La metodología de los Rough Sets como técnica de preprocesamiento de datosUna aplicación a las quiebras de microempresas familiares

  1. Vázquez Cueto, M. J. 1
  2. Irimia Diéguez, A. I. 1
  3. Blanco Oliver, A. J. 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

Journal:
Rect@: Revista Electrónica de Comunicaciones y Trabajos de ASEPUMA

ISSN: 1575-605X

Year of publication: 2015

Volume: 16

Issue: 1

Pages: 1-12

Type: Article

More publications in: Rect@: Revista Electrónica de Comunicaciones y Trabajos de ASEPUMA

Abstract

Micro enterprises (MEs) represent over 75 % of all enterprises in the EU, accounting for over 30 % of employment. However, since the onset of the economic crisis in 2008, this business segment has suffered high rates of bankruptcies and business closures, destroying many jobs. The construction of models that anticipate insolvency to allow sufficient time to take appropriate action is important to avoid bankruptcy of the MEs. However, it is difficult to obtain complete and relevant information for MEs, making it very difficult to be a good fit of the models for predicting corporate failure for this size of company. Applying Rough Sets technique as a method for pre - processing of the data, in the present study, we order the variables that best discriminate between solvent / insolvent in order to increase efficiency in predicting insolvency MEs. Additionally, we provide an application of the technique to family- MEs. Throughout this process, our results highlight the importance of considering non-financial variables to predict insolvency of MEs.

Bibliographic References

  • M.A. McPherson. Growth of micro and small enterprises in southern Africa Journal of Development Economics 48 (1996) 253–277.
  • D.C. Mead, y C. Liedholm. The Dynamics of Micro and Small Enterprises in Developing Countries. World Development 26 (1998) 161–74. Elsevier.
  • E.I. Altman, y G. Sabato. Modeling Credit Risk for SMEs: Evidence from US Market ABACUS 43(3) (2007) 332–357.
  • R. Carter y H.V. Auken. Small Firm Bankruptcy. Journal of Small Business Management 44(2006) 493–512.
  • A.N. Berger y W.S. Frame. Small Business Credit Scoring and Credit Availability. Journal of Small Business Management 45 (2007) 5–22.
  • S. Claessens, S. Djankov y L. Lang. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (2000) 81–112.
  • J. Fan y T. Wong. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (2001) 401–426.
  • B. Morten, K.M. Nielsen, F. Perez-Gonzalez y D. Wolfenzon. Inside the Family Firm: The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2) (2007) 647–691.
  • Z. Pawlak. Rough sets. International Journal of Information and computer Sciences 11 (1982) 341– 356.
  • W. Beaver. Financial Ratios as Predictors of Failure, Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studied. Journal of Accounting Research 4 (1966) 71–111.
  • E.I. Altman. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance 23(4) (1968) 589–609.
  • E. B. Deakin. A discriminant analysis of predictors of business failure. Journal of Accounting Research 10 (1) (1972) 167–179.
  • R. Edmister. An Empirical Test of Financial Ratio Analysis for Small Business Failure Prediction. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 7(2) (1972) 1477–1493.
  • M. Blum. Failing company discriminant analysis. Journal of Accounting Research 12 (1974)1–25.
  • Comision Europea. Annual report on EU Small and Medium sized Enterprises 2010/2011.
  • BIS. (2011). Simpler reporting for the smallest businesses. Discussion paper for department of Business Innovations and Skills (BIS). Electronic document (http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore /business-law/docs/s/11-1100xsimpler-reporting-for-smallest-businesses-discussion-paper).
  • S. Myers. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5(2) (1977) 147– 175.
  • E.I. Altman, G. Sabato y N. Wilson. The value of non-financial information in small and mediumsized enterprise risk management. Journal of Credit Risk 6(2) (2010) 95-127.
  • J.A. Ohlson. Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research 18(1) (1980) 109-131.
  • R.J. Taffler. Empirical Models for the Monitoring of UK Corporations. Journal of Banking and Finance, 8(2) (1984) 199–227.ç
  • M.E. Xin Zmijewsk. Methodological Issues Related to the Estimation of Financial Distress Prediction Models. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (1984) 59–82.
  • M. Dietsch y J. Petey. Should SME Exposures be treated as Retail or Corporate Exposures? A Comparative Analysis of Default Probabilities and Asset Correlation in French and German SMEs. Journal of Banking and Finance 28(4) (2004) 773–788.
  • T. Jacobson, R. Kindell, J. Linde y K. Roszbach. Firm Default and Aggregate Fluctuations. Working Paper, Sveriges Riskbank, no.226, September 2008 Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract =1471254.
  • D.K. Liou y M. Smith. Macroeconomic Variables in the Identification of Financial Distress, Working Paper, May 2006, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=900284.
  • J. Hudson. The Age, Regional and Industrial Structure of Company Liquidations. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 14 (2) (1987) 199–213.
  • D. Citron, y M. Wright. Bankruptcy costs, leverage and multiple secured creditors: the case of managemnet buy-outs. Accounting and Business Research, 38(1) (2008) 781–799.