Los mercados alternativos bursátilesuna perspectiva regulatoria

  1. Palacín Sánchez, María José 1
  2. Pérez López, Carmen 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

Revista:
Cuadernos de economía: Spanish Journal of Economics and Finance

ISSN: 2340-6704,  0210-0266

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 39

Número: 109

Páginas: 1-11

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.CESJEF.2015.12.003 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openBiblos-e Archivo editor

Otras publicaciones en: Cuadernos de economía: Spanish Journal of Economics and Finance

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The debate over the appropriate regulation of financial markets has become a burning issue, especially as regards alternative stock markets aimed at small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This article reviews the international research that, on the one hand, analyses alternative markets from an economic-regulatory perspective, and that, on the other hand, studies the control mechanisms that have been identified as key factors to overcoming the limitations of a light regulation, such as corporate governance, nominated advisors, and auditors. The results show that tougher legislation is not a panacea for solving the problems and the limitations that are presented by the development of these alternative stock markets, and that satisfactory results can be provided through the balance and permanent adjustment of the agents involved, and of control mechanisms.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Audretsch D.B., Lehmann E.E. The effects of experience, ownership, and knowledge on IPO survival: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Accounting and Finance 2005, 4:13-33.
  • Bassett M., Koh P.-S., Tutticci I. The association between employee stock option disclosures and corporate governance: Evidence from an enhanced disclosure regime. The British Accounting Review 2007, 39:303-322.
  • Berry T., Fields L., Wilkins M. The interaction of multiple governance mechanisms in young newly public firms. Journal of Corporate Finance 2006, 12:449-466.
  • Bertoni F., Meoli M., Vismara S. Board independence, ownership structure, and the valuation of IPOs in Continental Europe. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2014, 22:116-131.
  • Benston G. Required disclosure and the stock market: An evaluation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. American Economic Review 1973, 63:132-155.
  • Bhattacharya U., Borisov A., Yu X. Firm mortality and natal financial care. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 2015, 50:61-88.
  • Burhop C., Chambers D., Cheffins B. Regulating IPOs: Evidence from going public in London, 1900-1913. Explorations in Economic History 2014, 51:60-76.
  • Cattaneo M., Meoli M., Vismara S. Financial regulation and IPOs: Evidence from the history of the Italian stock market. Journal of Corporate Finance 2014, 31:116-131.
  • Chambers D., Dimson E. IPO underpricing over the very long run. The Journal of Finance 2009, 64:1407-1443.
  • Chistensen J., Kent P., Routledge J., Stewart J. Are corporate governance recommendations relevant for small Australian listed companies?. Working paper in Gold Coast, Australian Bond University 2010.
  • Coffee J. Market failure and the economic case for a mandatory disclosure system. Virginia Law Review 1984, 70:717-753.
  • Cumming D., Johan S. Listing standards and fraud. Managerial Decisions Economics 2013, 34:451-470.
  • Davidson R., Goodwin-Stewart J., Kent P. Internal governance structures and earnings management. Accounting and Finance 2005, 45:241-267.
  • De Angelo L. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 1981, 3:183-199.
  • Espenlaub S., Khurshed A., Mohamed A. IPO Survival in a reputational market. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 2012, 39:427-463.
  • Fan J., Wong T. Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research 2005, 43:35-72.
  • Farag H., Mallin C., Ow-Yong K. Governance, ownership structure and performance in AIM companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2014, 22:100-115.
  • Finkle T.A. The relationship between boards of directors and initial public offerings in the biotechnology industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1998, 22:5-29.
  • Gallery G., Cooper E., Sweeting J. Corporate disclosure quality: Lessons from Australian companies on the impact of adopting International Financial Reporting Standards. Australian Accounting Review 2008, 18:257-273.
  • Gerakos J., Lang M., Maffett M. (2013). Post-listing performance and private sector regulation: the experience of the AIM: Working paper no. 13-14, Chicago Booth [consultado 29 Jun 2015]. Disponible en: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1740809.
  • Gordon I.M., Hrazdil K., Shapiro D. Corporate governance in publicly traded small firms: A study of Canadian venture exchange companies. Business Horizon 2012, 55:583-591.
  • Jarrell G. The economic effects of federal regulation of the market for new security issues. Journal of Law Economics 1981, 24:613-675.
  • Jenkinson T., Ramadorai T. (2010). Does One Size Fit All? The Consequences of Switching Markets with Different Regulatory Standards: Working Paper No. 212/2008. ECGI-Finance.
  • Kay J., Vickers J. Regulatory reform in Britain. Economic Policy 1988, 7:285-351.
  • Kent P., Stewart J. Corporate governance and disclosures on the transition to International Financial Reporting Standards. Accounting and Finance 2008, 48:649-671.
  • Mallin C.A., Ow-Yong K. Corporate Governance in small companies - Alternative investment market. Corporate Governance 1998, 6:224-232.
  • Mallin C.A., Ow-Yong K. (2008). Corporate Governance in Alternative Investment Market (AIM) Companies: Research Monograph Published by the Institute of Chartered Accountants, Scotland.
  • Mallin C., Ow-Yong K. The UK alternative investment market - Ethical dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 95:223-239.
  • Mallin C.A., Ow-Yong K. Factors influencing corporate governance disclosures in Alternative Investment Market (AIM) companies. European Journal of Finance 2012, 18:515-533.
  • Mulherin J.H. Corporations, collective action and corporate governance: One size does not fit all. Public Choice 2005, 124:179-204.
  • Mulherin J.H. Measuring the costs and benefits of regulation: Conceptual issues in securities markets. Journal of Corporate Finance 2007, 13:421-437.
  • Neal L., Davis L. The evolution of the rules and regulations of the first emerging markets: The London, New York, and Paris Stock Exchanges, 1792-1914. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 2005, 45:296-311.
  • Palacín-Sánchez M.J., Alonso Canales F. Financial forecasts on SMEs in IPOs: Fact or fiction?. Universia Business Review 2015, 4.° trimestre, 48:118-151.
  • Palmer P. Disclosure of the impacts of adopting Australian equivalents of International Financial Reporting Standards. Accounting and Finance 2008, 48:847-870.
  • Pandes J.A., Robinson, M.J. (2013). Effective Junior Equity Market Regulation: Working Paper in CFA Institute, Financial Analysts Journal, Schulich School of Business Symposium on Financial Public and Private Firms: Fraud, Ethics and Regulation.
  • Pandes J.A., Robinson M.J. Is effective junior equity market regulation possible?. Financial Analysts Journal 2014, 70:42-54.
  • Parsa S., Chong G., Isismoya E. Disclosure of governance information by small and medium-sized companies. Corporate Governance 2007, 7:635-648.
  • Pérez J. La relevancia de una regulación proporcionada en sus términos. La regulación financiera: ¿solución o problema? 2015, 21-32. Fundación de Estudios Financieros, Madrid. J. Pérez (Ed.).
  • Plastow K., Gallery G., Gallery N. Practices of smaller listed Australian companies. Corporate Ownership & Control 2012, 10:233-251.
  • Prentice R. Whither securities regulations? Some behavioral observations regarding proposal for its future. Duke Law Journal 2002, 51:1399-1509.
  • Rasch S. (1994). Special stock market segments for small company shares in Europe - What went wrong? Discussion Paper no. 94-13. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheimm, Germany.
  • Reddy K., Locke S., Scrimgeour F., Gunasekarage A. Corporate governance practices of small cap companies and their financial performance: An empirical study in New Zealand. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2008, 4:51-78.
  • Santillán I., Martínez-Pardo R. La regulación en los mercados de valores y su especificidad. La regulación financiera: ¿solución o problema? 2015, 125-135. Fundación de Estudios Financieros, Madrid. J. Pérez (Ed.).
  • Shaked A., Sutton J. The self-regulating profession. Review of Economic Studies 1981, 48:217-234.
  • Simon C.J. The effect of the 1933 Securities Act on investor information and the performance of new issues. American Economic Review 1989, 79:295-318.
  • Stigler G. Public regulation of the securities markets. Journal of Business 1964, 37:117-142.
  • Stringham E. The extralegal development of securities trading in seventeenth-century Amsterdam. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 2003, 43:321-344.
  • Stringham E., Boettke P., Clark J.R. Are regulations the answer for emerging stock markets? Evidence from the Czech Republic and Poland. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 2008, 48:541-566.
  • Stringham E.P., Chen I. The alternative of private regulation: The London Stock Exchange's alternative investment markes as a model. Economic Affairs 2012, 32:37-43.
  • Taking AIM Annual Survey 2009: The Big Picture 2009, Baker Tilly and Faegre & Benson, London.
  • Teoh S., Wong T. Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review 1993, 68:346-366.
  • Vismara S., Paleari S., Ritter J. Europe's second markets for small companies. European Financial Management 2012, 18:352-388.
  • Weber J., Willenborg M. Do expert informational intermediaries add value? Evidence from auditors in microcap IPOs. Journal of Accounting Research 2003, 41:681-720.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet