Sobre la Crítica de Raz a las Teorías Constitutivistas
- 1 Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, España
ISSN: 1885-589X
Argitalpen urtea: 2022
Zenbakia: 17
Orrialdeak: 707-711
Mota: Artikulua
Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista internacional de pensamiento político
Laburpena
This paper analyzes the criticism of Raz to Searle, based on the fact that the theory of constitutives rules of Searle leads us inevitably to consider all norms are really constitutives. We could say that even primary norms are constituting new realities, and the facts they regulate are per se institutional.
Erreferentzia bibliografikoak
- Austin, John, How to do things with words. Londres, Oxford University Press, 1962.
- González Lagier, Daniel, "Clasificar acciones. Sobre la crítica de Raz a las reglas constitutivas de Searle". En Doxa, 13 (1993), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA1993.13.14
- Rawls, John, "Two concepts of rules". En The Philosophical Review, 64 (1955), 3-32.
- Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice. Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 1971. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182230
- Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms. Londres, Hutchinson, 1975. Juan Ruiz Manero (trad.): Razón práctica y normas. Madrid, Centro de estudios constitucionales, 1991.
- Raz, Joseph, "Promises and Obligations". En: Hacker, P. / Raz, J., Law, Morality and Society. Essays in honour of H.L.A. Hart. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1977, 210-228.
- Ross, Alf, Directives and Norms. Londres, Routledge, 1968. José Hierro (trad.): Lógica de las normas. Madrid, Tecnos, 1971.
- Searle, John, "How to derive ought from is". En The Philosophical Review, 71 (1962), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183455
- Searle, John, Speech Acts. Londres, Cambridge University Press, 1969. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
- Searle, John, The Construction of Social Reality. Londres, Allen Lane, 1991.