El registro de DOP e IGP de la UE como paradigma del efecto Bruselasalgunas consideraciones en su XXX aniversario

Referencias bibliográficas

• Bradford, A. (2012). The Brussels effect. Northwestern University Law Review, 107 (1). Disponible en: https://xurl.es/naolw.
• Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect: how the European Union rules the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190 088583.001.0001.
• Comisión Europea (2020). Evaluation support study on geographical indications and traditional specialities guaranteed protected in the European Union (Final Report EC). Brussels: EC. Disponible en: https://xurl.es/nw622.
• Consejo de Ministros de la Unión Europea (2023). Council and Parliament strike provisional deal to protect geographical indications for craft and industrial products (Report CEU. Bulletin CEU; 8205/22). Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/ mr37y5xt.
• Cortés Martín, J. M. (2003). La protección de las indicaciones geográficas en el comercio internacional e intracomunitario. Madrird: Servicio de Publicaciones del Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación.
• Cortés Martín, J. M. (2004a). Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement: towards a better protection for geographical indications? Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 30 (1), 117-184.
• Cortés Martín, J. M. (2004b). World Trade Organization-Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement: The battle between the old and the new world over the protection of geographical indications. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 7 (3), 287-326. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2004. tb00210.x.
• Cortés Martín, J. M. (2016). International protection of geographical indications: About the World Trade Organization negotiations to establish a multilateral system of registration. En D. Gangjee and J. Hughes (eds.). Research Handbook on International Geographical Indications Protection (pp. 69-98). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784719470.00018.
• Evans, G. E. and Blakeney, M. (2006). The protection of geographical indications after Doha: Quo Vadis? Journal of International Economic Law, 9 (3), 575-614. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgl016.
• Henckels, C. (2022). The compatibility of the European Union’s geographical indications regulations for wines with the World Trade Organization Agreement on technical barriers to trade. The Journal of World Investment and Trade, 23, 293-312. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340249.
• Kur, A. (2023). No strings attached to Geographic Information System? About a blind spot in the academic discourse on limitations and fundamental right. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54, 87-94. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01273-9.
• O’Connor, B. and Richardson, L. (2012). The legal protection of geographical indications in the European Union Bilateral Trade Agreements: Moving beyond Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Rivista di Diritto Alimentare, 6 (4), 1-29.
• Ribeiro de Almeida, A. (2020). Geographical indications versus trade marks and generic terms: The United States and China agreement. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 51, 277-281. Disponible en: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-00923-0.
• Song, X. and Wang, X. (2022). Fair use of Geographical Indications: another look at the spirited debate on the level of protection. World Trade Review, 21, 597-618. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745622000258.
• Vogel, D. (1995). Trading up: consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
• Weinian, H. (2020). Dinner for three: European Union, China and the United States around the geographical indications table. Brussels: CEPS Policy Insights.