Una sola métrica no cuenta toda la historia de la producción científica. I. Visibilidad

  1. GONZÁLEZ-FERNÁNDEZ-VILLAVICENCIO, Nieves 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

Journal:
Revista ORL

ISSN: 2444-7986,  2444-7986

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 7

Volume: 3

Pages: 143-149

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14201/ORL201673.14444 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista ORL

Abstract

Introduction: There are different strategies for scientific publication that can be addressed from the perspective of visibility, contemplating the uniformity of the firm and author profiles. Method: Narrative review Results: recommendations for the implementation of the author's signature and description of each of the profiles existing in both traditional resources as altmetrics author. Conclusions: scientific researchers must know the visibility strategies described in this article in order to improve recovery of its publications, increase the impact of its production and achieve greater visibility and connection with other researchers through the author profiles.

Bibliographic References

  • Alperin JP, Bordini A. Cómo llegar a una mayor audiencia para su investigación - SciDev.Net América Latina y el Caribe [Internet]. SciDev.Net. 2015 [Citado el 30 de abril de 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.scidev.net/america-latina/comunicacion/guia-practica/como-llegar-a-una-mayor-audiencia-para-su-investigacion.html
  • Calderón-Rehecho A. Boudiya: un investigador singular. XII Foro Internacional sobre la evaluación de la calidad de la investigación y de la educación superior [Internet]. Sevilla; 2015. [Citado el 30 de abril de 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.ugr.es/~aepc/XIIFECIESWEB/CV/CV_25.html.
  • Konkiel S, Sugimoto CR, Williams S. The use of Altmetrics in promotion and tenure. Educ Rev. 2016:54–5. [Citado el 9 de junio de 2016]. Disponible en: http://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/3/the-use-of-altmetrics-in-promotion-and-tenure.
  • Martín AM, Ordu-a-Malea E, López-Cózar ED. The role of ego in academic profile services: Comparing Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Mendeley, and ResearcherID [Internet]. Blog Impactofsocialsciences. 2016. [Citado el 30 de abril de 2016]. Disponible en: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/03/04/academic-profile-services-many-mirrors-and-faces-for-a-single-ego/.
  • Ortega JL. Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC's members. J Informetr [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2015;9(1):39–49. [Citado el 30 de abril de 2016]. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004.
  • Roemer RC, Borchardt R. Meaningful metrics: A 21st century librarian's guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics, and research impact [Internet]. Chicago, Illinois: Association of College and Research Libraries; 2015. [Citado el 30 de abril de 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/booksanddigitalresources/digital/9780838987568_metrics_OA.pdf.
  • Schnitzler K, Davies N, Ross F, Harris R. Using TwitterTM to Drive Research Impact: A Discussion of Strategies, Opportunities and Challenges. Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2016;59:15–26. [Citado el 30 de abril de 2016]. Disponible en: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020748916000729
  • Thelwall M, Kousha K, Dinsmore A, Dolby K. Alternative metric indicators for funding scheme evaluations. Aslib J Inf Manag [Internet]. 2016;68(1):2–18. [Citado el 30 de abril de 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/AJIM-09-2015-0146.
Data source: Dialnet