Gendering migrationsecuritization and integration media narratives in Europe

  1. Delgado Morán, Juan Jose 1
  2. Teano, Fulvia 2
  1. 1 Universidad Católica San Antonio
    info

    Universidad Católica San Antonio

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05b1rsv17

  2. 2 University of Trento
    info

    University of Trento

    Trento, Italia

    ROR https://ror.org/05trd4x28

Revista:
Vergentis: revista de investigación de la Cátedra Internacional conjunta Inocencio III

ISSN: 2445-2394

Ano de publicación: 2020

Título do exemplar: Migrants and refugees in the Law (IV). Historic evolution, current situation and unsolved questions

Número: 11

Páxinas: 93-126

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Vergentis: revista de investigación de la Cátedra Internacional conjunta Inocencio III

Resumo

La migración se ha convertido en un fenómeno extremamente importante y complejo de nuestro tiempo. La emigración masiva, y en particular el desplazamiento forzado, nunca han sido más intensos que en la actualidad. Al mismo tiempo, al mismo tiempo presenciamos la mayor propagación del sentimiento anti-inmigrante visto en décadas. La migración está inevitablemente destinada a generar cambios económicos, sociales y culturales, pero también políticos, que deberían involucrar a los actores políticos, es decir, a los gobiernos, en la creación de un marco que busque entender la presencia de inmigrantes no como una amenaza sino como una oportunidad. El desarrollo, en la Unión Europea, de un discurso migratorio “securitizado” agravó este tema, con implicaciones estructurales y de género particulares. Las mujeres representan una proporción cada vez mayor de los migrantes, son particularmente vulnerables a los efectos de la securitización, y su protección se han convertido en un gran desafío para los gobiernos y las ONGs. Esta investigación profundizará los desarrollos recientes sobre las conexiones entre la inmigración y la integración a nivel europeo y analizará las tensiones presentes en los discursos de la prensa y cómo sus implicaciones afectan las experiencias de las mujeres

Referencias bibliográficas

  • BENEDICTO, A.R., BRUNE,P., «Building walls: Fear and securitization in the European Union, Report 25», in tni 11.09.2018.
  • BHABHA,J.,SHUTTER,S.,Women's Movement: Women under Immigration, Nationalityand Refugee Law, United Kingdom, 1994.
  • BLOCK,L., «On Female Victims and Parallel Worlds: Gender and Ethnicity in Policy Frames of Spousal Migration in Germany», in Contesting Integration, Engendering Migration(2014), pp. 242‒260.
  • BOYD,M.,GRIECO,E.,«Women and migration: incorporating gender into international migration theory», in Migration information source1.35 (2003), p. 28.
  • BURASCHI,D.,AGUILAR IDÁNEZ,M.J., «Indiferencia, fronteras morales y estrategias de resistencia», in Documentación Social180 (2016), p. 134.
  • BUZAN,B.,WÆVER,O.,DE WILDE,J., Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Chile 1998, p.14.
  • DOEZEMA,J.,«Ouch! Western feminists '‘wounded attachment to the ‘third world prostitute’», in Feminist Review 67.1 (2001), pp. 16-38.
  • DONATO,K.M., GABACCIA,D., HOLDAWAY,J., MANALANSAN,M., PESSAR,P.R., «A Glass Half Full? Gender in Migration Studies», in International Migration Review 40.1 (2006), p. 6.
  • FINEMAN,M.A., «The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition», in Yale Journal of Law and feminism 20 (2008), pp. 8-9.
  • FREEDMAN,J.,«Sexual and gender-based violence against refugee women: a hidden aspect of therefugee" crisis"», in Reproductive health matters 24.47 (2016), pp. 18-26.
  • GERARD,A.,The securitization of migration and refugee women, London 2014.
  • GREEN,N.L., «Changing Paradigms in Migration Studies: From Men to Women to Gender», in Gender & History 24. 3(2012), pp.782-798.
  • GUERRY,L., Le genre de l’immigration et de la naturalisation, Lyon, 2013.
  • HAGELUND,A.,«For Women and Children’ The Family and Immigration Politics in Scandinavia», in The Family in Question: Immigrant and Ethnic Minorities in Multicultural Europe, Chicago 2008, p. 72.
  • HARZIG,C., Immigration policies: a gendered historical comparison. In Crossing Borders and Shifting Boundaries. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden 2003, p. 35.
  • HIRATA,L.C., «Free, Indentured, Enslaved: Chinese Prostitutes in Nineteenth-Century America», in Journal of Women in Culture and Society5.1(1979), pp. 3-29.
  • HUNGER,D., «Women in Migration», in International Migration Review 01.09.2018 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/i323462].
  • HUYSMANS,J.,The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU, London 2006.
  • IOM.,«World Migration Report», in publications.iom 01.09.2018.[available at: https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2018_en.pdf.].
  • JONES,R., Violent Borders, Londres 2016.
  • KHALIL,Z., «Security for Whom? Unpacking the Gendered Impact of EU Securitized Migration», in Jadaliyya 29.08.2018 [http://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/34701].
  • KOFMAN,E.,«Family-Related Migration: A Critical Review of European Studies», in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30.2 (2004), pp. 243–262.
  • KOFMAN,E., «Gendered Labour Migrations in Europe and Emblematic Migratory Figures», in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39.4 (2013), pp. 579-600.
  • KOFMAN,E., SAHARSO,S., VACCHELLI,E., «Gendered perspectives on integration discourses and measures», in International migration53.4 (2015), p. 78.
  • KOSNICK,K., «Sexuality and Migration Studies: The Invisible, the Oxymoronic and Heteronormative Othering», in Framing Intersectionality: Debates on a Multi-Faceted Concept in Gender Studies, Farnham 2010, pp. 121-135.
  • LUTHMAN,I., The Gendered Implications of Securitized Migration: A qualitative look at how the securitization of migration affects women's experiences of seeking asylum in one of the world'smost gender equal countries, Upsala 2017.
  • LYON,D., «The Organization of Care Work in Italy: Gender and Migrant Labor in the New Economy», in Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies13.1(2006), pp. 207-224.
  • MAHLER,S.J.,PESSAR,P.R.,«Gender Matters: Ethnographers Bring Gender from the Periphery toward the Core of Migration Studies», in The International Migration Review40.1 (2006), pp. 27-63.
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES., «Calais Jungle», MSF19.07.2018[https://www.msf.org/france-msf-continues-assist-refugees-calais].
  • MERINO SANCHO,V., «El sistema Europeo Común de Asilo ante las demandas de asilo por razones de género», in Documentación social180 (2016), pp. 185-201.
  • MERRI,S., Gender violence: A cultural perspective, Chichester 2009, p. 206.
  • MOHANTY,C,T., Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity, Duke 2003.
  • MOHANTY,C,T.,«Imperial Democracies, Militarized Zones, Feminist Engagements», in Economic and Political Weekly of India46.13(2011) pp. 76-84.
  • MOHANTY,C,T., «Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses», inboundary 2.12(1986), p. 333-358.
  • MOROKVAŠIĆ,M., «Birds of Passage Are Also Women...», in International Migration Review 18 (1984), pp. 886-907.
  • MOROKVAŠIĆ,M., «Gendering Migration», in Migracijske i etničke teme 30 (2014), p. 371.
  • MOROKVAŠIĆ,M.,«Invisibilité continue, Cahiers du genre», in Migrantes et mobilisées 51(2011), pp. 25-47.
  • MOROKVAŠIĆ,M., «Migration, Gender, Empowerment», in Gender Orders Unbound: Globalisation, Restructuring and Reciprocity, Farmington Hills 2007.
  • MOROKVAŠIĆ,M.,«Settled in Mobility: Engendering Post-wall Migration in Europe», in Feminist Review 77.1(2004), pp.7-25.
  • OLWIG,K,F., «Integration’: Migrants and Refugees between Scandinavian Welfare Societies and Family Relations», in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37. 2 (2010), pp.179-196.
  • OTTO,D.,«Lost in translation: re-scribing the sexed subjects of international human rights law», in International Law and its others, Cambridge 2006, pp. 318-356.
  • PERONI,L., «Violence against migrant women: The Istanbul convention through a postcolonial feminist lens», in Feminist Legal Studies24.1(2016), pp. 49-67.
  • ROE,P.,«Gender and 'positive' security», in International Relations 26(2014), p.117.
  • RUFFER,G,B., «Pushed Beyond Recognition? The Liberality of Family Reunification Policies in the EU», in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37 (2011), pp. 935–51.
  • RUIZ GIMÉNEZ ARRIETA,I.,«El naufragio de Europa: reflexiones feministas en torno a la crisis de las políticas migratorias y de asilo», in Revista Europea de derechos fundamentales29 (2017), p. 151.
  • SHAMIR,R., «Without Borders ? Notes on Globalization as a Mobility Regime», in Sociological theory 23. 2 (2016), pp. 197-217. 28.
  • SCHEIBELHOFER,P., «Integrating the Patriarch? Constructs of Migrant Masculinity in Times of Managing Migration and Integration», in Contesting Integration, Engendering Migration, Basingstoke 2014, pp. 185-201.
  • SCHOLTEN,P., ENTZINGER,H. ,KOFMAN,E., HOLLOMEY,C. ,LECHNER,C., VACCHELLI,E., KRALER,A., «Integration from abroad? Perception and Impactsof pre-entry tests for third country nationals», in PROSINT Comparative Reports WP4 (2012), pp. 1-94.
  • SCHROVER,M.,SCHINKEL,W.,«Introduction: the language of inclusion and exclusion in the context of immigration and integration», in Ethnic and Racial Studies36.7 (2013), pp. 1123-1141.
  • SCULLY,P.,«Vulnerable women: A critical reflections on human rights discourse and sexual violence», in Emory International Law Review 23 (2009), pp. 113-123.
  • TICKNER,J.A., «You Just Don't Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists», in International Studies Quarterly(1997), pp. 611-632.
  • UNHCR., «Atto Finale della Conferenza dei Plenipotenziari delle Nazioni Unite sullo Status dei Rifugiati e degli Apolidi e Testo della Convenzione del 1951 relativa allo Status dei Rifugiati», in interno.gov[http://www.interno.gov.it/.]
  • UNHCR., «Convention and/or the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 april 2018», in refworld 15.09.2018 [http://www.refworld.org].
  • VALLET,E. ,Borders, Fences and Walls, London 2014.
  • WATSON,S.D., The securitization of humanitarian migration: Digging moats and sinking boats, London 2009.
  • YARRIS,K.,CASTAÑEDA,H.,«Special issue discourses of displacement and deservingness: Interrogating distinctions between “economic” and “forced” migration», in International Migration53.3 (2015), p. 65.
  • YUVAL DAVIS,N.,«The ‘multi-layered citizen’: citizenship in the age of ‘glocalization’», in International Feminist Journal of Politics 1.1 (1999), pp. 119–136.
  • ZACHER,M.W., «The territorial integrity norm: international boundaries and the use of force», in International Organization 55. 2 (2001), pp. 215-