Formas de pedir castigo penal. Expresiones del punitivismo según grados de especificidad

  1. Pozo Cuevas, Federico 1
  2. Caro Cabrera, Manuel Jesús 1
  3. López Menchón, Alejandro 2
  4. Navarro Ardoy, Luis 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

  2. 2 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

Journal:
Papers: revista de sociología

ISSN: 0210-2862,  2013-9004

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 107

Issue: 2

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5565/REV/PAPERS.3018 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Papers: revista de sociología

Abstract

This paper studies the levels of punitiveness shown by the population when both global and specific measures are applied simultaneously. According to data from the 9th wave of the Citizen’s Panel for Social Research in Andalusia, Spain (Autumn 2019), the demand for tougher penalties is more pronounced when reacting to abstract crimes or criminals than specific cases and circumstances, or when choosing between the different types of legal punishment. However, it cannot be argued that global measures in the data generally show higher levels of punitiveness than specific ones, as this difference rests on the measure’s type of specificity. The most accentuated form of punitiveness is manifested through the acceptance of tougher penal treatment in the face of specific crimes. This assertion contradicts some of the findings made by the literature, although it could be explained by the social salience that the crimes used in the measures —violent and sexual crimes— have achieved as of lately.

Bibliographic References

  • Aizpurúa, Eva (2015a). «Delimitando el punitivismo: las actitudes de los españoles hacia el castigo de los infractores juveniles y adultos». Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica, 13, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.46381/reic.v13i0.90
  • Aizpurúa, Eva (2015b). Las actitudes punitivas de los españoles: alcance, medición y factores explicativos. Tesis doctoral. Fernández Molina, Esther (dir.). Albacete: Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
  • Aizpurúa, Eva y Fernández-Molina, Esther (2016). «Opinión pública hacia el castigo de los delincuentes: la importancia del delito cometido». Boletín Criminológico, 161, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.24310/boletin-criminologico.2016.v22i2016.7549
  • Antón-Mellón, Juan; Álvarez, Gema y Rothstein, Pedro (2017). «Populismo punitivo en España (1995-2015): presión mediática y reformas legislativas». Revista Española de Ciencia Política, (43), 13-36. https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.43.01
  • Applegate, Brandon K.; Davis, Robin K. y Cullen, Francis T. (2009). «Reconsidering child saving: The extent and correlates of public support for excluding youths from the juvenile court». Crime & Delinquency, 55 (1), 51-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128707308104
  • Beckett, Katherine y Sasson, Theodore (2000). The Politics of Injustice: Crime and Punishment in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Caro, Manuel; Pozo, Federico; López, Alejandro y Navarro, Luis (2020). Encuestas de seguridad ciudadana. Madrid: CIS.
  • Cullen, Francis T.; Fisher, Bonnie S. y Applegate, Brandon K. (2000). «Public Opinion about Punishment and Corrections». Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 27, 1-79. https://doi.org/10.1086/652198
  • DiStefano, Christine; Zhu, Min y Mîndrilă, Diana (2009). «Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher». Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14 (20), 1-11. Disponible en https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255643537_Understanding_and_Using_Factor_Scores_Considerations_for_the_Applied_Researcher
  • Fernández, Sheila (2019). «Feminismo punitivista». Andaina: Revista do Movemento Feminista Galego, 70, 32-38.
  • Fernández de la Reguera, Alethia (2019). «¿Es el enfoque punitivo una solución frente al acoso sexual?». Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios de Género de El Colegio de México, 5, e383. Epub 15 de febrero de 2020. Disponible en http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2395-91852019000100301
  • Frías, Dolores y Pascual, Marcos (2012). «Prácticas del análisis factorial exploratorio (AFE) en la investigación sobre conducta del consumidor y marketing». Suma Psicológica, 19 (1), 47-58. Disponible en https://www.uv.es/~friasnav/FriasNavarroMarcopsSoler.pdf
  • Garland, David W. (2003). La cultura del control. Crimen y orden social en la sociedad contemporánea. Barcelona: Gedisa.
  • Gelb, Karen (2006). Myths and Misconceptions: Public Opinion versus Public Judgment about Sentencing. Melbourne: Sentencing Advisory Council.
  • Gelb, Karen (2008). More Myths and Misconceptions. Melbourne: Sentencing Advisory Council.
  • Harris, Andrew y Socia, Kelly M. (2014). «What’s in a name? Evaluating the effects of the “sex offender” label on public opinions and beliefs». Sexual Abuse, 28 (7), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1079063214564391
  • Hough, Mike y Roberts, Julian V. (1999). «Sentencing Trends in Britain: Public Knowledge and Public Opinion». Punishment and Society, 1, 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624749922227685
  • Hough, Mike y Roberts, Julian V. (2004). Youth crime and youth justice: Public opinion in England and Wales. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Hough, Mike; Bradford, Ben; Jackson, Jonathan y Roberts, Julian V. (2013). Attitudes to sentencing and trust in Justice. Exploring trends from the Crime Survey for England and Wales. Londres: Ministry of Justice Analytical Series.
  • Hutton, Neil (2005). «Beyond populist punitiveness?». Punishment and Society, 7, 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474505053828
  • Jackson, Jonathan y Kuha, Jouni (2015). «How theory guides measurement: Examples from the study of public attitudes toward crime and policing». En: Bynum, T. S. y Huebner, B. M. (eds.). Handbook on Measurement Issues in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Nueva Jersey: John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118868799.ch17
  • Jerre, Kristina (2014). «More sanctions-less prison? A research note on the severity of sanctions proposed by survey participants and how it is affected by the option to combine a prison term with other sanctions». European Journal on Criminal Policy & Research, 20 (1), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-013-9215-5
  • King, Anna y Maruna, Shadd (2009). «Is a conservative just a liberal who has been mugged? Exploring the origins of punitive views». Punishment and Society, 11, 147-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474508101490
  • Larrauri, Elena (2006). «Populismo punitivo… y cómo resistirlo». Jueces para la Democracia, 55, 15-22.
  • Lee, Sang y Jennrich, Robert (1979). «A study of algorithms for covariance structure analysis with specific comparisons using factor analysis». Psychometrika, 44, 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294078
  • López, Pedro y Fachelli, Sandra (2015). Metodología de la investigación social cuantitativa. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Disponible en https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/caplli/2015/142928/metinvsoccua_cap3-11a2016v3.pdf
  • Maguire, Edward y Johnson, Devon (2015). «The structure of public opinion on crime policy: Evidence from seven Caribbean nations». Punishment & Society, 17 (4), 502-530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474515604385
  • Maruna, Shadd y King, Anna (2004). «Public Opinion and Community Penalties». En: Bottoms, A.; Rex, S. y Robinson, G. (eds.). Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure. Cullompton: Willan Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843925743-11
  • Nardo, Michela; Saisana, Michaela; Saltelli, Andrea; Tarantola, Stefano; Hoffmann, Anders y Giovannini, Enrico (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. París. OECD.
  • Núñez, Lucía (2019). «El giro punitivo, neoliberalismo, feminismos y violencia de género». Política y Cultura, 51, 55-81. Disponible en https://polcul.xoc.uam.mx/index.php/polcul/article/view/1376
  • Pickett, Justin T.; Mancini, Christina; Mears, Daniel P. y Gertz, Marc (2015). «Public (mis)understanding of crime policy: The effects of criminal justice experience and media reliance». Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26 (5), 500-522. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0887403414526228
  • Pozo, Federico; Navarro, Luis; Caro, Manuel y López, Alejandro (2020). «Grados y rasgos de la demanda de castigo penal. Actitudes punitivas en la población andaluza». Boletín Criminológico, 6 (194), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.24310/boletin-criminologico.2020.v26i2020.10660
  • Pozuelo, Laura (2013). La política criminal mediática, génesis, desarrollo y costes. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
  • Roberts, Julian V. (2004). «Public Opinion and Youth Justice». Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 31, 495-542. https://doi.org/10.1086/655347
  • Roberts, Julian V. y Hough, Mike (2011). «Custody or community? Exploring the boundaries of public punitiveness in England and Wales». Criminology & Criminal Justice, 11 (2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811405023
  • Rossi, Peter H. y Berk, Richard A. (1997). Just punishments: Federal guidelines and public views compared. Nueva York: Aldine De Gruyter.
  • Sandys, Marla y McGarrell, Edmund F. (1995). «Attitudes Toward Capital Punishment: Preference for the Penalty or Mere Acceptance?». Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 32 (2), 191-213. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022427895032002004
  • Stalans, Loretta (2002). «Measuring attitudes to sentencing». En: Roberts, J. V. y Hough, M. (eds.). Changing attitudes to punishment: Public opinion, crime and justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
  • Tufts, Jennifer y Roberts, Julian V. (2002). «Sentencing juvenile offenders: Comparing public preferences and judicial practice». Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13 (1), 46-64. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0887403402131004
  • Unnever, James D. y Cullen, Francis T. (2005). «Executing the innocent and support for capital punishment: Implications for public policy». Criminology & Public Policy, 4 (1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00002.x
  • Unnever, James D. y Cullen, Francis T. (2010). «The social sources of americans punitiveness: A test of three competing models». Criminology, 48 (1), 99-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00181.x
  • Varona, Daniel (2008). «Ciudadanos y actitudes punitivas. Un estudio piloto de población universitaria española». Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica, 6, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.46381/reic.v6i0.40
  • Varona, Daniel (2011). «Medios de comunicación y punitivismo». Indret: Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, 1. Disponible en https://indret.com/medios-de-comunicacion-y-punitivismo/
  • Varona, Daniel (2013). «Percepción y elección del castigo en España. Resultados a partir de la encuesta social europea (5.ª ed.)». Cuadernos de Política Criminal, 111, 145-193.
  • Varona, Daniel (2015). «Opinión pública y castigo: la investigación sobre las actitudes punitivas en España». En: Miró, F. et al. (eds.). Crimen, oportunidad y vida diaria. Madrid: Dykinson.
  • Viki, Tendayi y Bohner, Gerd (2009). «Achieving accurate assessment of attitudes toward the criminal justice system: Methodological issues». En: Wood, J. y Gannon, T. A. (eds.). Public opinion and criminal justice. Londres: Willan.
  • Warner, Kate y Davis, Julia (2012). «Using jurors to explore public attitudes to sentencing». British Journal of Criminology, 52 (1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2362736
  • Worthen, Meredith G. F.; Rodgers, Forrest R. y Sharp, Susan F. (2014). «Expanding the spectrum of attitudes toward the death penalty». Criminal Justice Review, 39 (2), 160-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016814529967
Data source: Dialnet