El desarrollo y los campos de Influencia

  1. Sergio Soza-Amigo 1
  2. Patricio Aroca 2
  3. José M. Rueda-Cantuche 3
  1. 1 Universidad Austral de Chile
    info

    Universidad Austral de Chile

    Valdivia, Chile

    ROR https://ror.org/029ycp228

  2. 2 Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez
    info

    Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

    Santiago de Chile, Chile

    ROR https://ror.org/0326knt82

  3. 3 European Comission
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Investigaciones Regionales = Journal of Regional Research

ISSN: 1695-7253,  2340-2717

Year of publication: 2018

Issue: 40

Pages: 7-34

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Investigaciones Regionales = Journal of Regional Research

Abstract

By using OECD Input-Output in three different periods of time: mid-1990’s, beginning and end of the 2000’s, we discuss the evolution of their economic structures and their sectors along with a comparison among their structural similarities, measures by their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in purchaser’s power parities (ppp). Structural changes and similarities are discussed using fields of influence. The results revealed that economies tend to be stable in their structures depending on their level of development and the profusion of their fields of influence, with the exception of two countries with low GDP per capita but economic structures of developed countries.

€ View funding

Funding information

Agradecemos a Fondecyt por financiar esta investigación por medio del proyecto «La Concentración y el Centralismo en Chile como Limitantes de su Desarrollo y Promotores de la Inequidad Socioterritorial» (proyecto núm. 1171230).

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Alatriste-Contreras, M. (2015): «The Relationship Between the Key Sectors in the European Union Economy and the Intra-European Union Trade», Journal of Economic Structures, 4(14), 1-24.
  • Alonso, J. (2007): «Fragmentación Productiva Multilocalización y Proceso de Internalización de la Empresa», ICE: Revista de Economía, septiembre-octubre (838), 23-39.
  • Aroche, F. (1996): «Important Coefficients and Structural Change: A multi-layer approach», Economic Systems Research, 8(3), 235-247.
  • Aroche, F. (2002): «Structural Transformations and Important Coefficients in the North American Economies», Economic Systems Research, 14(3), 257-273.
  • Aroche, F. (2005): «Desintegración en la Estructura Productiva Mexicana y el Empleo. Los Coeficientes Importantes y su Importancia en la Integración», en I Jornadas de Análisis Input-Output, España: Universidad de Oviedo, 22-23 de septiembre.
  • Aroche, F. (2006): «Trees of the Essential Economic Structures: A qualitative input-output method», Journal of Regional Science, 46(2), 333-353.
  • Arto, I., Rueda-Cantuche, J. M., Amores, A., Dietzenbacher, E., Sousa, N., Montinari, L., y Markandya, A. (2015): EU Exports to the World: Effects on Employment and Income, Luxemburgo: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Brown, D., Riolo, R., Robinson, D., North, M. y Rand, W. (2005): «Spatial Process and Data Models: Toward integration of agent-based models and GIS», Journal of Geograph Systems, 7, 25-47.
  • Carter, A. (1970): Structural Change in the American Economy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Castell-Quintana, D., y Royuela, V. (2012): «Desempleo y Crecimiento Económico a Largo Plazo, Investigaciones Regionales, 24, 153-173.
  • Clark, C. (1940): The Conditions of Economic Progress, London: Macmillian.
  • Dietzenbacher, E. (2002): «Interregional Multipliers: Looking backward, Looking Forward», Regional Studies, 36(2): 125-136.
  • Dietzenbacher, E., Bart, L., Stehrer, R., Timmer, M., y Vries, G. (2013): «The construction of World Input-Output Tables in the WIOD Project», Economic Systems Research, 25(1), 71-98.
  • Dietzenbacher, E., y Temurshoev, U. (2012): «Input-Output Analysis in Current or Constant Prices: Does it matter?», Journal of Economic Structures, 1(4): 1-18.
  • Dietzenbacher, E., y van der Linden, (1997): «Sectorial and Spatial Linkages in the EC Production Structure», Journal of regional Science, 37(2): 235-257.
  • Duman, A., y Ertan, G. (2015): «Input-Output Networks and Growth Performances Across Countries», Working Papers in Economics, noviembre, 15/04.
  • Escribá, F. J. y Murgui, M. J. (2013): «Productividad y Empleo Regional en España: Un enfoque dinámico», Investigaciones Regionales, 27, 65-89.
  • Fally, T. (2012): On the Fragmentation of Production in the US, University of Colorado-Boulder, julio.
  • Fernández, R., y Palazuelos, E. (2010): «Labour Productivity and Sectorial Structures in European Economies», Revista de Economía Mundial, 24, 213-243.
  • Fisher, A. G. B. (1939): «Production, Primary, Secondary and Tertiary», The Economic Record, 15(1), 24-38.
  • Forsell, O. (1988): «Growth and Changes in the Structure of the Finnish Economy in the 1960s and 1970s», en Ciaschini, M. (ed.), Input-Output Analysis, New York: Chapman and Hall, 1988, pp. 287-302.
  • Foster, N., Stehrer, R., y Timmer, M. (2013): «International Fragmentation od Production, Trade and Growth: Impacts and propects for EU member states», European Economy: Economic Papers, 484 (abril).
  • Fourastié, J. (1949): Le Grand Espoir du XXe Siècle, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • García, A., Morillas A., y Ramos, C. (2008): «Key Sectors a New Proposal from the Network Theory», Regional Studies, 42(7), 1013-1130.
  • Hewings, G., Fonseca, M., Guilhoto, J., y Sonis, M. (1989): «Key Sectors and Structural Change in the Brazilian Economy: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and their Policy Implications», Journal of Policy Modeling, 11(1), 67-90.
  • Hewings, G., Sonis, M., Guo, J., Israilevich P., y Schindler, G. (1998): «The Hollowing out Process in the Chicago Economy: 1975-2011», Geographical Analysis, 30(3), 217-233.
  • Hewings, G., Sonis, M., y Jensen, J. (1988): «Fields of Influence of Technological Change in Input-Output Models», Papers of the Regional Science Association, 64: 25-36.
  • Hidalgo, C., y Hausmann, R. (2009): «The building blocks of economic complexity», Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA (PNAS), 106(26), 10570-10575.
  • Hidalgo, C., Klinger, B., Barabási, A.-K., y Hausmann, R. (2007): «The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations», Science, 317, 482-487.
  • Hirschman, A. (1958): The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven, Connecticut, USA: Yale University Press.
  • Holub, H., y Schnabl, H. (1994): Input-Output-Rechnung: Input-Output Analyse, München: Oldenbourg-Verlag.
  • Imbs, J., y Wacziarg, R. (2003): «Stages of Diversification», The American Economic Journal, 93(1), 63-86.
  • Jensen, R. C., West, G. R., y Hewings, G. (1988): «The Study of Regional Economic Structure Using Input-Output Tables», Regional Studies, 22, 209-220.
  • Jones, R., y Kierzkowski, H. (2005): «International Fragmentation and the Economic Geography», North American Journal of Economies and Finance, 16, 1-10.
  • Lauritzen, F. (1989): «An investigation of Danish input-output tables 1966-1985», en Nineth International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Kezthely, 4-9 septiembre.
  • Le Masne, P. (1988): «Le système productif français face a ses voisins européens», Paris: Troisième Colloque de Comptabilité Nationale, 12-14 de diciembre.
  • Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., y Gerschke, A. (2013): «Building Eora: A Global Multi-Region Input-Output Database at High Country and Sector Resolution», Economic Systems Research, 25 (1), 20-49.
  • Leontief, W. (1963): «The Structure of Development», Scientific American, 209, pp. 148-166.
  • van der Linden, J., Oosterhaven, J., y Cuello, F. (2000): «Fields of Influence of Productivity Change in EU Intercountry Input-Output Tables, 1979-80», Environment and Planning A, 32: 1287-1305.
  • López, A. M., y Pulido, A. (1993): «Análisis de las interrelaciones sectoriales en España», Economía Industrial, 290, 167-178.
  • Nogurera-Méndez, P., y Semitiel-García, M. (2011): «The Embeddedness of the Agro-Food System in the Spanish Interindustrial Structure», International Regional Science Review, 34(1), 34-74.
  • Morillas, A. (2005): «Cambios en la Estructura Productiva Española, 1980-1995. Un Análisis Estructural Mediante la Teoría de Grafos», en Tarancón, M.-A., y Ramos, C., Estructura Input-Output y Dinámica Económica, España: Editorial Club Universitario (ECU), pp. 81-118.?
  • Panggabean, M. (2004): «Regional Growth: Economically Important Sectors», ISEAS Working Paper: Visiting Researchers Series, núm. 1, 33 p.
  • Pellegrini, J. L., y Platino, M. (2014): «El Patrón de Desigualdad en la Distribución Espacial de la Industria Manufacturera Argentina (1973-2003)», Investigaciones Regionales, 28, 159-170.
  • Petty, W. (1899): The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, C. H. Hull (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vol. 1.
  • Pulido, A., y Fontela, E. (1993): Análisis Input-Output. Modelos Datos y Aplicaciones, España: Pirámide.
  • Rao, V., y Harmston, F. (1979): «Identification of Key Sectors in a Region of a Developed Economy», Annals of Regional Science, 13(3), 78-90.
  • Schintke, J., y Stäglin, R. (1988): «Important Input Coefficients in Market Transaction Tables and Production Flow Tables», en Ciaschini, M. (ed.), Input-Output Analysis, Nueva York: Chapman and Hall, pp. 43-60.
  • Schnabl, H. (1994): «The Evolution of Production Structures, Analysed by a Multi-Layer Procedure», Economic Systems Research, 6(19), 51-69.
  • Sebald, A. (1974): An Analysis of the Sensitivity of Large Scale Input-Output Models to Parametric Uncertainties, Center for Advanced Computation, documento núm. 122, University of Illinois at Urbana.
  • Soza-Amigo, S. (2011): «Linkages and Structural Similarities for the Regions of Chile», Economic Analysis Review, 26(2), 81-110.
  • Soza-Amigo, S., y Aroca, P. (2015): Identifying a Country As «Developed» Based On Their Structural Similarities», descargado de https://www.researchgate.net/publica-tion/313388956_Identifying_a_Country_As_Developed_Based_On_Their_Structural_ Similarities, 2 de febrero de 2017.
  • Soza-Amigo, S., y Ramos, C. (2011): «The Aggregation in the Input-Output Model: A review from the perspective of the branches that do not join», Revista de Economía Mundial, 28, 247 – 276.
  • Tarancón, M. (2003): Técnicas de Análisis Económico Input-Output, Alicante: Editorial Club Universitario, 269 p.
  • Thakur, S. (2010): «Identification of Regional Fundamental Economic Structure (FES): An Input-Output and Field of Influence Approach», en Santos-Paulino, A. U., y Wan, G. (eds.), The Rise of China and India: Impacts, prospects and implications, Palgrave-Macmillan, 312 pp.
  • Thakur, S. (2011): «Fundamental Economic Structure and Structural Change in Regional Economies: A methodological approach», Région et Développement, 33, 9-38.
  • Thakur, S., y Alvayay, J. (2012): «Identification of Regional Fundamental Economic Structure (FES) of Chilean Economy: A field of Influence approach», Structural Change and economic Dynamics, 23: 92-107.
  • Tukker, A., De Koning, Wood, A., Hawkins, R., Lutter, T., Acosta, S, Rueda-Cantuche, J. M., Bouwmeester, M. C., Oosterhaven, J., Drosdowski, T., y Kuenen, J. (2013): «EXIOPOL-Development and Illustrative Analyses of a Detailed Global MR EE SUT/IOT», Economic Systems Research, 25 (1), 50-70.
  • Tilanus, C. (1966): Input-Output Experiments, Rotterdam University Press.
Data source: Dialnet