The conventionality of simultaneity in Einstein’s practical chrono-geometry

  1. Mario Bacelar Valente
Revista:
Theoria: an international journal for theory, history and foundations of science

ISSN: 0495-4548

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 32

Número: 2

Páginas: 177-190

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1387/THEORIA.17183 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Theoria: an international journal for theory, history and foundations of science

Resumen

Pese a que Einstein consideraba que sub specie aeterni el convencionalismo era la posición filosófica correcta respecto a la geometría, él pensaba que provisionalmente era necesario adoptar una posición no convencionalista a la que llamó geometría práctica. Aquí, defendemos la posición de que aunque se adopten las ideas de Einstein tenemos que concluir que la geometría práctica es convencional. Einstein no tuvo en cuenta el hecho de que la convencionalidad de la simultaneidad lleva a un elemento convencional en la chrono-geometría, pues corresponde a la posibilidad de distintas métricas del espacio-tiempo (que son equivalentes a nivel observacional, cuando se cambia adecuadamente la “parte física” de la teoría).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, Ronald, Vetharaniam, I., and Stedman, Geoffrey. 1998. Conventionality of synchronization, gauge dependence and test theories of relativity. Physics Reports, 295: 93-180.
  • Bacelar Valente, Mario. 2017. Einstein’s physical chronogeometry. Manuscrito. Revista Internacional de Filosofia, 40: 241-278.
  • Darrigol, Olivier. 2015. Mesh and measure in early general relativity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 52: 163-187.
  • Edwards, W. F. 1963. Special relativity in anisotropic space. American Journal of Physics, 31: 482-489.
  • Einstein, Albert. 1905. On the electrodynamics of moving bodies. In CPAE (English translation), Vol. 2, pp. 140-171.
  • Einstein, Albert. 1912. Manuscript on special relativity. In CPAE (English translation), Vol. 4, pp. 3-88.
  • Einstein, Albert. 1914. The formal foundations of the general theory of relativity. In CPAE (English translation), Vol. 6, pp. 30-84.
  • Einstein, Albert. 1916. The foundation of the general theory of relativity. In CPAE (English translation), Vol. 6, pp. 147-200.
  • Einstein, Albert. 1917. On the special and general theory of relativity. In CPAE (English translation), Vol. 6, pp. 247-420.
  • Einstein, Albert. 1920. Fundamental ideas and methods of the theory of Relativity, presented in their development. In CPAE (English translation), Vol. 7, pp. 113-150.
  • Einstein, Albert. 1921. Geometry and experience. In CPAE (English translation), Vol. 7, pp. 208-222.
  • Einstein, Albert. 1923. Fundamental ideas and problems of the theory of relativity. In CPAE (English translation), Vol. 14, pp. 74-81.
  • Einstein, Albert. 1924. Review of Alfred C. Elsbach, Kant und Einstein. In CPAE (English translation), Vol. 14, pp. 322-327.
  • Einstein, Albert. 1949a. Autobiographical notes. In P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. New York: MJF Books, 1970, pp. 1-94.
  • Einstein, Albert. 1949b. Remarks concerning the essays brought together in this co-operative volume. In P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. New York: MJF Books, 1970, pp. 665-688.
  • Giannoni, Carlo. 1978. Relativistic mechanics and electrodynamics without one-way velocity assumptions. Philosophy of Science, 45: 17-46.
  • Giovanelli, Marco. 2013. Talking at cross-purposes: how Einstein and the logical empiricists never agreed on what they were disagreeing about. Synthese, 190: 3819-3863.
  • Giovanelli, Marco. 2014. But one must not legalize the mentioned sin: phenomenological vs. dynamical treatments of rods and clocks in Einstein’s thought. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 48: 20-44.
  • Friedman, Michael. 2002. Geometry as a branch of physics: background and context for Einstein’s “geometry and experience”. In D. B. Malament (ed.), Reading natural philosophy. Essays in the history and philosophy of science and mathematics. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 193-229.
  • Grünbaum, Adolf. 1955. Logical and philosophical foundations of the special theory of relativity. American Journal of Physics, 23: 450-464.
  • Grünbaum, Adolf. 1959. Conventionalism in geometry. In L. Henkin, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Proceedings of the symposium on the axiomatic method, with special reference to geometry and physics. Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  • Grünbaum, Adolf. 1962. Geometry, chronometry, and empiricism. In H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Scientific explanation, space, and time. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol. III. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Grünbaum, Adolf. 1968. Geometry and chronometry in philosophical perspective. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Howard, Don. 1990. Einstein and Duhem. Synthese, 83: 363-384.
  • Howard, Don. 2010. “Let me briefly indicate why I do not find this standpoint natural”: Einstein, general relativity, and the contingent a priori. In M. Domski, and M. Dickson (eds.), Discourse on a new method: reinvigorating the marriage of history and philosophy of science. La Salle: Open Court.
  • Howard, Don. 2014. Einstein and the development of twentieth-century philosophy of science. In M. Janssen and C. Lehner (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Einstein, Vol. 1, pp. 354-376. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jammer, Max. 2006. Concepts of simultaneity. From antiquity to Einstein and beyond. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Janis, Allen. 2014. Conventionality of simultaneity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • Martínez, Alberto. 2005. Conventions and inertial reference frames. American Journal of Physics, 73: 452-454.
  • Norton, John. 2015. What can we learn about the ontology of space and time from the theory of relativity? In L. Sklar (ed.), Physical theory: method and interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185-228.
  • Paty, Michel. 1993. Einstein philosophe. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Reichenbach, Hans. 1922. The philosophical significance of the theory of relativity. In S. Gimbel, A. Walz (eds.), Defending Einstein: Hans Reichenbach’s writings on space, time, and motion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • Reichenbach, Hans. 1924. Axiomatization of the theory of relativity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.
  • Reichenbach, Hans. 1927. The philosophy of space and time. New York: Dover publications, 1957.
  • Rynasiewicz, Robert. 2003. Reichenbach’s ε-definition of simultaneity in historical and philosophical perspective. In F.Stadler (ed.), The Vienna circle and logical empiricism: re-evaluation and future perspectives. Vienna circle institute yearbook [2002] 10. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Ryckman, Thomas. 2005. The reign of relativity: philosophy in physics 1915-1925. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Synge, John Lighton. 1960. Relativity: the general theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Winnie, John. 1970. Special relativity without one-way velocity assumptions. Philosophy of science, 37: 81-99 and 223-238.
  • Zhang, Yuan Zhong. 1997. Special relativity and its experimental foundations. Singapore: World Scientific.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet