El perfilado estadístico como instrumento para la evaluación del impacto del programa Incorpora

  1. Casanova, Jorge 1
  2. Felgueroso, Florentino 2
  3. García Pérez, José Ignacio 3
  4. Jiménez-Martín, Sergi 4
  1. 1 Compass Lexecon y FEDEA
  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo y FEDEA
  3. 3 Universidad Pablo de Olavide y FEDEA
  4. 4 Universitat Pompeu Fabra y FEDEA
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Cuadernos económicos de ICE

ISSN: 0210-2633

Year of publication: 2021

Issue Title: La evaluación de las políticas públicas en España: recursos, metodologías y algunos ejemplos

Issue: 102

Pages: 189-220

Type: Article

DOI: 10.32796/CICE.2021.102.7316 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Cuadernos económicos de ICE

Abstract

In this article, we present a causal evaluation exercise in the context of statistical profiling applied to an employment program created by La Caixa Foundation and called Incorpora. This program consists of a mechanism of support and repositioning in the labor market of people at risk of exclusion. Our results suggest that the training given within the program contributes to a general improvement in the average employability of the participants in the program, but it is observed that this effect declines with unemployment duration. On the other hand, we find that the Incorpora program improves the probability of finding and retaining employment as well as the time worked and even the salary once re-employed for all the groups analyzed regardless of gender, nationality, previous sector of employment or previous work experience. Specifically, employability increases between 3 and 4 percentage points thanks to the program and the effect on the number of months accumulated in employment is situated, depending on the cohort, between 3 and 4 months three years after leaving it.

Bibliographic References

  • Arellano, F. A. (2010). Do training programmes get the unemployed back to work? A look at the Spanish experience. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 18(53), 39-65.
  • Card, D., Kluve, J., & Weber, A. (2018). What works? A meta analysis of recent active labor market program evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(3), 894- 931.
  • Desiere, S., Langenbucher, K., & Struyven, L. (2019). Statistical Profiling in Public Employ ment Services: An international comparison. OECD Social, Employment and Migration (Working Paper No. 224).
  • Epanechnikov, V. A. (1969). Non-parametric estimation of a multivariate probability density. Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 14(1), 153-158.
  • Felgueroso, F., García-Pérez, J. I., & Jiménez-Martín, S. Perfilado estadístico: un método para diseñar políticas activas de empleo. FEDEA y Fundación Ramón Areces.
  • García-Pérez, J. I. (2008). La muestra continua de vidas laborales: una guía de uso para el análisis de transiciones. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 16(1), 5-28.
  • Goodman-Bacon, A. (2018). Difference-in-difference with variation in treatment timing. NBER, National Bureau of Economic Research (Working Paper Series No. 25018).
  • Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods that Incorporate the Propensity Score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33-38.
Data source: Dialnet