Una sola métrica no cuenta toda la historia de la producción científica. II. Publicación
-
1
Universidad de Sevilla
info
ISSN: 2444-7986, 2444-7986
Year of publication: 2016
Volume: 7
Volume: 3
Pages: 151-162
Type: Article
More publications in: Revista ORL
Abstract
Introduction: There are different strategies for scientific publication that can be addressed from the perspective of the publication itself, quality of publications and metrics for evaluation. Method: Narrative review. Results: Description of existing methods for detecting evidence of quality publications and metrics at different levels that have generated traditional and alternative sources at the level of individual contribution, publication, author and institutions. They are considered both traditional metrics such as altmétricas called. Conclusions: Given the variety of metrics offered by providers of electronic resources, researchers must know their existence and characteristics, how to obtain and interpret them to demonstrate the quality of their publications to third parties.
Bibliographic References
- Cardona-Grau D, Sorokin I, Leinwand G, Welliver C. Introducing the Twitter Impact Factor: An Objective Measure of Urology’s Academic Impact on Twitter. Eur Urol Focus [Internet]. 2016 Apr [Citado el 13 de abril de 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405456916300086
- Roemer RC, Borchardt R. Meaningful metrics: A 21st century librarian’s guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics, and research impact [Internet]. Chicago, Illinois: Association of College and Research Libraries; 2015. Disponible en: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/booksanddigitalresources/digital/9780838987568_metrics_OA.pdf