Geometry of motionsome elements of its historical development

Referencias bibliográficas

• Autolycos de pitate, La sphere en movement. Levers et couchers héliaques. Testimonia. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
• Berggren, Len, and Thomas, Robert (1996). Euclid’s Phaenomena. Providence: American
• Mathematical Society.
• Brackenridge, J. Bruce (1995). The key to Newton’s dynamics: the Kepler problem and the Principia.
• Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Clagett, Marshall (1961). The science of mechanics in the middle ages. Madison: The University of
• Wisconsin Press.
• Clavelin, Maurice (1974). The natural philosophy of Galileo. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Clavelin, Maurice (1983). Conceptual and technical aspects of the Galilean geometrization of
• the motion of heavy bodies. In W. R. Shea (ed.), Nature mathematized, vol. 1. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
• Damerow, Peter, Freudenthal, Gideon, McLaughlin, Peter, and Renn, Jürgen (2004).
• Exploring the limits of preclassical mechanics, second edition. New York: Springer.
• De Gandt, François (1995). Force and geometry in Newton’s Principia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Dijksterhuis, Eduard (1956). Archimedes. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
• Drake, Stillman (1978). Galileo at work. His scientific biography. Chicago: The University of
• Chicago Press.
• Drake, Stillman (1989). Two new sciences, second edition. Toronto: Wall & Emerson.
• Euclid, (1908). The thirteen Books of the Elements, second edition. Translated with introduction
• and commentary by Sir Thomas L. Heath, from the critical edition of Heiberg. Cambridge:
• Cambridge University Press.
• Evans, James (1998). The history and practice of ancient astronomy. Oxford: Oxford University
• Press.
• Funkenstein, Amos (2004). Theology and the scientific imagination. Princeton: Princeton
• University Press.
• Guicciardini, Niccolò (1999). Reading the principle: the debate on Newton’s mathematical methods for natural philosophy from 1687 to 1736. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Guicciardini, Niccolò (2009). Isaak Newton on mathematical certainty and method. Cambridge: MIT
• Press.
• Heath, Thomas (1897). The works of Archimedes. London: C. J. Clay and Sons.
• Heath, Thomas (1981). A history of Greek mathematics, vol. 1. New York: Dover Publications.
• Jullien, Vincent (2015). Indivisibles in the work of Galileo. In V. Jullien (ed.), Seventeenth century
• indivisibles revisited. Heidelberg: Birkhäusen.
• Mugler, Charles (1970). Archimède, vol. 1. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
• Netz, Reviel (2004). The works of Archimedes, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Netz, Reviel (2009). Ludic proof: Greek mathematics and the Alexandrian aesthetic. Cambridge:
• Cambridge University Press.
• Netz, Reviel (2017). The works of Archimedes, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Newton, Isaac (1971). The mathematical papers of Isaak Newton, vol. 4. Edited by D. T.
• Whiteside. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Newton, Isaac (1974). The mathematical papers of Isaak Newton, vol. 6. Edited by D. T.
• Whiteside. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Newton, Isaac (1999). The principia: mathematical principles of natural philosophy. The authoritative
• translation by I. B. Cohen and A. Whitman. Oakland: University of California Press, 1999.
• Pourciau, Bruce (2003). Newton’s argument for proposition 1 of the Principia. Archive for
• History of Exact Sciences, 57, 267-311.
• Wisan, Winifred (1974). The new science of motion: A study of Galileo’s De Motu Locali.
• Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 13, 103-306.