“Hey there! I am using WhatsApp”: A Preliminary Study of Recurrent Discursive Realisations in a Corpus of WhatsApp Statuses

  1. Sánchez-Moya, Alfonso
  2. Cruz-Moya, Olga
Revista:
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

ISSN: 1877-0428

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 212

Páginas: 52-60

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.11.298 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Berker, (2006), Maidenhead: Open University Press
  • Bolander, B., & Locher, M.A. (2014). Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues. iscourse, Context & Media, 3, 14-26. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2013.10.004.
  • Calero-Vaquera, (2014), Oralia:;1; Análisis del discurso oral, 17, pp. 87
  • Crystal, (2006), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Church, K., & de Oliveira, R. (2013). What's up with WhatsApp?: comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. In. roceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 352-361).
  • ACM. Eisenlauer, V. (2014). Facebook as a third author—(Semi-) automated participation framework in Social Network Sites. Journal of Pragmatics,.[72,] 73-85. DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.006.
  • Garcia, D., & Sikström, S. (2014). The dark side of Facebook: Semantic representations of status updates predict the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 92-96. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.001.
  • Gillen, (2013), Language sciences, 35, pp. 47, 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.015
  • Sánchez-Moya, A. & Cruz-Moya, O. (2015). WhatsApp, Textese and Moral Panics: Discourse Features and Habits Across Two Generations. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 173, 300-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.069.
  • Stöckl, H. (2004). In between modes: Language and image in printed media. In: Ventola, Eija, Cassily, Charles, Kaltenbacher, Martin (Eds.), Perspectives on Multimodality. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, pp. 9-30.
  • Sultan, A.J. (2014). Addiction to mobile text messaging applications is nothing to “lol” about. The Social Science Journal, 51(1), 57-69. DOI:.10.1016/j.soscij.2013.09.003.
  • Tagliamonte S.A. & Denis D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech 83,3-34. DOI:.10.1215/00031283-2008-001.
  • Thompson, C (2008) Brave new world of digital intimacy New York Times Retrieved from:. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html?%257Dpagewanted=all&_r=1&.
  • Thorne, S.L., & Fischer, I. (2012). Online gaming as sociable media. Alsic. Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d’Information et de.Communication, 15(1).
  • Thorne, S.L., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, Identities, and Expressive Activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215-.233.
  • Thurlow, (2003), Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people's text-messaging. Discourse analysis online, 1, pp. 30
  • Yus, (2011), 213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing
  • Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. A&C Black.