Las preferencias discontinuas en los experimentos de elecciónimpacto en el cálculo de la prima de los programas agroambientales

Referencias bibliográficas

• Barreiro-Hurlé, J., Espinosa-Goded, M. y Dupraz, P. (2009). “Estrategias para incrementar la participación en programas agroambientales: el papel del capital social”. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 9(2):3-26. https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2009.02.01
• Birol, E., Smale, M. y Gyovai, A. (2006). “Using a choice experiment to estimate farmers’ valuation of agrobiodiversity of Hungarian small farms”. Environmental and Resource Eco-nomics, 34(4):439-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-0009-9
• Blamey, R. K., Bennett, J.W., Louviere, J.J., Morrison, M.D. y Rolfe, J.C. (2002). “Attribute causality in environmental choice modelling”. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(2):167-186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021202425295
• Burgess, L. (2007). Discrete Choice Experiments [computer software]. Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, disponible en http://crsu.science.uts.edu.au/choice/.
• Campbell, D., Hutchinson, G. y Scarpa, R. (2006). Lexicographic preferences in discrete choice experiments: Consequences on individual-specific willingness to pay estimates. Documento de trabajo Fondazione Eni Enrico Matei. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.936933
• Campbell, D., Hutchinson, W.G. y Scarpa, R. (2008). “Incorporating discontinous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments”. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41(3):401-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9198-8
• Campbell, D. y Lorimer, V. (2009). “Accommodating attribute processing strategies in stated choice analysis: do respondents do what they say they do?”. Comunicación presentada a la XVII Conferencia anual de la Asociación Europea de Economía Ambiental y de los Recursos Naturales, Amsterdam.
• Caussade, S., Ortúzar, J. de D., Rizzi, L.I. y Hensher, D.A. (2005). “Assesing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates”. Transportation Research Part B, 39(7):621-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2004.07.006
• Carlsson, F., Kataria, M. y Lampi, E. (2009). Dealing with ignored attributes in choice experiments on valuation of Sweden’s environmental quality objectives. Documento de trabajo de la School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Göteborg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9365-6
• DeShazo, J.R. y Fermo, G. (2002). “Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(1):123-143. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1199
• DeShazo, J.R. y Fermo, G. (2004). Implications of rationally-adaptative pre-choice behaviour for the design and estimation of choice models. Documento de trabajo, University of California.
• Dhar, R. (1997). “Consumer preferences for a no-choice option”. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2):215-231. https://doi.org/10.1086/209506
• Espinosa-Goded, M. y Barreiro-Hurlé, J. (2008). “Diferencias entre el conocimiento subjetivo y el conocimiento objetivo de los compromisos ambientales: el caso de las medidas agroambientales en España”. Comunicación Oral presentada al III Congreso de la Asociación Hispano-Portuguesa de Economía de los Recursos Naturales y Ambientales, Palma de Mallorca.
• Espinosa-Goded, M., Dupraz, P. y Barreiro-Hurlé, J. (2009). Fixed costs involved in crop pattern changes and agri-environmental schemes. Documento de trabajo SMARTLERECO 09-15, INRA, Rennes.
• Drake, L., Bergström, P. y Svedsäter, H. (1999). “Farmers’ attitude and uptake”. En: Huylenbroeck, G.V. y Whitby, M. (Eds.): Countryside Stewardship:farmers, policy and markets. Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp. 89-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043587-9/50007-9
• Gelso, B.R. y Peterson, J.M. (2005). “The influence on the demand for environmental recreation: incorporating lexicographic preferences”. Ecological Economics, 53(1):35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.021
• Gómez de Molina, M. (2002). “Environmental constraints on agricultural growth in the 19th century in Granada (Southern Spain)”. Ecological Economics, 41(2):257-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00030-7
• Hensher, D.A., Rose, J. y Greene, W.H. (2005). “The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes”. Transportation, 32(3):203-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-7613-8
• Huber, J. y Pinnell, J. (1994). The impact of set quality and choice difficulty on the decision todefer purchase. Documento de trabajo, Duke University.
• Lockwood, M. (1996). “Non-compensatory preference structures in non-market valuation of natural area policy”. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40(2):85-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.1996.tb00557.x
• Louviere, J.J., Street, D., Carson, R., Ainslie, A., Deshazo, J., Cameron, T., Hensher, D., Kohn, R. y Marley, T. (2002). “Dissecting the random component of utility”. Marketing Letters, 13(3):177-193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020258402210
• Louviere, J.L., Eagle, T.C. y Cohen, S.H. (2005). Conjoint Analysis: Methods, Myths and Much More. Documento de trabajo del Censoc No 05-001:31, University of Technology, Sydney.
• Luce, M.F., Payne, J.W. y Bettman, J.R. (2000). “Coping with unfavorable attribute values in choice”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(2):274-299. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2872
• Maddala, G.S (2001). Introduction to econometrics. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken. McCann, L. y Easter, K.W. (2000). “Estimates of public sector transaction costs in NRCS programs”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 32(3):555-563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800020642
• Paniagua, A. (2001). “Agri-environmental policy in Spain. The agenda of socio-political developments at the national, regional and local levels”. Journal of Rural Studies, 17(1):81-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00028-0
• Qin, P. (2009). Risk, relative standing and property rights: rural household decision-making in China. Documento de trabajo de la School of Business, Economics and Law University of Göteborg.
• Rekola, M. (2003). “Lexicographic preferences in contingent valuation: a theoretical framework with illustrations”. Land Economics, 79(2):277-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146871
• Roessler, R., Drucker, A.D., Scarpa, R., Markemann, A., Lemke, U., Thuy, L. y Valle Zárate, A. (2007). “Using choice experiments to assess smallholder farmers’ preferences for pig breeding traits in different production systems in North-West Vietman”. Ecological Economics, 66(1):184-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.023
• Rose, J.M., Hensher, D.A., Caussade, S. y Ortuzar, J.de Dios. (2009). “Identifying differences in willingness to pay due to dimensionality in stated choice experiments: a cross country analysis”. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(1):21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.05.001
• Rosenberger, R.S., Peterson, G.L., Clarke, A. y Brown, T.C. (2003). “Measuring dispositions for lexicographic preferences of environmental goods: integrating economics, psychology and ethics”. Ecological Economics, 44(1):63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00221-5
• Ruto, E. y Garrod, G. (2009). “Investigating farmers’ preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: a choice experiment approach”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(5):631-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560902958172
• Sælensminde, K.(2001). “Inconsistent choices in stated choice data: use of the logit scaling approach to handle resulting variance increases”. Transportation, 28(3):269-296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010351102128
• Scarpa, R., Drucker, A.G., Anderson, S., Ferraes-Ehuan, N., Gómez, V., Risopatrón, C.R. y Rubio-Leonel, O. (2003a). “Valuing genetic resources in peasant economies: the case of ‘hairless’ creole pigs in Yucatan”. Ecological Economics, 45(3):427-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00095-8
• Scarpa, R., Ruto, E., Kristjanson, P., Radeny, M., Drucker, A.G. y Rege, J.E.O. (2003b). “Valuing indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya: an empirical comparison of stated and revealed preference value estimates”, Ecological Economics, 45(3):409-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00094-6
• Scarpa, R., Ferrini, S. y Willis, K.G. (2005). “Performance of error component models for status-quo effects in choice experiments”, En: Scarpa, R. y Alberrini, A. (Eds.): Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics. Springer Publisher, Dordrecht: 247-273.
• Scarpa, R., Gilbride, T.J., Campbell, D. y Hensher, D.A. (2009). “Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation”. European Review of Agri-cultural Economics, 36(2):151-174. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbp012
• Spash, C. L. y Hanley, N. (1995). “Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation”. Ecological Economics , 12(3):191-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)00056-2
• Spash, C. L. (2000). “Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation”. Ecological Economics, 34(2):195-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00158-0
• Siebert, R., Toogood, M. y Knierim, A. (2006). “Factors affecting European farmers participation in biodiversity policies”. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(4):318-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x
• Street, D.J., Burgess, L. y Louviere, J. (2005). “Quick and easy choice sets: constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments”. International Journal of Research Marketing, 22(4):459-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.09.003
• Street, D.J. y Burgess, L.(2007). Construction of optimal stated choice experiments. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470148563
• Train, K.E. (1999). Halton sequences for mixed logit. Documento de trabajo, University of California.
• Train, K.E. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753930
• Vanslembrouck, I., Van Huylenbroeck, G. y Verbeke, W. (2002). “Determinants of the Willingness of Belgian Farmers to Participate in Agri-Environmental Measures”. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(3):489-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2002.tb00034.x
• Wossink, G. y Van Wenum, J. (2003). “Biodiversity conservation by farmers: analysis of actual and contingent participation”. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(4):461-485. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/30.4.461
• Wynn, G., Crabtree, B. y Potts, J. (2001). “Modelling farmer entry into de environmentally sensitive area schemes in Scotland”. Journal of Agricultural economics, 51(1):65-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2001.tb00910.x