Justicia del agua transfronterizauna lectura combinada de la literatura crítica sobre la interacción del agua transfronteriza y la ‘justicia’, para el análisis y la diplomacia

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abitbol, E. (2010). Developing water and marginalising Israel/Palestinian peace: a critical examination of the Red Sea – Dead Sea canal feasibility process. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 5(1), 35–49.
• Allan, J. A. (2001). The Middle East Water Question: Hydropolitics and the Global Economy. I.B. Tauris, London.
• Asmal, K. (2004). Water in Civil Society: Arid African Upstream Safari: a Transboundary Expedition to Seek and Share New Sources of Water. Water and Ethics. UNESCO, Paris.
• Bachrat, P. & Baratz, M. S. (1962). The two faces of power. American Political Science Review 56, 941–952.
• Bandyopadhyay, J. & Ghosh, N. (2009). Holistic engineering and hydro-diplomacy in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Basin. Economic & Political Weekly XLIV(45), 50–60.
• Brochmann, M. (2012). Basin Asymmetries and the Risk of Conflict in International River Basins. In Bridge Over Troubled Waters: Interaction in International River Basins. PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
• Brooks, D. B. (2005). Beyond greater efficiency: the concept of water soft paths. Canadian Water Resources Journal 30(1), 83–92.
• Cascão, A. E. (2003). Hydropolitics in Ethiopia. Master’s thesis. Lisbon University, Lisbon.
• Cascão, A. E. (2009a). Changing power relations in the Nile river basin: unilateralism vs. cooperation? Water Alternatives 2(2), 245–268.
• Cascão, A. E. (2009b). Political Economy of Water Resources Management and Allocation in the Eastern Nile River Basin. Department of Geography, King’s College London, London.
• Cascão, A. E. (2014). Countering Hydro-Hegemony in the Nile Basin. Presentation given at Seventh International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, 12–13 May 2014. London UEA Water Security Research Centre / London Water Research Group.
• Chupp, M. (1991). When mediation is not enough. Conciliation Quarterly 10(3), 2–13.
• Clayton, S. (1998). Preference for macrojustice versus microjustice in environmental decisions. Environment and Behavior 30, 162–183.
• Conker, A. (2014). An enhanced notion of power for inter-state and transnational hydropolitics: An analysis of Turkish-Syrian water relations and the Ilisu Dam. PhD thesis, School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
• Cooke, B. & Kothari, U. (eds) (2001). Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed Books, London.
• D’Souza, R. (2008). Liberal theory, human rights and water-justice: back to square one? Law, Social Justice & Global Development Journal 2008(1). Available at: http://www.go.warwick.ac.uk/elj/lgd/2008_1/dsouza.
• Daoudy, M. (2008). Hydro-hegemony and international water law: laying claims to water rights. Water Policy 10(S2), 89–102.
• Daoudy, M. (2009). Asymmetric power: negotiating water in the Euphrates and Tigris. International Negotiation 14, 361–391.
• Davidson-Harden, A., Naidoo, A. & Harden, A. (2007). The geopolitics of the water justice movement. Peace, Conflict and Development 11, 1–34.
• De Stefano, L., Duncan, J., Dinar, S., Stahl, K., Strzepek, K. & Wolf, A. T. (2010). Mapping the Resilience of International River Basins to Future Climate Change-Induced Water Variability. Water Sector Board Discussion Paper No. 15, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Delli-Priscoli, J. & Wolf, A. (2008). Managing and Transforming Water Conflicts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
• Delli-Priscoli, J., Dodge, J. & Llamas, R. (2004). Water and Ethics: Overview. Series on Water and Ethics, Essay 1. UNESCO, Paris.
• Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: what determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues 31(3), 137–149.
• Dicochea, P. R. (2012). Collaboration and compromise at the Borderlands: the Cal/EPA’s pilot project for the New River. Environmental Justice 5(1), 21–25.
• Dieperink, C. (2011). International water negotiations under asymmetry: lessons from the Rhine chlorides dispute settlement (1931–2004). International Environmental Agreements 11(2), 139–157.
• Dinar, A., Katz, D., De Stefano, L. & Blankspoor, B. (2012). Climate Change, Conflict, and Cooperation: Global Analysis of the Resilience of International River Treaties to Increased Water Variability. Rethinking Climate Change, Conflict, and Security Conference, University of Sussex, UK, 18–19 October 2012.
• Dinar, S. (2009). Power asymmetry and negotiations in international river basins. International Negotiation 14(2), 329–360.
• Dinar, S. & Dinar, A. (2000). Negotiating in international watercourses: diplomacy, conflict and cooperation. International Negotiation 5, 193–200.
• Drieschova, A. & Fischhendler, I. (2012). A Toolkit of Mechanisms to Reduce Uncetainy in International Water Treaties. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem – CLICO project, Jerusalem.
• Drieschova, A., Fischhendler, I. & Giordano, M. (2011). The role of uncertainties in the design of international water treaties: an historical perspective. Climatic Change 105, 387–408.
• Duarte Lopes, P. (2012). Governing Iberian Rivers: from bilateral management to common basin governance? International Environmental Agreements 12(3), 251–268.
• Eissa, S. (2008). International law and hydro-hegemony in the Nile Basin: a Sudanese perspective. Water Policy 10(S2), 29–49.
• Falkenmark, M. & Folke, C. (2002). The ethics of soci-ecohydrological catchment management: towards hydrosolidarity. Hydrology and Earth Systems Sciences 6(1), 1–9.
• FE (2012). Exploring the Links Between Water and Economic Growth: a Report Prepared for HSBC. HSBC Water Programme. Frontier Economics Ltd, London.
• Feitelson, E. & Rosenthal, G. (2012). Desalination, space and power: the ramifications of Israel’s changing water geography. Geoforum 43, 272–284.
• Finocchiaro, M. A. (1999). Beyond Right and Left: Democratic Elitism in Mosca and Gramsci. Yale University, New Haven, CT.
• Fox, C. A. & Sneddon, C. (2007). Transboundary river basin agreements in the Mekong and Zambezi basins: enhancing environmental security or securitizing the environment? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 7(3), 237–261.
• Furlong, K. (2008). Hidden theories, troubled waters: response to critics. Political Geography 27, 811–814.
• Gerlak, A. K., Lautze, J. & Giordano, M. (2011a). Water resources data and information exchange in transboundary water treaties. International Environmental Agreements 11, 179–199.
• Gerlak, A. K., Varady, R. G., Petit, O. & Haverland, A. C. (2011b). Hydrosolidarity and beyond: can ethics and equity find a place in today’s water resource management? Water International 36(3), 251–265.
• Gleick, P. (1998). Water in crisis: paths to sustainable water use. Freshwater Systems 8(3), 571–579.
• Goff, M. & Crow, B. (2014). What is water equity? The unfortunate consequences of a global focus on ‘drinking water’. Water International 39(2), 159–171.
• Islam, S. & Susskind, L. E. (eds) (2012). Water Diplomacy: A Negotiated Approach to Managing Complex Water Network. RFF Press, New York.
• ISRIC (2008). Green Water Credits. World Soil Information Policy Brief. ISRIC – World Soil Information, supported by the International Fund for Agricultural Development, Nairobi.
• Johnson, C., Penning-Rowsell, E. & Parker, D. (2007). Natural and imposed injustices: the challenges in implementing ‘fair’ flood risk management in England. The Geographical Journal 173(4), 374–390.
• Jones, S. (2006). Antonio Gramsci. Routledge, Oxford.
• Joy, K. J., Kulkarni, S., Roth, D. & Zwarteveen, M. (2014). Re-politicising water governance: exploring water re-allocations in terms of justice. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.870542.
• Julien, F. (2012). Hydropolitics is what societies make of it (or why we need a constructivist approach to the geopolitics of water). International Journal of Sustainable Society 4(1/2), 45–71.
• Karim, T. (2008). The Ganges treaty: parsing the dynamics of the final negotiations: what have we learned from it? Journal of Bangladesh Studies 10(2), 8–22.
• Kistin, E. J., Ashton, P. J., Earle, P., Malzbender, D., Patrick, M. J. & Turton, A. R. (2009). An overview of the content and historical context of the international freshwater agreements that South Africa has entered into with neighbouring countries. International Environmental Agreements 9(1), 1–21.
• Laswell, H. (1936). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. Whittlesey House, McGraw-Hill Books, London.
• Lederach, J. P. (2003). The Little Book of Conflict Transformation. Good Books, Intercourse, PA.
• Leopold, A. (1989). A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Lu, F., Ocampo-Raeder, C. & Crow, B. (2014). Equitable water governance: future directions in the understanding and analysis of water inequities in the global South. Water International 39(2), 129–142.
• Lukes, S. (2005 [1974]). Power: A Radical View. 2nd edn, Palgrave MacMillan, Hampshire, UK.
• Matthews, N. & Schmidt, J. (2014). False promises: the contours, contexts and contestation of good water governance in Lao PDR and Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Water Governance (Special Issue on Anarchy: The ‘Dark’ Side of Water Governance?), 2(1).
• McCaffrey, S. (2007). The Law of International Watercourses. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• McCaffrey, S. C. (2011). The International Law Commission’s flawed Draft Articles on the Law of Transboundary Aquifers: the way forward. Water International 36(5), 566–572.
• McIntyre, O. (2010). International water law: concepts, evolution and development. In: Transboundary Water Management: Principles and Practice. Earle, A., Jägerskog, A. & Ojendal, J. (eds). Earthscan, London, pp. 60–71.
• McLean, J. (2007). Water injustice and potential remedies in indigenous rural contexts: a water justice analysis. Environmentalist 27, 25–38.
• Mehta, L., Allouche, J., Nicol, A. & Walnycki, A. (2014). Global environmental justice and the right to water: the case of periurban Cochabamba and Delhi. Geoforum 54 (Special Issue on Global Environmental Justice), 158–166.
• Mekonnen, D. Z. (2010). The Nile Basin cooperative framework agreement negotiations and the adoption of a ‘Water Security’ paradigm: flight into obscurity or a logical Cul-de-sac? European Journal of International Law 21, 421–440.
• Messerschmid, C. (2011). Nothing new in the Middle East – reality and discourses of climate change in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In: Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict: Challenges for Societal Stability. Scheffran, J., Brzoska, M., Brauch, H. G. & Link, P. M. (eds). Springer, Berlin.
• Messerschmid, C. (2012). The 2 Faces of Justice: Reflections for the Application to the Water Sector. Paper prepared in advance of the Sixth International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, University of East Anglia, London Campus, 12–13 January 2013.
• Mirumachi, N. (2007a). Fluxing relations in water history: Conceptualizing the range of relations in transboundary river basin. Pasts and futures of water. Proceedings from the 5th International Water History Association Conference, Tampere, Finland, 13–17 June 2006.
• Mirumachi, N. (2007b). Introducing Transboundary Waters Interaction NexuS (TWINS): Model of Interaction Dynamics in Transboundary Waters. Paper presented at the Third International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, London, 12–13 May 2007.
• Mirumachi, N. (2010). Study of Conflict and Cooperation in International Transboundary River Basins: The TWINS Framework. Department of Geography, King’s College London, London.
• Mirumachi, N. (2013a). Securitising shared waters: an analysis of the hydropolitical context of the Tanakpur Barrage project between Nepal and India. The Geographical Journal 179(4), 309–319.
• Mirumachi, N. (2013b). Transboundary water security: reviewing the importance of national regulatory and accountability capacities. In: Water Security: Principles, Perspectives, Practice. Lankford, B., Bakker, B. K., Zeitoun, M. & Conway, D. (eds). Routledge, London.
• Mirumachi, N. & Torriti, J. (2012). The use of public participation and economic appraisal for public involvement in largescale hydropower projects: case study of the Nam Theun 2 Hydropower Project. Energy Policy 47, 125–132.
• Molle, F. & Floch, P. (2008). The ‘Desert bloom’ syndrome: Irrigation development, politics, and ideology in the Northeast of Thailand. Paper, Chiang Mai, Mekong Program on Water, Environment and Resilience. Institut de recherche pour le developpement, International Water Management Institute, MPOWER, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
• Molle, F., Foran, T. & Floch, P. (2009). Introduction: changing waterscapes in the Mekong region – historical background and context. In: Contested Waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, Livelihoods and Governance. Molle, F., Foran, T.& Käkönen, M. (eds). Earthscan, London, pp. 1–13.
• Movik, S. (2014). A fair share? Perceptions of justice in South Africa’s water allocation reform policy. Geoforum 54(Special Issue on Global Environmental Justice), 187–195.
• Nicol, A. & Cascão, A. E. (2011). Against the flow – new power dynamics and upstream mobilisation in the Nile Basin. Review of African Political Economy 38(128), 317–325.
• Norman, E. S. (2012). Cultural Politics and Transboundary Resource Governance in the Salish Sea. Water Alternatives 5(1), 138–160.
• Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books, New York.
• Orwell, G. (1951). Animal Farm. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK.
• Patrick, M. J. (2012). Scale and Justice in Water Allocation. Faculty of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
• Patrick, M. J. (2014). The cycles and spirals of justice in water-allocation decision-making. Water International 39(1), 63–80.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Rieu-Clarke, A. & Loures, F. R. (2009). Still not in force: should states support the 1997 UN watercourses convention? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 18(2), 185–197.
• Rodríguez, I. & Correa, H. D. (2006). Lessons, approaches, and challenges to tranforming socio-environmental conflicts in Latin America: the ‘C&C’ program experience. In: Environmental Crossroads in Latin America: Between Managing and Transforming Natural Resource Conflicts. Correa, H. D. & Rodríguez, I. (eds). University for Peace, San José, Costa Rica.
• Sadoff, C. W. & Grey, D. (2002). Beyond the river: the benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy 4, 389–403.
• Salman, S. M. A. (2012). The Nile Basin cooperative framework agreement: a peacefully unfolding African spring? Water International 38(1), 17–29.
• Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics 13(3), 517–540.
• Scott, J. (2001). Power. Polity Press, London.
• Seckler, D., Molden, D. & Sakthivadivel, R. (2003). The concept of efficiency in water resources management and policy. In: Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. Kijne, J. W., Barker, R. & Molden, D. (eds). CABI, IWMI, Colombo.
• Selby, J. (2007). Beyond Hydro-Hegemony: Transnational Hegemonic Structures and National Hegemonic Projects. Presentation given at the Third International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, London School of Economics, London, UK, London Water Research Group, 12 and 13 May 2007.
• Selby, J. (2013). Cooperation, domination and colonisation: the Israeli-Palestinian joint water committee. Water Alternatives 6(1), 1–24.
• Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Sinha, U. K. (2012). Examining China’s hydro-behaviour: peaceful or assertive? Strategic Analysis 36(1), 41–56.
• Sneddon, C. & Fox, C. (2006). Rethinking transboundary waters: a critical hydropolitics of the Mekong basin. Political Geography 25, 181–202.
• Sneddon, C. & Fox, C. (2008). Struggles over dams as struggles for justice: the World Commission on Dams (WCD) and antidam campaigns in Thailand and Mozambique. Society and Natural Resources 21, 625–640.
• Suhardiman, D. & Giordano, M. (2012). Process-focused analysis in transboundary governance research. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 12(3), 299–308.
• Swanson, T. (2001). Negotiating effective international environmental agreements: is an objective approach to differential treatment possible? International Environmental Agreements 1, 125–153.
• Syme, G. J., Nancarrow, B. E. & McCreddin, J. A. (1999). Defining the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses. Journal of Environmental Management 57, 51–70.
• Tisdell, J. G. (2003). Equity and social justice in water doctrines. Social Justice Research 16(4), 401–416.
• Verhoeven, H. (2012). Water, Civilisation and Power: Sudan’s Hydropolitical Economy and the Al-Ingaz Revolution. Department of Politics & International Relations, Oxford University, Oxford.
• Warner, J. (2007). Hegemony and power. In: Presentation given at the Third International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, London School of Economics, London, UK. London Water Research Group, May 2007.
• Warner, J. (2008a). Asymmetry, inequality and inequity. In: Presentation given at Fourth International Workshop on HydroHegemony, London School of Economics, London. London Water Research Group, 31 May–1 June 2008.
• Warner, J. (2008b). The politics of flood insecurity: framing contested river management projects. Disaster Studies. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
• Warner, J. (2012). Three lenses on water war, peace and hegemonic struggle on the Nile. Journal of Social Sustainability 4(1–2), 173–193.
• Warner, J. & Zawahri, N. (2012). Hegemony and asymmetry: multiple-chessboard games on transboundary rivers. International Environmental Agreements 12, 215–229.
• WCD (2000). Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making (The Report of the World Commission on Dams). Earthscan, London.
• Whittington, D. (2004). Visions of Nile basin development. Water Policy 46, 24.
• Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B. & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: identifying basins at risk. Water Policy 5(1) 29–60.
• Woodhouse, M. (2004). Threshold, reporting and accountability for a right to water under international law. University of Denver Water Law Review 8(1).
• Woodhouse, M. & Zeitoun, M. (2008). Hydro-hegemony and international water law: grappling with the gaps. Water Policy 10(S2), 103–119.
• WRG (2010). Charting Our Water Future: Economic frameworks to inform decision-making. Water Resources Group: The Barilla Group, The Coca-Cola Company, The International Finance Corporation, McKinsey & Company, Nestlé S.A., New Holland Agriculture, SABMiller plc, Standard Chartered Bank, & Syngenta AG (a.k.a. ‘the McKinsey Report’), Washington, DC.
• Young, H. P. (1994). Equity: In Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
• Zeitoun, M. (2008). Power and Water: The Hidden Politics of the Palestinian–Israeli Conflict. I. B. Tauris, London.
• Zeitoun, M. (2013). Global environmental justice and international transboundary waters: an initial exploration. Geographical Journal 179(2), 141–149.
• Zeitoun, M. & McLaughlin, K. (2013). Basin justice: using social justice to address gaps in river basin management. In: Just Ecosystem Management. Sikor, T. (ed.). Routledge, Abingdon, UK and New York.
• Zeitoun, M. & Mirumachi, N. (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements 8(4), 297–316.
• Zeitoun, M. & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony: a framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts. Water Policy 8, 435–460.
• Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N. & Warner, J. (2011). Transboundary water interaction II: soft power underlying conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements 11(2), 159–178.
• Zwarteveen, M. & Boelens, R. (2011). La investigación interdisciplinaria referente a la temática de «justicia hídrica»: unas aproximaciones conceptuales (Interdisciplinary research on ‘Water Justice’: some conceptual approaches). In: Justicia Hídrica. Acumulación, Conflicto y Acción Social. Boelens, R., Cremers, L. & Zwarteveen, M. (eds). Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Fondo Editorial PUCP, Lima.