Derechos de la naturaleza y personalidad jurídica de los ecosistemasnuevo paradigma de protección medioambiental. Un enfoque comparado

  1. Ricardo Ignacio Bachmann Fuentes 1
  2. Valentín Navarro Caro 2
  1. 1 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

  2. 2 Universidad Internacional Isabel I de Castilla
    info

    Universidad Internacional Isabel I de Castilla

    Burgos, España

    ROR https://ror.org/055sgt471

Journal:
Revista internacional de pensamiento político

ISSN: 1885-589X

Year of publication: 2021

Issue: 16

Pages: 357-378

Type: Article

DOI: 10.46661/REVINTPENSAMPOLIT.6336 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista internacional de pensamiento político

Abstract

Currently, there is a global level of an interesting group of legal norms that recognize or grant to nature or a specific ecosystem, the status of Legal Personhood and whose purpose is environmental protection and conservation. In turn, this award or recognition has also been carried out through the judgements of the higher courts. The motivations may vary, depending on whether that ecosystem is conceived as a living being or as a protectable patrimony. In this article, cases of Latin America, North America, Oceania and Asia will be approached to finally provide some conclusions based on a comparative analysis regarding the main features and their possible effects.

Bibliographic References

  • Alcivar Toala, M. (2018). Los derechos de la naturaleza: una legitimación de derechos a la Pacha Mama dentro del Estado". Revista San Gregorio, Nº 26 extra, pp. 30-37.
  • Alley, K. (2019). River Goddesses, Personhood and Rights of Nature: Implications for Spiritual Ecology. Religions, Vol. 10 (9), pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10090502
  • Attfield, R. (2016). Voz Biocentrism. The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781444367072 [Consultado el 20 de octubre de 2021]. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee670.pub2
  • Bedón Garzón, R. (2016) Contenido y aplicación de los derechos de la naturaleza. Ius Humani, Revista de Derecho, Nº5, 2016, pp. 133-148. https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v5i0.124
  • Boslaugh, S. E. (2016) Voz Anthropocentrism en Encyclopaedia Britannica. Disponible en: https://www.britannica.com/topic/anthropocentrism [Consultado: 10 de octubre de 2021].
  • Brennan A.; Yeuk-Sze, L. (2016) Voz Environmental Ethics en Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Disponible en: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-environmental/ [Consultado: 1 de octubre de 2021)
  • Charpleix, L. (2018). The Whanganui River as Te Awa Tupua: Place-based law in a legally pluralistic society. The Geographical Journal, Nº 184, Issue 1, pp. 19-30. DOI:10.1111/geoj.12238
  • Deckha, M. (2020). Unsettling anthropocentric Legal Systems: Reconciliation, Indigenous Laws and Animal Personhood. Journal of Intercultural Studies, Vol. 41, Issue 1, pp. 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2019.1704229
  • Erdós L. (2019) Green Heroes. From Buddha to Leonardo DiCaprio. Springer International Publishing, Suiza. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31806-2
  • Gobierno de Nueva Zelanda. Voz Te Ara en The Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Disponible en: https://teara.govt.nz/en/te-ao-marama-the-natural-world/page-5 [Consultado: 2 de octubre de 2021].
  • Gudynas, E. (2010). La senda biocéntrica: valores intrínsecos, derechos de la naturaleza y justicia ecológica. Tabula Rasa, Nº 13, pp. 45-72. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.404
  • Hasson de Oliveira, V. (2020) Direitos da Natureza no Brasil: o caso de Bonito- PE en LACERDA, L. (Coordinador) Direitos da Natureza, marcos para a construçao de uma teoria geral. Sao Leopoldo, Casa Leiria, pp. 131-146. https://doi.org/10.29327/524851.1-10
  • Hogan, M. (2007) Standing for nonhuman animals: Developing a Guardianship Model from de dissents in Sierra Club. Vs. Morton. California Law Review, Vol. 95 (513), pp. 513-534. https://doi.org/10.2307/20439100
  • Horta, O. (2009) El cuestionamiento del antropocentrismo: distintos enfoques normativos. Revista de Bioética y Derecho, Nº 16, pp. 36-39.
  • Huanacuni, F. (2016) Los derechos de la Madre Tierra. Revista Jurídica Derecho, Vol. 3, Nº 4, pp. 157-169.
  • Iors, C. (2019) From Rights to Responsibilities using Legal Personhood and Guardianship for Rivers. En: MARTIN, B; TE AHO, L; M HUMPHRIES-KIL, M. (Editores). ResponsAbility: Law and Governance for Living Well with the Earth. Londres y Nueva York: Editorial Routledge, pp 216-239. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467622-15
  • Islam, M; O'Donell, E. (2020) Legal rights for the Turag: rivers as living entities in Bangladesh. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, Vol.23 (2), pp. 160-177. https://doi.org/10.4337/apjel.2020.02.03
  • Kaufmann, C; Martin, P. (2018) Constructing Rights of Nature Norms in the US, Ecuador and New Zealand. Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 18 (4), pp. 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00481
  • McKeown, M. (2019) The trees are still standing: The backstory of Sierra Club. V. Morton. Journal of Supreme Court History, Vol. 44 (2), pp. 189-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsch.12210
  • Madjarian, G. (2009) El derecho del hombre a disponer del mundo. Gazeta de Antropología, Nº 25/2. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.6894
  • Mattar, S. (2012) "Yeats, Fairies and the New Animism". New Literary History, Vol. 43, Nº 1, pp. 137-157. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2012.0006
  • Megías Quirós, J.J. (2014). El dominio sobre la naturaleza: de la moderación escolástica al relativismo kantiano. Persona y Derecho, Nº 70, pp. 147-169. https://doi.org/10.15581/011.70.147-169
  • O'Bryan, K. (2019) The changing face of river management in Victoria: The Yarra River Protection (Wilip-gin birrarung murron) Act 2017 (Vic). Water International, Vol. 4 (6-7), pp. 769-785. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1616370
  • O'Donell, E; Talbot-Jones, J. (2018) Creating legal rights for rivers: lessons from Australia, New Zealand and India. Ecology and Society, Vol. 23 (1), Art. 7. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09854-230107
  • O'Donell, E. (2018) At the Intersection of the Sacred and the Legal: Rights for Nature in Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Environmental Law, Issue 30, pp. 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqx026
  • Prada Cadavid, A. (2012) Antropocentrismo jurídico: Perspectivas desde la filosofía del derecho ambiental. Criterio Libre Jurídico, Vol. 9 (1), pp. 29-43.
  • Rodgers, C. (2017). A new approach to protecting ecosystems: The Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017. Environmental Law Review Vol. 19 (4), pp. 266-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452917744909
  • Salazar Ortiz, V; Láriz Durón, J. (2017). Una crítica al antropocentrismo desde la ética ambiental. Euphyía, Vol. 11 (20), pp. 107-130. https://doi.org/10.33064/20euph1363
  • Strack, M. (2017). Land and rivers can own themselves. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, Vol. 9 (1) pp. 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-10-2016-0016
  • Tanasescu, M. (2016) Environment, Political Representation and the Challenge of Rights. Palgrave MacMillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137538956
  • Tepper, E; Whitehead, C. (2018). Moon Inc.: The New Zealand model of granting legal personality to natural resources applied to space. New Space, 6 (4), pp. 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2018.0025 https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2018.0025
  • The Cyrus R. Vance Center. (2020). Rights of Rivers. A global survey of the rapidly developing Rights of Nature jurisprudence pertaining to rivers. Oakland: The Cyrus R. Vance Center, Earth Law Center, International Rivers.
  • Viaene, L. (2021). Indigenous Water Ontologies, Hydro-Development and the Human/More Than Human Right to Water: A Call for Critical Engagement with Plurilegal Water Realities. Water, Vol. 13 (1660), pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121660
  • Yu, M; Yi, L. (2009) Biocentric Ethical Theories. Teng y Ding (Editores) Environment and development, Vol. II. EOLSS, UNESCO, Oxford, Reino Unido.
Data source: Dialnet