Relationship between slack resources and performance: temporal symmetry and duration of effects

  1. Maria Agusti-Perez 1
  2. Jose Luis Galan 1
  3. Francisco J. Acedo 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

Revista:
European journal of management and business economics

ISSN: 2444-8494,  2444-8451

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 29

Número: 3

Páginas: 255-275

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1108/EJMBE-10-2019-0177 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: European journal of management and business economics

Resumen

Purpose – Although slack resources and their relationship to performance have been widely studied in the literature, the temporal symmetry of this relationship, and the duration of its effects, are still unknown aspects and are the objective of this paper. Design/methodology/approach – To evaluate this effect, an exploratory study has been designed on a sample of 449 Spanish industrial companies over a period of 12 years, assessing the impact of idle resources on economic and financial profitability. By means of hierarchical regressions, the short- term, medium- term and long-term effects of slack resources have been evaluated. Findings – The results show that the impact on performance depends on the type of resource considered. Available slack has a consistent and positive effect on economic profitability in the short term. Other types of slack show persistent effects on performance, but, in the case of the recoverable slack, with a negative sign that contradicts the benefits provided by these resources. Finally, potential slack only has a permanent effect on financial profitability, but the sign changes depending on the economic context under consideration. There are also differences in the duration of the effects according to the type of resources. Originality/value – This paper advances the knowledge about the slack-performance relationship over time that has been scarcely studied.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Argilés-Bosch, J.M., Garcia-Blandon, J., Ravenda, D. and Martınez-Blasco, M. (2018), “An empirical analysis of the curvilinear relationship between slack and firm performance”, Journal of Management Control, Vol. 29 Nos 3-4, pp. 361-397.
  • Bourgeois, L.J. (1981), “On the measurement of organizational slack”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 29-39.
  • Bourgeois, L.J. and Singh, J.V. (1983), “Organizational slack and political behavior among top management teams”, Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 1, pp. 43-47.
  • Bradley, S.W., Shepherd, D.A. and Wiklund, J. (2011), “The importance of slack for new organizations facing ‘tough’ environments”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 48 No. 5, pp. 1071-1097.
  • Canto-Cuevas, F.J., Palacın-Sanchez, M.J. and di Pietro, F. (2016), “Efectos del ciclo economico en el credito comercial: el caso de la pyme espanola ~ ”, European Research on Management and Business Economics, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 55-62.
  • Carnes, C.M., Xu, K., Sirmon, D.G. and Karadag, R. (2019), “How competitive action mediates the resource slack–performance relationship: a meta-analytic approach”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 57-90.
  • Cheng, J.L.C. and Kessner, I.F. (1997), “Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: the impact of resource allocation patterns”, Journal of Management, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 1-18.
  • Chiu, Y.-C. and Liaw, Y.-C. (2009), “Organizational slack: is more or less better?”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 321-342.
  • Cyert, R. and March, J.G. (1963), “A behavioural theory of the firm”, Firm, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1956), “Organizational factors in the theory of oligopoly”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 44-64.
  • Dagostim Picolo, J., dal Magro, C., da, S.T.P. and Luciano, B. (2018), “The influence of the financial slack on the economical performance of Brazilian and Chilean companies”, Cuadernos de Economıa, Vol. 41 No. 115, pp. 19-30.
  • Daniel, F., Lohrke, F.T., Fornaciari, C.J. and Turner, R.A. (2004), “Slack resources and firm performance: a meta-analysis”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57 No. 6, pp. 565-574.
  • Deb, P., David, P. and O’Brien, J. (2017), “When is cash good or bad for firm performance?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 436-454.
  • George, G. (2005), “Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 661-676.
  • Gral, B. (2014), How Financial Slack Affects Corporate Performance, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.
  • Greenley, E., Greenley, G.E., Oktemgil, M., Greenley, E., Greenley, G.E. and Oktemgil, M. (1998), “A comparison of slack resources in high and low performing British companies”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 35 May, pp. 377-398.
  • Guo, J., Zhou, B., Zhang, H., Hu, C. and Song, M. (2018). “Does strategic planning help firms translate slack resources into better performance?”, Journal of Management and Organization, pp. 1-13, available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journalof-management-and-organization/article/does-strategic-planning-help-firms-translate-slackresources-into-better-performance/FDBDDDF61759947565FC0DE48D078B60.
  • Jensen, M.C. (1986), “Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 76 No. 2, pp. 323-329.
  • Ju, M. and Zhao, H. (2009), “Behind organizational slack and firm performance in China: the moderating roles of ownership and competitive intensity”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 701-717.
  • Kuusela, P., Keil, T. and Maula, M. (2017). “Driven by aspirations, but in what direction? Performance shortfalls, slack resources, and resource-consuming vs. resource-freeing organizational change”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 1101-1120.
  • Lecuona, J.R. and Reitzig, M. (2014), “Knowledge worth having in ‘excess’: the value of tacit and firmspecific human resource slack”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 35 No. 7, pp. 954-973.
  • Lee, S. (2011), “How financial slack affects firm performance”, Journal of Economic Research, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 1-27.
  • Leyva-de la Hiz, D.I., Ferron-Vilchez, V. and Aragon-Correa, J.A. (2019), “Do firms’ slack resources influence the relationship between focused environmental innovations and financial performance? More is not always better”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 159, pp. 1215-1227.
  • Love, E.G. and Nohria, N. (2005), “Reducing slack: the performance consequences of downsizing by large industrial firms, 1977-93”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26 No. 12, pp. 1087-1108.
  • Marlin, D. and Geiger, S.W. (2015), “A reexamination of the organizational slack and innovation relationship”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68 No. 12, pp. 2683-2690.
  • Paeleman, I., Fuss, C. and Vanacker, T. (2017), “Untangling the multiple effects of slack resources on firms’ exporting behavior”, Journal of World Business, Vol. 52 No. 6, pp. 769-781.
  • Paeleman, I. and Vanacker, T. (2015), “Less is more, or not? On the interplay between bundles of slack resources, firm performance and firm survival”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 52 No. 6, pp. 819-848.
  • Penrose, E.T. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, in Penrose, E.T. (Ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  • Penrose, E.T. (1960), “The growth of the firm: a case study”, Business History Review, doi: 10.2307/ 3111776.
  • Phan, P.H. and Hill, C.W.L. (1995), “Organizational restructuring and economic performance in leveraged buyouts: an ex post study”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 704-739.
  • Rosen, J. (2005), “Comment: the symmetry principle”, Entropy.
  • Sánchez, M.J. and Suarez, I. (2005), “El ambito espanol: motivos y modalidades utilizadas ~ ”, Revista Europea de Direccion y Economıa de La Empresa, Vol. 14 Nos 1019-6838, pp. 81-96.
  • Sharfman, M.P., Wolf, G., Chase, R.B. and Tansik, D.A. (1988), “Antecedents of organizational slack”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 601-614.
  • Tan, J. (2003), “Curvilinear relationship between organizational slack and firm performance: evidence from Chinese State enterprises”, European Management Journal, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 740-749.
  • Tan, J. and Peng, M.W. (2003), “Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 24 No. 2003, pp. 1249-1263.
  • Tang, Y., Qian, C., Chen, G. and Shen, R. (2015), “How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir) responsibility”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 36 No. 9, pp. 1338-1357.
  • Tsang, E.W.K. (2006), “Behavioral assumptions and theory development: the case of transaction cost economics”, Strategic Management Journal, doi: 10.1002/smj.553.
  • Vanacker, T., Collewaert, V. and Zahra, S.A. (2017), “Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: evidence from privately held European firms”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 1305-1326.
  • Wefald, A.J., Katz, J.P., Downey, R.G. and Rust, K.G. (2010), “Organizational slack and performance: the impact of outliers”, Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 1-10.
  • Wan, W.P. and Yiu, D.W. (2009), “From crisis to opportunity: environmental jolt, corporate acquisitions, and firm performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 30 No. 7, pp. 791-801.
  • Zona, F. (2012), “Corporate investing as a response to economic downturn: prospect theory, the behavioural agency model and the role of financial slack”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 23 Suppl 1, pp. 42-57.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet