Percepciones y opiniones de los estudiantes de Ciencias de la Salud de la Universidad de Sevilla sobre el tutelaje de prácticas
- Borrallo Riego, Álvaro
- María Dolores Guerra Martín Director
Defence university: Universidad de Sevilla
Fecha de defensa: 06 March 2020
- Antonio Claret García Martínez Chair
- José-Rafael González-López Secretary
- José Granero Molina Committee member
- Pablo Jesús López Soto Committee member
- Cayetano Fernández Sola Committee member
Type: Thesis
Abstract
The perceptions and opinions of the students of Health Sciences have been analyzed, specifically the degrees of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, of the University of Seville on the tutelage of clinical practices. The sample has been characterized according to the sociodemographic variables, and compared between the different degrees. A non-experimental, cross-sectional, correlational design research was carried out during the 2018/2019 year. The sample was composed of 134 students, to these a questionnaire was applied, previously validated. Closed questions were processed by Statgraphics Staturion XVI statistical package. As for open questions, the Atlas.ti version 8 software program has been used for qualitative and categorical analysis of textual data. It has been observed that mostly clinical tutors are organized in their activities, punctual and are available for student care. In general, it has been the Nursing students who have obtained the best scores in the different variables (except for two), while the Physiotherapy students obtained lower scores in the different variables, except for four, in which the Podiatry students showed lower scores. Significant differences were detected among students' opinions based on the degree of origin. The students were quite / very satisfied with the tutelage of clinical practices, about 65% of Nursing, 45% of Podiatry, and somewhat less than 20% of Physiotherapy. By degrees, in Nursing 28 comments were obtained, with about 68% negative, in Physiotherapy 78, of which, slightly more than 73% were negative, and in Podiatry 25 comments, with 88% negative.