Beyond the modern shapes of the equality principle. Notes for a transition

  1. José María Seco Martínez 1
  1. 1 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

Aldizkaria:
Revista internacional de pensamiento político

ISSN: 1885-589X

Argitalpen urtea: 2021

Zenbakia: 16

Orrialdeak: 611-632

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.46661/REVINTPENSAMPOLIT.6080 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista internacional de pensamiento político

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

Equality as a historic process of human emancipation, transcends the strictly legal/formal plane. Furthermore, it is enhanced by the “historic” willingness to democratise society and improve people’s lives. This is the materialistic dimension of the principle of equality, this ethical and historical “willingness” based on the production and development of social justice as a criterion and principle for action. Human rights and democracy, with their fighting practices and traditions, cannot be understood today without the idea of equality as a necessary principle. Human rights have always been linked to processes of reaction against inequalities. They have been and remain a reaction to any kind of oppression and/or domination, because human rights, which are rights and are human, are always actions that refer to human beings in need. The fact that they were formally conceived under the umbrella of normative reasoning does not presuppose that they should be conceived exclusively as individual rights, which demand fulfilment in the future, or even as horizons of possibility (idealistic vision), but as a ways of life that make human existence – dignified existence – feasible for all people. The idea of equality is, therefore, not possible without this material judgement of existence.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Albert M, Cagan L., Liberating Theory, South End Press, Boston, 1986.
  • Alzaga O., Derecho Político Español, según la Constitución de 1978 I, (Constitution and Sources of Law), Ramón Are- ces, Madrid, 2010.
  • Añón, Mª J., Igualdad, diferencias y desigualdades, Fontamara, Mexico, 2001.
  • Añón, Mª J.,, "Igualdad y procedimiento administrativo especial para inmigrantes", Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, nº 14, 2007, p. 18.
  • Aristotle, Politics III, 9, 1280a
  • Barber B., Superman and Common Men. Freedom, Anarchy and The Revolution, Praeger, New York, 1971.
  • Barber B., The Death of Communal Liber- ty. A History of Freedom in a Swiss Moun- tain Canton, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1974.
  • Barber, B., "Making Democracy Strong," in Murchland B., Voices in America. Bi- centennial Conversations, Prakken, Ann Arbor, 1987.
  • Barber, B., The Conquest of Politics. Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1988.
  • Barry P., Ser ciudadano, (translated by A. Mendoza from the original Deep Citizen- ship, Pluto Press, 1996) Sequitur, Madrid, 1999.
  • Bowles S., and Gintis H., Democracy and Capitalism. Property, Community and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought, Basic Books, New York, 1986.
  • Didier, M., El principio de la Igualdad en las Normas Jurídicas, Marcial Pons, Bue- nos Aires, 2011.
  • Dussel E., Ética de la liberación en la edad de la globalización y la exclusión, Trotta, Madrid 1998. https://doi.org/10.7202/401177ar
  • Ellacuría I., Filosofía de la realidad histórica, UCA Editores, San Salvador, 1990.
  • Ferrajoli L., Derechos y garantías. La Ley del más débil, Trotta, Madrid, 1999.
  • Fisher W.F., and Ponniah T., (ed.), An- other World is Possible, Zed Books, New York, 2003. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350218499
  • Herrera, J., "Legalidad: Explorando la nueva ciudadanía", in Campos de juego de la ciudadanía, Various Authors, El Viejo Topo, Barcelona, 2003.
  • Hinkelammert F., Crítica de la razón utópica, Desclée de Brouwer, Bilbao 2002; Id., Democracia y totalitarismo, DEI., San José,1991; Id., El mapa del emperador, San José, DEI, San José, 1998; and fi- nally, El grito del sujeto, DEI., San José, 1998.
  • Ibañez J., Más allá de la Sociología. El grupo de discusión: técnica y crítica, Siglo XIX, Madrid, 1986.
  • Ibañez, J., Corrupción y Estado de Derecho. El papel de la jurisdicción, Trotta, Madrid, 1996.
  • Miliband, R., "The Socialist Alternative," in Diamond L., Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy Revisited, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1993.
  • Miliband, Socialism for a Sceptical Age, Polity Press, London, 1995.
  • Mounier E., Manifiesto al servicio del per- sonalismo, in Obras Completas, Sígueme, Salamanca, 1992.
  • Orestano, R., Introducción al estudio del derecho romano, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid-BOE, Madrid, 1997.
  • Parenti M., Democracy for the Few, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1988.
  • Rey, F., "El principio de la igualdad en el contexto de la crisis del Estado Social: Diez problemas actuales", in Presno M.(Coord.) La Metamorfosis del Estado y el Derecho, Fundamentos, Oviedo, 2014.
  • Ronconi L.&Vita, L., "El principio de igualdad en la enseñanza del Derecho Constitucional", in Academia. Revista sobre enseñanza del Derecho, Buenos Aires, nº 19, 2012.
  • Sánchez, S.&Mellado P., El Sistema de fuentes en el ordenamiento español, Ramón Areces, Madrid, 2010.
  • Scuccimarra L., I confini del mondo, Il Mulino, Bolonia, 2006.
  • Sousa, B., Sociología Jurídica Crítica, Trotta, Madrid, 2009, p. 457.
  • Shumpeter J.A., Capitalismo, socialismo y democracia, Folio, Barcelona, 1984.
  • Solórzano N., Crítica de la Imaginación Jurídica. Una Mirada desde la epistemo- logía y la historia al derecho moderno y su ciencia, Universidad Autónoma de San Luís de Potosí, San Luís de Potosí, 2007.
  • Woods E.M., Democracy against Capi- talism: renewing historical materialism, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558344
Datuen iturria: Dialnet