On the design of equity-oriented pharmaceutical copayments

  1. González Rodríguez, Paula 1
  1. 1 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

Revue:
SERIEs

ISSN: 1869-4187,  1869-4195

Année de publication: 2020

Volumen: 11

Número: 2

Pages: 179-202

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1007/S13209-019-00207-Y DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: SERIEs

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

In this paper, we propose a new approach to address the problem of designing pharmaceutical copayments. The rationale for positive copayments in our setting lies in the presence of budgetary constraints and, hence, in the need to raise funds in order to finance the costs of the treatments. We use results from the literature on axiomatic bargaining with claims to incorporate criteria of distributive justice into the design of copayments. We find that if the government constrains patient rights to what is medically feasible, equity-based copayments vary from a percentage of the cost of the treatment, to a flat rate per prescription. If the government also takes into account the burden of disease experienced by patients, then copayments based on equity lead to a relation between copayments and clinical status that diverges from those proposals based on efficiency arguments. In particular, we show that equity-based copayments might be increasing in the health gains that the treatments provide to the patients. The reason is that these copayments try to avoid a “double jeopardy” problem, by ensuring that those patients with a large burden of disease do not face also an important monetary cost.

€ Voir financement

Information sur le financement

Financeurs

Références bibliographiques

  • Baicker K, Goldman D (2011) Patient cost-sharing and healthcare spending growth. J Econ Perspect 25(2):47–68
  • Bossert W (1993) An alternative solution to bargaining problems with claims. Math Soc Sci 25:205–220
  • Chandra A, Gruber J, McKnight R (2010) Patient cost-sharing and hospitalization offsets in the elderly. Am Econ Rev 100(1):193–213
  • Chun Y, Thomson W (1992) Bargaining problems with claims. Math Soc Sci 24:19–33
  • Chernikovsky D (2000) The public-private mix in the modern health care system–concepts, issues and policy options revisited. NBER Working Paper, 7881
  • Clark D (1995) Priority setting in health care: an axiomatic bargaining approach. J Health Econ 14:345–360
  • Cuadras-Morató X, Pinto-Prades JL, Abellán-Perpiñan JM (2001) Equity considerations in health care: the relevance of claims. Health Econ 10:187–205
  • Culyer AJ, Wagstaff A (1993) Equity and equality in health and health care. J Health Econ 12:431–457
  • Diario Médico (2013) Feder pide que las enfermedades raras queden exentas de copagos. https://www.diariomedico.com/profesion/feder-pide-enfermedades-raras-queden-exentas-copagos.html . Accessed 1 Sept 2019
  • Donaldson C, Gerard K (2005) Economics of health care financing: the visible hand. Palgrave MacMillan, New York
  • Espin J, Rovira J (2007) Analysis of differences and commonalities in pricing and reimbursement systems in Europe. European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry, Brussels
  • Herrero C, Villar A (2001) The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. Math Soc Sci 42:307–328
  • Marco MC (1994) An alternative characterization of the extended claim-egalitarian solution. Econ Lett 45:41–46
  • Le Breton M, Sen A (1999) Separable preferences, strategyproofness, and decomposability. Econometrica 67(3):605–628
  • Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–162
  • Nord E (2005) Concerns for the worse off: fair innings versus severity. Soc Sci Med 60(2):257–263
  • Pauly MV (1968) The economics of moral hazard: comment. Am Econ Rev 58(3):531–537
  • Pauly MV, Blavin FE (2008) Moral hazard in insurance, value-based cost sharing, and the benefits of blissful ignorance. J Health Econ 27(6):1407–1417
  • Roth AE (1979) Axiomatic models of bargaining. Springer, Berlin
  • Smith PC (2005) User charges and priority setting in health care: balancing equity and efficiency. J Health Econ 24:1018–1029
  • Williams A (1974) Need as a demand concept (with special reference to health). In: Culyer AJ (ed) Economic policies and social goals. Martin Robertson, London, pp 11–38
  • Williams A (1997) Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the ‘fair innings’ argument. Health Econ 6:117–132
  • World Health Organization (2018) Medicines reimbursement policies in Europe. http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/medicines-reimbursement-policies-in-europe . Accessed 1 Sept 2019