El 15 MDe vuelta al barrio como espacio político

  1. García Espín, Patricia
Journal:
Revista internacional de pensamiento político

ISSN: 1885-589X

Year of publication: 2012

Issue: 7

Pages: 291-310

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista internacional de pensamiento político

Abstract

In this article, we analyze the 15M movement, "Indignad@s" , from the point of view of its organizational practices based on the community, decentralization and horizontality. Beyond the contextual factors, the precedents and the political discourses which framed the process of protest-building, the literature has not paid attention enough to the organizational products of the mobilization: the Community and Neigh- borhood Assemblies . These assemblies, which exist in the main cities of Andalucía, are community-oriented, horizontal and use grassroots struc- tures, but they face deep problems related to coordination and social inequality. Despite these shortcomings, the 15M assemblies have re-discovered the neighborhood and the community as the space for collective action.

Bibliographic References

  • Baiocchi, G. 2005. Militants and Citizens: Local Democracy on a Global Stage in Porto Alegre, Stanford University Press, CA.
  • Baiocchi, G, Heller and Silva. 2011. Bootstrapping Democracy, Stanford University Press, CA.
  • Barber, B. 2004. Democracia Fuerte: Política Participativa para Una Nueva Época, Córdoba: Almuzara.
  • Bourdieu, P. y Passeron, J. C. 2005. La Reproducción: elementos para una teoría del sistema de enseñanza, Fontamara.
  • Brown, W. 2010. “Ahora todos somos demócratas”. Agamben et al., Democracia en Suspenso, Madrid: Casus Belli.
  • Bryan, F. 2004. Real Democracy, The New England Town Meeting and How It Works, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Burkhalter S., Gastil J. y Kershaw T. 2002. “A Conceptual Defi nition and Theoricical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face-to-Face Groups”, Communication Theory, 12.
  • Calle, A. 2003. “Los nuevos movimientos globales”. Papeles de la CEIC 7.
  • Calle, A. 2005. “Nuevos movimientos globales. Tiempos de refl ujo y sedimentación”. Pedro Ibarra Güell, Elena Grau (coord.), La política en la red: anuario de movimientos sociales.
  • Calle, A. 2007. “El Estudio del Impacto de los Movimientos Sociales. Una perspectiva Global”.REIS 120/07, pp. 133-153.
  • Cánfora, L. 2004. La Democracia: Historia de Una Ideología, Barcelona: Crítica.
  • Castells, “Internet y la Sociedad Red”, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Lliçó inaugural del programa de doctorat sobre la societat de la informació i el coneixement, http://www.uoc.edu/web/cat/articles/ castells/m_castells8.html.
  • Castells, M. 2002. La Era de la Información, Vol. 1, La Sociedad en Red, México, S. XXI.
  • Cramer Walsh, K. 2012. “Putting inequality in its Place: Rural Consciousness and the Power of Perspective, American Political Science Review, Vol. 106, Issue 03, August, pp. 517-532.
  • Dahl & Tufte, E R. 1973. Size and Democracy, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  • Dahl, R. 1967. “The City in the Future of Democracy”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, Dec.
  • Dahl, R. 1992. La Democracia y sus Críticos, Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Dahl, R. 1994. “A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 109, No. 1 (spring, 1994), pp. 23-34.
  • Della Porta D. 2009. Democracy in Social Movements. Houndsmill: Palgrave.
  • Della Porta, D, y Diani, M. 2011. Los movimientos Sociales, Madrid: CIS y Editorial Complutense.
  • Della Porta, D., Mosca, L. y Smith, J. 2007. Global Democracy and The World Social Forum, Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
  • Díaz Parra, I. Víctor Fernández Salinas, Francisco Jose Torres Gutierrez, Federico Brivio, Ventura Galera. 2011. El Distrito Macarena de Sevilla. Sevilla. Dirección General de Coordinación de Políticas Migratorias. Junta de Andalucía.
  • Domènech, A. 2004. El Eclipse de la Fraternidad, Barcelona: Crítica.
  • Eliasoph, N, XXXX. “Moral and Political Ethnography.” Working Paper available in her website.
  • Eliasoph, N. 1990. “Political Culture and the Presentation of a Political Self. A study of the public in the spirit of Erving Goffman”, Theory and Society 19: 465-494.
  • Eliasoph, N. 1996. “Making a Fragile Public: A Talk-Centered Study of Citizenship and Power”, Sociological Theory, 14: 3 November.
  • Eliasoph, N. 1997. “«Close to Home»: The Work of Avoiding Politics”, Theory and Society, 26: 605-647.
  • Eliasoph, N. 1999. “What if good citizens’ ettiquete requires silencing political conversation in Everyday Life? Notes from the Field”.
  • Escalera Reyes, J. y Ruiz Ballesteros, E. 2006. Asociacionismo vecinal en las ciudades medias andaluzas, Revista de Estudios Andaluces Nº 26, pp. 37-66.
  • Fernández Salinas, V., Rodríguez, V., et al. 2009. “El asentamiento de población inmigrante extranjera en el distrito Macarena de Sevilla: Análisis y diagnóstico de los procesos de transformación urbana y social”. Mimeo, Sevilla : Junta de Andalucía / Universidad de Sevilla.
  • Font y Alarcón, P. 2012 “¿Cómo queremos que se tomen las decisiones políticas?”, Laboratorio de Alternativas, 2012/12.
  • Freeman, J. 1972. “The Tyranny of Structurelessness”, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Fukuyama, F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. NY: Free Press.
  • Ganuza, E. and Sintomer, Y. 2011. Democracia Participativa y Modernización de los Servicios Públicos, e-Books.
  • Garzón Espinosa, A. 2011. “Evolución de los Salarios en España” (1978-2010), Blog Pijus Económicus: http://www.agarzon.net/?p=949. (06-07-2012)
  • Gastil, J. 1993. Small Group Democracy, Philaderphia: New Society Publishers.
  • Gerlach, L. P. 1999. “The Structure of Social Movements: Environmental Activism and Its Opponents”, in Jo Freeman and Victoria Johnson, Waves of Protests, Boston: Rowman and Littlefi eld Publishers.
  • Gramsci, A. 2011. La cultura popular, Valencia: PUV.
  • Habermas, J. 1986. Historia y crítica de la opinión pública. La transformación estructural de la vida pública, Barcelona: Ed. Gustavo Gili, [1962]
  • Hibbings, J. R. and Theiss-Morse E. 2005. Stealth Democracy, Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hobsbawn, E. 2010. Rebeldes Primitivos, Barcelona: Crítica.
  • Ibarra Güell, P. (ed.). 2003. Social Move- ments and Democracy, Houndsmill: PalgraveMcMillan.
  • Katz y Meir (2004): “El Partido Cartel. La transformación de los modelos de partidos y de la democracia de partidos”, Zona Abierta, 108/109.
  • Taibo, C.: Que no se apague la luz: un diario de campo del 15M, Los Libros de la Catarata, 2012.
  • Iglesias, P. and Errejon I. 2005. “The New Spartakists. The thought of Rosa Lux- emburg to understand the Global Move- ment”. Barker, C. and Tyldesley, M. (eds.) Alternative Futures and Popular Protest. Conference Papers Supplementary Volume. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University.
  • Javaloy, Espelt y Rodríguez. 2010. “Internet y Movimientos Sociales. Un enfoque psico-social”, Universitat de Barcelona. En Internet: http://www.ub.edu/dppss/lps/ mov_soc.htm.
  • Laclau, E. 2005. La Razón Populista, Buenos Aires: FCE.
  • Manin, B. 1998. Los Principios del Gobierno Representativo, Madrid: Alianza
  • Mansbridge, J. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • McLuhan, M. 1968. Guerra y Paz en la Aldea Global.
  • Meiksins Wood, E. 1995. Democracy Against Capitalism, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Meiksins Wood, E. 2012. From Citizens To Lords, A History of Western Political Thought, NY: Verso Books.
  • Montero, Font y Torcal, M. 2006. Ciudadanos, asociaciones y participación en España, Madrid: CIS.
  • Mouffe, C. 1993. The return of the political. New York: Verso.
  • Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox, Neew York: Verso.
  • Muntz, D. 2006. Hearing the other side. Deliberative vs. Participatory Democracy. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Neblo, M. et al. 2010. “Who Wants to DeliberateAnd Why?”.-American Political Science Review, Vol. 104 N. 3, August.
  • Pateman, C. 1975. Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge University Press.
  • Rebughini, P. 2010. “Critique and Social Movements: Looking beyond contingency and nomativity”. -European journal of Social Theory 13.
  • Salter, L. 2003. “Democracy, New Social Movements and The Internet”, in Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice, London: Routledge.
  • Sampedro Blanco, V. 2005. 13-M: multitudes on line, Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata.
  • Sartori, G. 2005. Teoría de la Democracia, Madrid: Alianza.
  • Schkade, D. Sunstein, C., Reid, H. 2010. “When Deliberation Produces Extremism”, Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, Vol. 22, No. 2., pp. 227-252
  • Shumpeter, J. 1996. Capitalismo, Socialismo y Democracia, Folio.
  • Smith, J. 2001. “Globalizing resistance: The battle of Seattle and the future of so- cial movements”.Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 6(1), pp.1–19.
  • Staw y Sutton (eds.) 2000. Research in Organizacional Behaviour, Vol. 22, Elsevier, NY.
  • Strang, D, and Soule, S. 1999. “Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills”, Annual Review of Sociology, 1998.24:265-290.
  • Swingedow, E. 2008. “Where is the political?”.Annual Conference of the AAG, Boston.
  • Talpin, J. 2011. Schools of democracy. How ordinary citizens (sometimes) become competent in participatory budgeting institutions, ECPR Press, Colchester.
  • Tarrow, S. 2004. El poder en movimiento: los movimientos sociales, la acción colectiva y la política. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Tilly, C. 1986. The contentious French. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press.
  • Zizek, S. 1999. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso.
  • Zizek, S. 2007. En defensa de la intolerancia. Madrid: Sequitur.
Data source: Dialnet