350. DOI: 10.1080 / 14680777.2015.1008747
  • Magallón Portolés, C. (2010). Decidir en los procesos de paz, un derecho de hombres y mujeres. ¿Qué ha aportado la resolución 1325 del Consejo de Seguridad? Papeles de relaciones ecosociales y cambio global,109, 45-56.
  • Magallón Portolés, C. (2020). El extremismo violento: un reto para el feminismo pacifista. Debats: Revista de cultura, poder y sociedad,, 134 (2), 15-28. DOI: http://doi.org/10.28939/iam.debats-134-2.2.
  • Mahmood, O. S. (March 28, 2017). More than Propaganda: A Review of Boko Haram’s Public Messages. In ISS -Institute for Security Studies, West Africa Report. https://issafrica.org/research/west-africa-report/more-than-propagandaa-review-of-boko-harams-public-messages
  • Mandrona, A. (2016). Ethical practice and the Study of Girlhood. Girlhood Studies, 9 (3), 3-19. DOI: 10.3167 / ghs.2016.090302
  • Matfess, H. (2017). Women and the War on Boko Haram: Wives, Weapons, Witnesses. London: Zed Book.
  • Maxfield, M. (2016). History Retweeting Itself: Imperial Feminist Appropriations of ‘Bring Back Our Girls’. Feminist Media Studies, 16 (5), 886-900. DOI: 10.1080 / 14680777.2015.1116018
  • Mayah, E., Mariotti, C., Mere, E. and Okwudili Odo, C. (2017). Inequality in Nigeria: Exploring the Drivers. Oxfam International. https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/inequality-nigeria-exploring-drivers
  • Mitchell, C. (2017). Technological Nonviolence and Girls: Creating a Counter Discourse. Girlhood Studies, 10 (2), 5-6. DOI: 10.3167 / ghs.2017.100201.
  • Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Boundary 2, 12 (3), 333- 358. DOI: 10.1007 / 978-1-137-07412-6_5.
  • Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Cartographies of Struggle: Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. In Mohanty, C. T. (ed.) (1991). Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism (p. 51-80). Bloomington: Indiana Press.
  • Ordu, G. E. (2017). Trends and Patterns of Boko Haram Terrorist and Militants’ Aggression in Nigeria. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 35-41. DOI: 10.1016 / j.avb.2017.08.006
  • Ponzanesi, S. (ed.) (2014). Gender, Globalization, and Violence Postcolonial Conflict Zones. New York: Routledge.
  • Ringrose, J. and Eriksson, K. (2011). Gendered Risks and Opportunities? Exploring Teen Girls ’Digital Sexual Identity in Postfeminist Media Contexts. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 7 (2), 121-138. DOI: 0.1386 / macp.7.2.121_1
  • Riles, A. (2002). Rights Inside Out: The Case of the Women’s Human Rights Campaign. Leiden Journal of International Law, 15 (2), 285-305. DOI: 10.1017 / S0922156502000146
  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13 (3), 193-209. DOI: 10.1177 / 1350506806065752
Data source: Dialnet