“El despertar de las máquinas”Reflexiones sobre el estatus moral y jurídico de la Inteligencia Artificial

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aleksander, I. (2017), 7. Machine Consciousness. En S. Schneider y M. Velmans (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness. eTextbook. Blackwell Publishing.
• Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to machine learning. MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13811.001.0001
• Arkin, R. C. (2009). Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture. Proceedings of GECCO 2009, 1:121-128. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420085952
• Asaro, P. M. (2007). Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(2), 491-498. https://peterasaro.org/writing/ASARO%20Legal%20Perspective.pdf.
• Beck, S. (2016). The problem of ascribing legal responsibility in the case of robotics. AI & society, Vol.31 (4), p.473-481, 473-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0624-5
• Bostrom, N. & Yudkowsky, E. (2014) The ethics of artificial intelligence. En The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046855.020
• Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2005_26
• Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. eBook. Oxford University Press.
• Bostrom, N. (2016). Superinteligencia: Caminos, peligros, estrategias. eBook. Ed. Teell.
• Bryson, J J., Theodorou, A. (2019) How society can maintain human-centric artificial intelligence In: Marja Toivonen and Eveliina Saari (ed.), Human-centered digitalization and services (pp. 305-323). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_16
• Bryson, J. J. (2010), Robots should be slaves. En Wilks, Yorick. Close engagements with artificial companions: key social, psychological, ethical and design issues. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.8.11bry
• Bryson, J. J. (2020). The artificial intelligence of the ethics of artificial intelligence: An introductory overview for law and regulation. En M. Dubber, F. Pasquale, & S. Das (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (pp. 2-25). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.1
• Bryson, J. J., Diamantis, M. E., & Grant, T. D. (2017). Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(3), 273-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9214-9
• Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford University Press.
• Chalmers, D. (2010). The singularity: a philosophical analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(9-10), 7-65. https://consc.net/papers/singularity.pdf
• Chopra, S., & White, L. (2011). A legal theory for autonomous artificial agents. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.356801
• Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). Moral appearances: emotions, robots, and human morality.en Wallach, W. & Asaro,P., Machine Ethics and robot ethics. Routledge.
• Dennett, D. (1998). Brainchildren: Essays on designing minds. Penguin Books. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1663.001.0001
• Dennett, D. (2017). From bacteria to Bach and back: The evolution of minds. WW Norton & Company.
• Dennett, D. C. (1995). La conciencia explicada. Paidos Iberica.
• Dennett, D. C. (2008). Can there be intentionality? Should there be? In A. Ross, D. Brook, & D. Thompson (Eds.), Dennett's philosophy: A comprehensive assessment (pp. 147-158). MIT Press
• Díez Spelz, J. F. (2021). ¿Robots con derechos?: la frontera entre lo humano y lo no-humano. Reflexiones desde la teoría de los derechos humanos. Revista del Instituto de Ciencias Jurídicas de Puebla, México, 15(48), 259-287. https://doi.org/10.35487/rius.v15i48.2021.742
• European Commission (2020). White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: a European approach to excellence and trust. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf
• Frankish, Keith. (2014). Introduction en Keith Frankish and William M. Ramsey, The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046855
• Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
• Goertzel, B., & Pennachin, C. (Eds.). (2007). Artificial general intelligence. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68677-4
• Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
• Gordon Graell, R. D. (2021). Inteligencia artificial: la caja de herramientas virtuales al servicio de la bioinformática. Tecnociencia, 24(2), 48-65.
• Grace, K., Salvatier, J., Dafoe, A., Zhang, B., & Evans, O. (2017). When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts. ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08807 https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11222
• Gunkel, D. J. (2018). Robot rights. ePub Version 1.0. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11444.001.0001
• Habermas, J. (2010). Teoría de la acción comunicativa I. Taurus.
• Hallevy, G. (2014). Liability for Crimes Involving Artificial Intelligence Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10124-8
• Inayatullah, S., & McNally, P. (1988). The rights of robots: Technology, culture and law in the 21st century. Futures, 20(2), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(88)90019-5
• Kant, I. (2012) Fundamentación para una metafísica de las costumbres. Alianza Editorial. Documento original publicado en (1785).
• Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near. Viking Penguin.
• Lara, F. & Deckers, J. La inteligencia artificial como asistente socrático para la mejora moral. En Lara, F. y J. Savulescu (Eds), 2021, Más (que) humanos. Biotecnología, inteligencia artificial y ética de la mejora. Tecnos
• Leenes, R., Palmerini, E., Koops, B. J., Bertolini, A., Salvini, P., & Lucivero, F. (2017). Regulatory challenges of robotics: some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innovation and Technology, 9(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1304921
• Locke, J. (2005) Ensayo sobre el entendimiento humano. Fondo de Cultura Económica. (Documento original publicado en 1689).
• Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(3), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1
• Mendis, D. (2019). "TheCLAIM": A model for allocating responsibility and liability for claims of harm arising from the acts and omissions of artificial intelligent agents. Ethics and Information Technology.
• Moor, J. H. (2006). The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics. IEEE intelligent systems, 21(4), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.80
• Ng, A. (2021). What artificial intelligence can and can't do right now. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/11/what-artificial-intelligence-can-and-cant-do-right-now
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Las fronteras de la justicia: Consideraciones sobre la exclusión. Paidós Ibérica.
• Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198519737.001.0001
• Pico della Mirandola, G. (2006). Discurso sobre la dignidad del hombre. Editorial Pí. (Documento original publicado en 1486).
• Porcelli, A. M. (2020). La inteligencia artificial y la robótica: sus dilemas sociales, éticos y jurídicos. Estudios sobre Derecho y Justicia Año 2020, Vol. VI. Número 16, Noviembre 2020 - Febrero 2021, 49-105. https://doi.org/10.32870/dgedj.v6i16.286
• Russell, S. (2019). Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Penguin.
• Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
• Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Inteligencia artificial: un enfoque moderno. Pearson Educación.
• Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and brain sciences, 3(3), 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
• Singer, P. (1999). Liberación animal. Trotta. (Documento original publicado en 1975).
• Solum, L. B. (1992). Legal personhood for artificial intelligences. North Carolina Law Review, 70(4), 1231-1287. http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol70/iss4/4
• Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., & Flick, C. (2016). Ethics of emerging information and communication technologies: On the implementation of responsible research and innovation. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 369-381. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw069
• Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Knopf.
• van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 407-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6
• Villasmil Espinoza, J. J. (2021). Implicaciones de la inteligencia artificial para la humanidad. Revista de la Universidad del Zulia, 12(32), 4-6. https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.32.01
• Vinge, V. (1993). The coming technological singularity. Whole Earth Review, 10. http://www.aids-3d.com/technologicalsingularity.pdf
• Wallach, W., Allen, C., & Smit, I. (2008). Machine morality: Bottom-up and top-down approaches for modelling human moral faculties. AI & Society, 22(4), 565-582. En Wallach, W. & Asaro,P., (2017) Machine Ethics and robot ethics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0099-0
• Wojtyla, K. (2011/1979). Persona y acción. Ediciones Palabra.